Rejection Distress Suppresses Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Borderline Personality Disorder

被引:4
|
作者
Fertuck, Eric A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stanley, Barbara [2 ,3 ]
Kleshchova, Olena
Mann, J. John [2 ,3 ]
Hirsch, Joy [5 ]
Ochsner, Kevin [4 ,6 ]
Pilkonis, Paul [7 ]
Erbe, Jeff [1 ,3 ]
Grinband, Jack [2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Dept Psychol, Clin Psychol Doctoral Program, City Coll, New York, NY 10017 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10017 USA
[3] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Div Mol Imaging & Neuropathol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Univ Nevada Reno, Dept Psychol, Reno, NV USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, Dept Psychiat Neurosci & Comparat Med, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
SOCIAL EXCLUSION; OSTRACISM; SENSITIVITY; INCLUSION; CONFLICT; FMRI; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.11.006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by an elevated distress response to social exclusion (i.e., rejection distress), the neural mechanisms of which remain unclear. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of social exclusion have relied on the classic version of the Cyberball task, which is not optimized for functional magnetic resonance imaging. Our goal was to clarify the neural substrates of rejection distress in BPD using a modified version of Cyberball, which allowed us to dissociate the neural response to exclusion events from its modulation by exclusionary context.METHODS: Twenty-three women with BPD and 22 healthy control participants completed a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging modification of Cyberball with 5 runs of varying exclusion probability and rated their rejection distress after each run. We tested group differences in the whole-brain response to exclusion events and in the parametric modulation of that response by rejection distress using mass univariate analysis.RESULTS: Although rejection distress was higher in participants with BPD (F1,40 = 5.25, p = .027, h2 = 0.12), both groups showed similar neural responses to exclusion events. However, as rejection distress increased, the rostromedial prefrontal cortex response to exclusion events decreased in the BPD group but not in control participants. Stronger modulation of the rostromedial prefrontal cortex response by rejection distress was associated with higher trait rejection expectation, r = 20.30, p = .050.CONCLUSIONS: Heightened rejection distress in BPD might stem from a failure to maintain or upregulate the activity of the rostromedial prefrontal cortex, a key node of the mentalization network. Inverse coupling between rejection distress and mentalization-related brain activity might contribute to heightened rejection expectation in BPD.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 659
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medial prefrontal cortex hyperactivation during social exclusion in borderline personality disorder
    Ruocco, Anthony C.
    Medaglia, John D.
    Tinker, Jennifer R.
    Ayaz, Hasan
    Forman, Evan M.
    Newman, Cory F.
    Williams, J. Michael
    Hillary, Frank G.
    Platek, Steven M.
    Onaral, Banu
    Chute, Douglas L.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2010, 181 (03) : 233 - 236
  • [2] Cerebral processing of social rejection in patients with borderline personality disorder
    Domsalla, Melanie
    Koppe, Georgia
    Niedtfeld, Inga
    Vollstaedt-Klein, Sabine
    Schmahl, Christian
    Bohus, Martin
    Lis, Stefanie
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 9 (11) : 1789 - 1797
  • [3] Negative affect moderates the effect of social rejection on frontal and anterior cingulate cortex activation in borderline personality disorder
    Wrege, Johannes Sebastian
    Ruocco, Anthony Charles
    Euler, Sebastian
    Preller, Katrin H.
    Busmann, Mareike
    Meya, Louisa
    Schmidt, Andre
    Lang, Undine E.
    Borgwardt, Stefan
    Walter, Marc
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 19 (05) : 1273 - 1285
  • [4] Rejection Sensitivity and Borderline Personality Disorder
    Staebler, Katja
    Helbing, Esther
    Rosenbach, Charlotte
    Renneberg, Babette
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2011, 18 (04) : 275 - 283
  • [5] EEG Asymmetry in Borderline Personality Disorder and Depression Following Rejection
    Beeney, Joseph E.
    Levy, Kenneth N.
    Gatzke-Kopp, Lisa M.
    Hallquist, Michael N.
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 5 (02) : 178 - 185
  • [6] Medial prefrontal dysfunction and prolonged amygdala response during instructed fear processing in borderline personality disorder
    Kamphausen, Susanne
    Schroeder, Patricia
    Maier, Simon
    Bader, Kerstin
    Feige, Bernd
    Kaller, Christoph P.
    Glauche, Volkmar
    Ohlendorf, Sabine
    van Elst, Ludger Tebartz
    Kloeppel, Stefan
    Jacob, Gitta A.
    Silbersweig, David
    Lieb, Klaus
    Tuescher, Oliver
    WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 14 (04) : 307 - 318
  • [7] The Rejection-Rage Contingency in Borderline Personality Disorder
    Berenson, Kathy R.
    Downey, Geraldine
    Rafaeli, Eshkol
    Coifman, Karin G.
    Paquin, Nina Leventhal
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 120 (03) : 681 - 690
  • [8] Reduction of rejection-related emotions by transcranial direct current stimulation over right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in borderline personality disorder: A double-blind randomized pilot study
    Lisco, Alessandro
    Gallucci, Alessia
    Fabietti, Chiara
    Fornaroli, Annalisa
    Marchesi, Carlo
    Preti, Emanuele
    Riva, Paolo
    De Panfilis, Chiara
    Lauro, Leonor Josefina Romero
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2025, : 239 - 247
  • [9] MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX AND COGNITIVE REGULATION
    Nakao, Takashi
    Takezawa, Tomohiro
    Miyatani, Makoto
    Ohira, Hideki
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 52 (02) : 93 - 109
  • [10] Negative affect moderates the effect of social rejection on frontal and anterior cingulate cortex activation in borderline personality disorder
    Johannes Sebastian Wrege
    Anthony Charles Ruocco
    Sebastian Euler
    Katrin H. Preller
    Mareike Busmann
    Louisa Meya
    André Schmidt
    Undine E. Lang
    Stefan Borgwardt
    Marc Walter
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019, 19 : 1273 - 1285