Enlightened shared value: a new stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility

被引:4
作者
Han, Shin [1 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Grad Univ, Div Behav & Org Sci, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Social dilemma; Enlightened shared value; Long-term value maximization; Stakeholder perspective; AGENCY; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; CSR; SUSTAINABILITY; COOPERATION; DILEMMAS; STRATEGY; WELL; GAME;
D O I
10.1108/SRJ-05-2021-0211
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to provide a new conceptual approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR), termed enlightened shared value (ESV), by applying the social dilemma paradigm and long-term value maximization. Design/methodology/approach In this conceptual paper, the author analyzes CSR as an organizational social dilemma, where the conflicts among stakeholders and between short- and long-term outcomes are inevitable. To minimize these conflicts, firms need to aim at long-term value maximization to provide the maximum outcome to the firm and satisfy all relevant stakeholders. Adopting these perspectives, the author introduces ESV and compares ESV with major CSR approaches. Findings ESV provides a clear metric and the method for CSR, which is lacking in existing CSR approaches. Consequently, ESV is superior to and has better applicability than existing CSR approaches. The author suggests that shifting focus to long-term outcomes can reduce the conflicts in CSR and make CSR a win-win game. Originality/value As an alternative to existing CSR approaches, ESV can provide the best outcome to the firm and all relevant stakeholders. ESV adds the understanding of CSR's theoretical discussions and provides a practical guideline to practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 37
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Proposals [J].
Eding, Erwin ;
Scholtens, Bert .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (06) :648-660
[32]   CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE CONTEXT OF SHARED SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY [J].
Morariu, Titiana-Maria .
CRISES AFTER THE CRISIS: INQUIRIES FROM A NATIONAL, EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE, VOL II, 2011, :220-226
[33]   Corporate social responsibility in sport: Stakeholder management in the UK football industry [J].
Walters, Geoff ;
Tacon, Richard .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 16 (04) :566-586
[34]   CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A NEW APPROACH TO THE EMPLOYEES' SATISFACTION [J].
Dohnalova, Marie ;
Legnerova, Katerina .
12TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2018, :373-382
[35]   Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness? [J].
Laguir, Issam ;
Stagliano, Raffaele ;
Elbaz, Jamal .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 107 :662-675
[36]   Corporate Responsibility and Identity: from a Stakeholder to an Awareness Approach [J].
Heikkurinen, Pasi ;
Ketola, Tarja .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 21 (05) :326-337
[37]   Corporate Social Responsibility Value for Customers [J].
Susniene, Dalia ;
Zostautiene, Daiva ;
Atay, Lutfi .
CHANGES IN SOCIAL AND BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT, CISABE 2022, 2022, :133-139
[38]   The role of corporate social responsibility in predicting CO2 emission: An institutional approach [J].
Kudlak, Robert .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 163 :169-176
[39]   Multisided collaboration and double stakeholder approach coexistence in restaurants: From Corporate Social Responsibility practices to partnerships for the goals [J].
Cantele, Silvia ;
Riso, Vincenzo ;
Vernizzi, Silvia .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (06) :6275-6289
[40]   Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation [J].
Jeffrey, Scott ;
Rosenberg, Stuart ;
McCabe, Brianna .
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2019, 15 (03) :395-408