From the Meinongian Point of View

被引:0
作者
Sendlak, Maciej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Dept Philosophy, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Alexius Meinong; Peter van Inwagen; Willard van Orman Quine; non-existent objects; quantifiers;
D O I
10.12775/LLP.2022.028
中图分类号
B81 [逻辑学(论理学)];
学科分类号
010104 ; 010105 ;
摘要
In this paper, I discuss one of Peter van Inwagen's charges against the Meinongian thesis, which states that some objects do not exist. The charges aimed to show that the thesis either leads to a contradiction or that it is obscure. Both consequences support the opposite Quinean thesis, which states that every object exists. As opposed to the former, the latter ought to be consistent and clear. I argue why there is no contradiction in the Meinongian thesis and why the Quinean thesis is not clear.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 251
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Berto Francesco, 2013, Existence as a Real Property. The Ontology of Meinongianism, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-4207-9, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4207-9]
[2]  
Castaneda H.N., 1974, PHILOSOPHIA, V4, P3, DOI [10.1007/BF02381514, DOI 10.1007/BF02381514]
[3]  
Jacquette D., 1996, MEINONGIAN LOGIC SEM, DOI [10.1515/9783110879742, DOI 10.1515/9783110879742]
[4]  
LEWIS D, 1990, MIND, V99, P23
[5]  
Parsons T., 1980, NONEXISTENT OBJECTS, DOI [10.2307/2185016, DOI 10.2307/2185016]
[6]  
Pasniczek J., 1999, LOGIC INTENTIONAL OB, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-8996-3
[7]  
Priest G., 2005, Towards non-being: The logic and metaphysics of intentionality, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199262543.001.0001
[8]  
Priest G., 2016, Towards non-being: The logic and metaphysics of intentionality, V2, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783596.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198783596.001.0001]
[9]  
Quine W.V.O., 1948, REV METAPHYS, V2, P21
[10]   MEINONGIAN THEORIES AND A RUSSELLIAN PARADOX [J].
RAPAPORT, WJ .
NOUS, 1978, 12 (02) :153-180