Is corporate environmental responsibility more valuable in the transitory period? The moderating effect of ownership type

被引:3
作者
Zhou, Hui [1 ]
Nagayasu, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, 27-1 Kawauchi,Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808576, Japan
关键词
Corporate environmental responsibility; Firm value; Centralization; Local protectionism; Ownership type; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; LOCAL PROTECTIONISM; LAW-ENFORCEMENT; FIRM VALUE; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2022.103585
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the effect of corporate environmental responsibility (CER) engagement on firm value by emphasizing the moderating role of ownership type. The data from Chinese A-listed firms from 2006 to 2019 are divided into a period of steady institutional background (2006-2015) and a transitory period of environmental reforms (2016-2019) to capture the differences in legal circumstances. First, we find that the impact of CER on firm value changed significantly from negative to positive over the two periods. Second, ownership type plays a moderating role in influencing the effect of CER on firm value. Third, given the environmental reforms, the CER effectiveness for state-owned enterprises affiliated with the central government increased the most, while that for private enterprises increased the least.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Determinants/Motivations of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Developing Economies: A Survey of the Extant Literature
    Ali, Waris
    Wilson, Jeffrey
    Husnain, Muhammad
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [2] Local protectionism and regional specialization: evidence from China's industries
    Bai, CE
    Du, YJ
    Tao, ZG
    Tong, SY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 63 (02) : 397 - 417
  • [3] Does the type of ownership control matter? Evidence from China's listed companies
    Chen, Gongmeng
    Firth, Michael
    Xu, Liping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2009, 33 (01) : 171 - 181
  • [4] Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure
    Darnall, N
    Edwards, D
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (04) : 301 - 320
  • [5] The Role of Board Environmental Committees in Corporate Environmental Performance
    Dixon-Fowler, Heather R.
    Ellstrand, Alan E.
    Johnson, Jonathan L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 140 (03) : 423 - 438
  • [6] Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development
    Escrig-Olmedo, Elena
    Jesus Munoz-Torres, Maria
    Angeles Fernandez-Izquierdo, Maria
    Maria Rivera-Lirio, Juana
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (02) : 142 - 162
  • [7] Firm-specific investor sentiment and stock price crash risk
    Fu, Junhui
    Wu, Xiang
    Liu, Yufang
    Chen, Rongda
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 38
  • [8] Stakeholder social capital: a new approach to stakeholder theory
    Garriga Cots, Elisabet
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2011, 20 (04) : 328 - 341
  • [9] Changes and challenges: China's environmental management in transition
    He, Guizhen
    Lu, Yonglong
    Mol, Arthur P. J.
    Beckers, Theo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 3 : 25 - 38
  • [10] Heberer T., 2017, CRITICAL READINGS CO, P1141