How do test-takers rate their effort? A comparative analysis of self-report and log file data

被引:10
作者
Csanyi, Robert [1 ]
Molnar, Gyongyver [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Doctoral Sch Learning & Instruction, Szeged, Hungary
[2] Univ Szeged, Inst Educ, MTA, SZTE Digital Learning Technol Res Grp, Szeged, Hungary
关键词
Test-taking effort; Logfile analyses; Time on task; Number of clicks; K-means clustering; STAKES; MOTIVATION; TIME; INTELLIGENCE; PERFORMANCE; COMPETENCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102340
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study investigates students' test-taking effort by integrating and comparing traditional self-report questionnaire data and students' test-taking behavior, based on log data analyses. Previous studies have shown that different methods often lead to different results. A computer-based measure of complex problem-solving in uncertain situations was used to minimize the influence of factual knowledge on test performance. K-means cluster analysis was used to build groups of students differing in test-taking effort, resulting in 3 distinct groups. The correlation between students' test-taking effort and test performance proved to be weaker based on the self-reported questionnaire data than on their actual test-taking behavior. Both the self-report questionnaire and the log data showed a decrease in test-taking effort during the test. The number of clicks played the largest role in predicting performance. Results suggest that (1) self-report questionnaire data are not consistent with students' actual test-taking behavior and (2) it's not necessary to make the maximum effort to obtain valid test results, but a certain level of effort is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
AlZoubi O., 2013, P 21 INT C COMPUTERS, P1
[2]  
Asseburg R., 2013, Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, V55, P92
[3]   Effort in Low-Stakes Assessments: What Does It Take to Perform as Well as in a High-Stakes Setting? [J].
Attali, Yigal .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2016, 76 (06) :1045-1058
[4]   Modeling Change in Effort Across a Low-Stakes Testing Session: A Latent Growth Curve Modeling Approach [J].
Barry, Carol L. ;
Finney, Sara J. .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2016, 29 (01) :46-64
[5]   Do Examinees Have Similar Test-Taking Effort? A High-Stakes Question for Low-Stakes Testing [J].
Barry, Carol L. ;
Horst, S. Jeanne ;
Finney, Sara J. ;
Brown, Allison R. ;
Kopp, Jason P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2010, 10 (04) :342-363
[6]  
Butler Jayne, 2007, J Appl Meas, V8, P279
[7]  
Cignetti M., 2022, DEV MEASURES ENGAGEM, V279, DOI [10.1787/2d9a73ca-en, DOI 10.1787/2D9A73CA-EN]
[8]   Online measurement of appraisals of students faced with curricular tasks [J].
Crombach, MJ ;
Boekaerts, M ;
Voeten, MJM .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 63 (01) :96-111
[9]   Online Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Personalized Teaching and Learning: The eDia System [J].
Csapo, Beno ;
Molnar, Gyongyver .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[10]   Test stakes and item format interactions [J].
DeMars, CE .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2000, 13 (01) :55-77