Conducting research with Indigenous Peoples in Canada: ethical and policy considerations

被引:2
作者
Morisano, Dominique [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Robinson, Margaret [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Rush, Brian [1 ,3 ]
Linklater, Renee [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Psychol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Inst Mental Hlth Policy Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept English, Halifax, NS, Canada
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Sociol & Social Anthropol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Shkaabe Makwa, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
Indigenous; policy; ethics; research; methodologies; First Nations; principles; guidelines; HEALTH RESEARCH; FRAMEWORK; METHODOLOGIES; COMMUNITIES; RIGHTS; GAPS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214121
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The international context of Indigenous mental health and wellbeing has been shaped by a number of key works recognizing Indigenous rights. Despite international recognitions, the mental health and wellness of Indigenous Peoples continues to be negatively affected by policies that ignore Indigenous rights, that frame colonization as historical rather than ongoing, or that minimize the impact of assimilation. Research institutions have a responsibility to conduct ethical research; yet institutional guidelines, principles, and policies often serve Indigenous Peoples poorly by enveloping them into Western knowledge production. To counter epistemological domination, Indigenous Peoples assert their research sovereignty, which for the purposes of this paper we define as autonomous control over research conducted on Indigenous territory or involving Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous sovereignty might also be applied to research impacting the landscape and the web of animal and spiritual lives evoked in a phrase such as "all my relations." This narrative review of material developed in the Canadian context examines the alignment with similar work in the international context to offer suggestions and a practice-based implementation tool to support Indigenous sovereignty in research related to wellness, mental health, and substance use. The compilation of key guidelines and principles in this article is only a start; addressing deeper issues requires a research paradigm shift.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Aboriginal Healing Foundation, 2017, FAQs
  • [2] Aboriginal Healing Foundation, 2010, Aboriginal Healing Foundation research series
  • [3] AIATSIS, 2020, AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS)
  • [4] Angel Moore, 2021, Pictou landing First Nation members suing researchers for 'secret' experiment says claim
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, The ethics rupture: Exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, National Inuit Strategy on Research
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, Guidelines for ethical Aboriginal research (GEAR)
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, CIHR guidelines for health research involving Aboriginal people
  • [9] Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) and The Lowitja Institute, 2013, Evaluation of the National Health and medical research council documents: Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Health Research 2004 (values and ethics) and keeping research on track: A guide for Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Peoples about Health Research ethics 2005 (keeping research on track)
  • [10] Enacting research ethics in partnerships with indigenous communities in Canada: "Do it in a good way"
    Ball, Jessica
    Janyst, Pauline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2008, 3 (02) : 33 - 51