LGCM and PLS-SEM in Panel Survey Data: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

被引:4
作者
Mohd Ghazali, Zulkifli [1 ]
Wan Yaacob, Wan Fairos [2 ,3 ]
Wan Omar, Wan Marhaini [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA, Coll Comp Informat & Media, Math Sci Studies, Kampus Tapah,Tapah Rd, Perak 35400, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol MARA Cawangan Kelantan, Coll Comp Informat & Media, Math Sci Studies, Kampus Kota Bharu, Kota Baharu 15050, Kelantan, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Inst Big Data Analyt & Artificial Intelligence IBD, Kompleks Al Khawarizmi, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Univ Teknol MARA Cawangan Kelantan, Fac Business & Management, Kampus Kota Bharu, Kota Baharu 15050, Kelantan, Malaysia
关键词
bibliometric; SLR; panel survey data; longitudinal survey; Latent Growth Curve Model (LGCM); PLS-SEM; GROWTH; CURVE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; INTELLIGENCE; PERFORMANCE; CONSUMPTION; INTENTIONS; MANAGEMENT; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.3390/data8020032
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The application of Latent Growth Curve Model (LGCM) and Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) has gained much attention in panel survey studies. This study explores the distributions and trends of LGCM, and PLS-SEM used in panel survey data. It highlights the gaps in the current and existing approaches of PLS-SEM practiced by researchers in analyzing panel survey data. The integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review were employed in this study. Based on the reviewed articles, the LGCM and PLS-SEM showed an increasing trend of publication in the panel survey data. Though the popularity of LGCM was more outstanding than PLS-SEM for the panel survey data, LGCM has several limitations such as statistical assumptions, reliable sample size, number of repeated measures, and missing data. This systematic review identified five different approaches of PLS-SEM in analyzing the panel survey data namely pre- and post-approach with different constructs, a path comparison approach, a cross-lagged approach, pre- and post-approach with the same constructs, and an evaluation approach practiced by researchers. None of the previous approaches used can establish one structural model to represent the whole changes in the repeated measure. Thus, the findings of this paper could help researchers choose a more appropriate approach to analyzing panel survey data.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [11] Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research
    Crowley, SL
    Fan, XT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1997, 68 (03) : 508 - 531
  • [12] Twelve Frequently Asked Questions About Growth Curve Modeling
    Curran, Patrick J.
    Obeidat, Khawla
    Losardo, Diane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 11 (02) : 121 - 136
  • [13] How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
    Donthu, Naveen
    Kumar, Satish
    Mukherjee, Debmalya
    Pandey, Nitesh
    Lim, Weng Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 133 : 285 - 296
  • [14] Latent Growth Curve Models for Biomarkers of the Stress Response
    Felt, John M.
    Depaoli, Sarah
    Tiemensma, Jitske
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [15] Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis
    Feng, Yunting
    Zhu, Qinghua
    Lai, Kee-Hung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 158 : 296 - 307
  • [16] 2 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS - LISREL AND PLS APPLIED TO CONSUMER EXIT-VOICE THEORY
    FORNELL, C
    BOOKSTEIN, FL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1982, 19 (04) : 440 - 452
  • [17] Group norms, media preferences, and group meeting success: A longitudinal study
    Guo, Zixiu
    Tan, Felix B.
    Turner, Tim
    Xu, Huizhong
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2010, 26 (04) : 645 - 655
  • [18] Haenlein M., 2004, UNDERSTANDING STAT, V3, P283, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328031us0304_4, DOI 10.1207/S15328031US0304_4, 10.1207/s15328031us0304_4]
  • [19] Hair J. J.F., 2017, International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, V1, P107, DOI [10.1504/ijmda.2017.087624, 10.1504/ijmda.2017.10008574, DOI 10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574]
  • [20] Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison
    Harzing, Anne-Wil
    Alakangas, Satu
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 106 (02) : 787 - 804