An algorithm for the selection of reporting guidelines

A reporting guideline can be defined as "a checklist, flow diagram, or structured text to guide authors in reporting a specific type of research, developed using explicit methodol-ogy." A reporting guideline outlines the bare minimum of information that must be pre-sented in a research report in order to provide a transparent and understandable explana-tion of what was done and what was discovered. Many reporting guidelines have been de-veloped, and it has become important to select the most appropriate reporting guideline for a manuscript. Herein, I propose an algorithm for the selection of reporting guidelines. This algorithm was developed based on the research design classification system and the content presented for major reporting guidelines through the EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research) network. This algorithm asks 10 questions: "is it a protocol," "is it secondary research," "is it an in vivo animal study," "is it qualitative research," "is it economic evaluation research," "is it a diagnostic accuracy study or prog-nostic research," "is it quality improvement research," "is it a non-comparative study," "is it a comparative study between groups," and "is it an experimental study?" According to the responses, 16 appropriate reporting guidelines are suggested. Using this algorithm will make it possible to select reporting guidelines rationally and transparently.