Enlightened shared value: a new stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility

被引:4
作者
Han, Shin [1 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Grad Univ, Div Behav & Org Sci, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Social dilemma; Enlightened shared value; Long-term value maximization; Stakeholder perspective; AGENCY; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; CSR; SUSTAINABILITY; COOPERATION; DILEMMAS; STRATEGY; WELL; GAME;
D O I
10.1108/SRJ-05-2021-0211
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to provide a new conceptual approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR), termed enlightened shared value (ESV), by applying the social dilemma paradigm and long-term value maximization. Design/methodology/approach In this conceptual paper, the author analyzes CSR as an organizational social dilemma, where the conflicts among stakeholders and between short- and long-term outcomes are inevitable. To minimize these conflicts, firms need to aim at long-term value maximization to provide the maximum outcome to the firm and satisfy all relevant stakeholders. Adopting these perspectives, the author introduces ESV and compares ESV with major CSR approaches. Findings ESV provides a clear metric and the method for CSR, which is lacking in existing CSR approaches. Consequently, ESV is superior to and has better applicability than existing CSR approaches. The author suggests that shifting focus to long-term outcomes can reduce the conflicts in CSR and make CSR a win-win game. Originality/value As an alternative to existing CSR approaches, ESV can provide the best outcome to the firm and all relevant stakeholders. ESV adds the understanding of CSR's theoretical discussions and provides a practical guideline to practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 37
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina [J].
Mutti, Diana ;
Yakovleva, Natalia ;
Vazquez-Brust, Diego ;
Di Marco, Martin H. .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2012, 37 (02) :212-222
[42]   Exploring corporate social responsibility practice versus stakeholder interests in Nordic mining [J].
Ranangen, Helena ;
Lindman, Asa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 :668-677
[43]   Divergent stakeholder views of corporate social responsibility in the Australian forest plantation sector [J].
Gordon, Melissa ;
Lockwood, Michael ;
Vanclay, Frank ;
Hanson, Dallas ;
Schirmer, Jacki .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 113 :390-398
[44]   Corporate Social Responsibility as Stakeholder Engagement: Firm-NGO Collaboration in Sweden [J].
Fontana, Enrico .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (04) :327-338
[45]   Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder ResponsibilityFrom Corporate Social Responsibility Toward a Comprehensive and Dynamic View of Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility [J].
Sybille Sachs ;
Marc Maurer .
Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 85 (Suppl 3) :535-544
[46]   The impact of corporate social responsibility types on happiness management: a stakeholder theory perspective [J].
Mu, Hong-Lei ;
Xu, Jiang ;
Chen, Sijing .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024, 62 (02) :591-613
[47]   Stakeholder Symbiosis in the Context of Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Wang, Danli ;
Zhu, Weidong ;
Zhang, Chao ;
Li, Hongyi ;
Wu, Yong .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (11) :1-19
[48]   Corporate Social Responsibility, Stakeholder Engagement, and Universities [J].
Aversano, Natalia ;
Nicolo, Giuseppe ;
Sannino, Giuseppe ;
Polcini, Paolo Tartaglia .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (03)
[49]   Corporate Social Responsibility in China: a Preferential Stakeholder Model and Effects [J].
Xun, Jiyao .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 22 (07) :471-483
[50]   Corporate social responsibility, brand value and corporate governance: new evidence from a 3SLS model [J].
Ke, Di ;
Jia, Ximeng ;
Li, Yuanyuan ;
Wang, Peipei .
CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024, 18 (03) :847-868