Wildlife health surveillance: gaps, needs and opportunities

被引:0
|
作者
Delgado, M. [1 ]
Ferrari, N. [2 ]
Fanelli, A. [3 ]
Muset, S. [1 ]
Thompson, L. [1 ]
Sleeman, J. M. [4 ]
White, C. L. [4 ]
Walsh, D. [4 ,5 ]
Wannous, C. [1 ]
Tizzani, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] World Org Anim Hlth, 12 Rue Prony, F-75017 Paris, France
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Vet Med & Anim Sci, Via Univ 6, I-26900 Lodi, Italy
[3] Univ Bari, Dept Vet Med, Str Prov Casamassima Km 3, I-70010 Metropolitan City Of Bari, Italy
[4] United States Geol Survey, Natl Wildlife Hlth Ctr, 6006 Schroeder Rd, Madison, WI 53711 USA
[5] Univ Montana, United States Geol Survey, Montana Cooperat Wildlife Res Unit, Nat Sci Bldg 205, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
来源
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES | 2023年 / 42卷
基金
美国农业部; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Data quality; Global survey; One Health; Wildlife Health Framework; Wildlife health surveillance; PUBLIC-HEALTH; DISEASES; PREPAREDNESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Disease emergence represents a global threat to public health, economy and biological conservation. Most emerging zoonotic diseases have an animal origin, most commonly from wildlife. To prevent their spread and to support the implementation of control measures, disease surveillance and reporting systems are needed, and due to globalisation, these activities should be carried out at the global level. To define the main gaps affecting the performance of wildlife health surveillance and reporting systems globally, the authors analysed data from a questionnaire sent to National Focal Points of the World Organisation for Animal Health that inquired on structure and limits of wildlife surveillance and reporting systems in their territories. Responses from 103 Members, covering all areas of the globe, revealed that 54.4% have a wildlife disease surveillance programme and 66% have implemented a strategy to manage disease spread. The lack of dedicated budget affected the possibility of outbreak investigations, sample collection and diagnostic testing. Although most Members maintain records relating to wildlife mortality or morbidity events in centralised databases, data analysis and disease risk assessment are reported as priority needs. The authors' evaluation of surveillance capacity found an overall low level, with marked variability among Members that was not restricted to a specific geographical area. Increased wildlife disease surveillance globally would help in understanding and managing risks to animal and public health. Moreover, consideration of the influence of socio-economic, cultural and biodiversity aspects could improve disease surveillance under a One Health approach.
引用
收藏
页数:268
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An operational framework for wildlife health in the One Health approach An operational framework for wildlife health in the One Health approach
    Goulet, C.
    de Garine-Wichatitsky, M.
    Chardonnet, P.
    de Klerk, L. -M.
    Kock, R.
    Muset, S.
    Suu-Ire, R.
    Caron, A.
    ONE HEALTH, 2024, 19
  • [32] Alien Pathogens on the Horizon: Opportunities for Predicting their Threat to Wildlife
    Roy, Helen E.
    Hesketh, Helen
    Purse, Bethan V.
    Eilenberg, Jorgen
    Santini, Alberto
    Scalera, Riccardo
    Stentiford, Grant D.
    Adriaens, Tim
    Bacela-Spychalska, Karolina
    Bass, David
    Beckmann, Katie M.
    Bessell, Paul
    Bojko, Jamie
    Booy, Olaf
    Cardoso, Ana Cristina
    Essl, Franz
    Groom, Quentin
    Harrower, Colin
    Kleespies, Regina
    Martinou, Angeliki F.
    van Oers, Monique M.
    Peeler, Edmund J.
    Pergl, Jan
    Rabitsch, Wolfgang
    Roques, Alain
    Schaffner, Francis
    Schindler, Stefan
    Schmidt, Benedikt R.
    Schonrogge, Karsten
    Smith, Jonathan
    Solarz, Wojciech
    Stewart, Alan
    Stroo, Arjan
    Tricarico, Elena
    Turvey, Katharine M. A.
    Vannini, Andrea
    Vila, Montserrat
    Woodward, Stephen
    Wynns, Anja Amtoft
    Dunn, Alison M.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04): : 477 - 484
  • [33] Editorial: Aquatic one health - the intersection of marine wildlife health, public health, and our oceans
    Norman, Stephanie A.
    Palic, Dusan
    Savage, Ayanna Carla N. Phillips
    Plon, Stephanie
    Shields, Samantha
    Venegas, Claudia
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [34] Unsupervised clustering of wildlife necropsy data for syndromic surveillance
    Warns-Petit, Eva
    Morignat, Eric
    Artois, Marc
    Calavas, Didier
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2010, 6
  • [35] A Public Health Analysis on Gaps in Disease Monitoring and Opportunities for Improved Care for the Management of Hepatitis B and C
    Akhtar, Faisal
    Rehman, Sabah
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (01):
  • [36] New approaches to wildlife health
    Uhart, M. M.
    Sleeman, J. M.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2024, : 145 - 151
  • [37] Towards an Intelligent Decision Support System for Public Health Surveillance - A Qualitative Analysis of Information Needs
    Mera, Maritza
    Gonzalez, Carolina
    Lopez, Diego M.
    INTEGRATING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT FOR QUALITY OF CARE, 2014, 202 : 44 - 47
  • [38] WHO public health research agenda for influenza: road mapping for information gaps and research needs in a pandemic scenario
    Shapovalova, Natasha
    Tam, John S.
    Shindo, Nahoko
    Tim Nguyen
    Briand, Sylvie
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2011, 5 : 258 - 260
  • [39] Integrating wildlife rescue centres in environmental antimicrobial resistance surveillance
    Saied, AbdulRahman A.
    NEW MICROBES AND NEW INFECTIONS, 2024, 62
  • [40] Integration of wildlife and environmental health into a One Health approach
    Sleeman, J. M.
    Richgels, K. L. D.
    White, C. L.
    Stephen, C.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2019, 38 (01): : 91 - 102