Wildlife health surveillance: gaps, needs and opportunities

被引:0
|
作者
Delgado, M. [1 ]
Ferrari, N. [2 ]
Fanelli, A. [3 ]
Muset, S. [1 ]
Thompson, L. [1 ]
Sleeman, J. M. [4 ]
White, C. L. [4 ]
Walsh, D. [4 ,5 ]
Wannous, C. [1 ]
Tizzani, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] World Org Anim Hlth, 12 Rue Prony, F-75017 Paris, France
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Vet Med & Anim Sci, Via Univ 6, I-26900 Lodi, Italy
[3] Univ Bari, Dept Vet Med, Str Prov Casamassima Km 3, I-70010 Metropolitan City Of Bari, Italy
[4] United States Geol Survey, Natl Wildlife Hlth Ctr, 6006 Schroeder Rd, Madison, WI 53711 USA
[5] Univ Montana, United States Geol Survey, Montana Cooperat Wildlife Res Unit, Nat Sci Bldg 205, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
来源
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES | 2023年 / 42卷
基金
美国农业部; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Data quality; Global survey; One Health; Wildlife Health Framework; Wildlife health surveillance; PUBLIC-HEALTH; DISEASES; PREPAREDNESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Disease emergence represents a global threat to public health, economy and biological conservation. Most emerging zoonotic diseases have an animal origin, most commonly from wildlife. To prevent their spread and to support the implementation of control measures, disease surveillance and reporting systems are needed, and due to globalisation, these activities should be carried out at the global level. To define the main gaps affecting the performance of wildlife health surveillance and reporting systems globally, the authors analysed data from a questionnaire sent to National Focal Points of the World Organisation for Animal Health that inquired on structure and limits of wildlife surveillance and reporting systems in their territories. Responses from 103 Members, covering all areas of the globe, revealed that 54.4% have a wildlife disease surveillance programme and 66% have implemented a strategy to manage disease spread. The lack of dedicated budget affected the possibility of outbreak investigations, sample collection and diagnostic testing. Although most Members maintain records relating to wildlife mortality or morbidity events in centralised databases, data analysis and disease risk assessment are reported as priority needs. The authors' evaluation of surveillance capacity found an overall low level, with marked variability among Members that was not restricted to a specific geographical area. Increased wildlife disease surveillance globally would help in understanding and managing risks to animal and public health. Moreover, consideration of the influence of socio-economic, cultural and biodiversity aspects could improve disease surveillance under a One Health approach.
引用
收藏
页数:268
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States: gaps and opportunities
    Bisdorff, B.
    Schauer, B.
    Taylor, N.
    Rodriguez-Prieto, V.
    Comin, A.
    Brouwer, A.
    Dorea, F.
    Drewe, J.
    Hoinville, L.
    Lindberg, A.
    Aviles, M. Martinez
    Martinez-Lopez, B.
    Peyre, M.
    Ferreira, J. Pinto
    Rushton, J.
    Van Schaik, G.
    Stark, K. D. C.
    Staubach, C.
    Vicente-Rubiano, M.
    Witteveen, G.
    Pfeiffer, D.
    Hasler, B.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2017, 145 (04): : 802 - 817
  • [2] Nanoscale reference materials for environmental, health and safety measurements: needs, gaps and opportunities
    Stefaniak, Aleksandr B.
    Hackley, Vincent A.
    Roebben, Gert
    Ehara, Kensei
    Hankin, Steve
    Postek, Michael T.
    Lynch, Iseult
    Fu, Wei-En
    Linsinger, Thomas P. J.
    Thuenemann, Andreas F.
    NANOTOXICOLOGY, 2013, 7 (08) : 1325 - 1337
  • [3] Implementing wildlife disease surveillance in the Netherlands, a One Health approach
    Maas, M.
    Grone, A.
    Kuiken, T.
    van Schaik, G.
    Roest, H. I. J.
    van der Giessen, J. W. B.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2016, 35 (03): : 863 - 874
  • [4] Role of the World Organisation for Animal Health in global wildlife disease surveillance
    Thompson, Lesa
    Cayol, Claire
    Awada, Lina
    Muset, Sophie
    Shetty, Dharmaveer
    Wang, Jingwen
    Tizzani, Paolo
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [5] One health surveillance strategy for coronaviruses in Italian wildlife
    Leopardi, Stefania
    Desiato, Rosanna
    Mazzucato, Matteo
    Orusa, Riccardo
    Obber, Federica
    Averaimo, Daniela
    Berjaoui, Shadia
    Canziani, Sabrina
    Capucchio, Maria Teresa
    Conti, Raffaella
    di Bella, Santina
    Festa, Francesca
    Garofalo, Luisa
    Lelli, Davide
    Madrau, Maria Paola
    Mandola, Maria Lucia
    Martin, Ana Maria Moreno
    Peletto, Simone
    Pirani, Silvia
    Robetto, Serena
    Torresi, Claudia
    Varotto, Maria
    Citterio, Carlo
    Terregino, Calogero
    EPIDEMIOLOGY & INFECTION, 2023, 151
  • [6] Bat Research Networks and Viral Surveillance: Gaps and Opportunities in Western Asia
    Phelps, Kendra L.
    Hamel, Luke
    Alhmoud, Nisreen
    Ali, Shahzad
    Bilgin, Rasit
    Sidamonidze, Ketevan
    Urushadze, Lela
    Karesh, William
    Olival, Kevin J.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2019, 11 (03):
  • [7] Stepping up from wildlife disease surveillance to integrated wildlife monitoring in Europe
    Cardoso, Beatriz
    Garcia-Bocanegra, Ignacio
    Acevedo, Pelayo
    Caceres, German
    Alves, Paulo C.
    Gortazar, Christian
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 144 : 149 - 156
  • [8] Evolving Urban Wildlife Health Surveillance to Intelligence for Pest Mitigation and Monitoring
    Stephen, Craig
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 6
  • [9] US Survey Reveals Gaps, Opportunities for Health, Safety, and Environment Programs
    Milligan, Frank
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 111 (01): : 28 - 32
  • [10] Surveillance and monitoring of wildlife diseases
    Mörner, T
    Obendorf, DL
    Artois, M
    Woodford, MH
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2002, 21 (01): : 67 - 76