A multi-stage anticipated surprise model with dynamic expectation for economic decision-making

被引:0
作者
Chan, Ho Ka [1 ]
Toyoizumi, Taro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RIKEN, Ctr Brain Sci, Lab Neural Computat & Adaptat, Wako, Saitama, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Dept Math Informat, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
REGRET THEORY; PROSPECT-THEORY; LOSS AVERSION; NEURAL BASIS; RISK; DOPAMINE; UTILITY; REPRESENTATION; SEQUENCES; AMBIGUITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-50529-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There are many modeling works that aim to explain people's behaviors that violate classical economic theories. However, these models often do not take into full account the multi-stage nature of real-life problems and people's tendency in solving complicated problems sequentially. In this work, we propose a descriptive decision-making model for multi-stage problems with perceived post-decision information. In the model, decisions are chosen based on an entity which we call the 'anticipated surprise'. The reference point is determined by the expected value of the possible outcomes, which we assume to be dynamically changing during the mental simulation of a sequence of events. We illustrate how our formalism can help us understand prominent economic paradoxes and gambling behaviors that involve multi-stage or sequential planning. We also discuss how neuroscience findings, like prediction error signals and introspective neuronal replay, as well as psychological theories like affective forecasting, are related to the features in our model. This provides hints for future experiments to investigate the role of these entities in decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF BASAL GANGLIA CIRCUITS - NEURAL SUBSTRATES OF PARALLEL PROCESSING
    ALEXANDER, GE
    CRUTCHER, MD
    [J]. TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1990, 13 (07) : 266 - 271
  • [3] Dopamine receptor DOP-4 modulates habituation to repetitive photoactivation of a C. elegans polymodal nociceptor
    Ardiel, Evan L.
    Giles, Andrew C.
    Yu, Alex J.
    Lindsay, Theodore H.
    Lockery, Shawn R.
    Rankin, Catharine H.
    [J]. LEARNING & MEMORY, 2016, 23 (10) : 495 - 503
  • [4] Bennis W., 2004, J. Gambl. Issues, DOI DOI 10.4309/JGI.2004.10.1
  • [5] Bhatia S., 2021, Judgment and Decision Making, V16
  • [6] New paradoxes of risky decision making
    Birnbaum, Michael H.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (02) : 463 - 501
  • [7] REGRET THEORY: A BOLD ALTERNATIVE TO THE ALTERNATIVES
    Bleichrodt, Han
    Wakker, Peter P.
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2015, 125 (583) : 493 - 512
  • [8] Averting risk in the face of large losses: Bernoulli vs. Tversky and Kahneman
    Bosch-Domenech, Antoni
    Silvestre, Joaquim
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 107 (02) : 180 - 182
  • [9] The joy of lottery play: evidence from a field experiment
    Burger, Martijn J.
    Hendriks, Martijn
    Pleeging, Emma
    van Ours, Jan C.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (04) : 1235 - 1256
  • [10] DECISION FIELD-THEORY - A DYNAMIC COGNITIVE APPROACH TO DECISION-MAKING IN AN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT
    BUSEMEYER, JR
    TOWNSEND, JT
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (03) : 432 - 459