A review of machine learning applications in life cycle assessment studies

被引:16
作者
Romeiko, Xiaobo Xue [1 ]
Zhang, Xuesong [2 ]
Pang, Yulei [3 ]
Gao, Feng [2 ]
Xu, Ming [4 ]
Lin, Shao [1 ]
Babbitt, Callie [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Albany, State Univ New York, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] United States Dept Agr, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[3] Southern Connecticut State Univ, Dept Math, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Dvis Environm Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Rochester Inst Technol, Golisano Inst Sustainabil, Dept Sustainabil, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Machine learning; Sustainability; Prediction; Model selection; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; BIG DATA; CROSS-VALIDATION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; EMISSIONS; MODEL; INVENTORY; IMPACTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168969
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a foundational method for quantitative assessment of sustainability. Increasing data availability and rapid development of machine learning (ML) approaches offer new opportunities to advance LCA. Here, we review current progress and knowledge gaps in applying ML techniques to support LCA, and identify future research directions for LCAs to better harness the power of ML. This review analyzes forty studies reporting quantitative assessment with a combination of LCA and ML methods. We found that ML approaches have been used for generating life cycle inventories, computing characterization factors, estimating life cycle impacts, and supporting life cycle interpretation. Most of the reviewed studies employed a single ML method, with artificial neural networks (ANNs) as the most frequently applied approach. Both supervised and unsupervised ML techniques were used in LCA studies. For studies using supervised ML, training datasets were derived from diverse sources, such as literature, lab experiments, existing databases, and model simulations. Over 70 % of these reviewed studies trained ML models with less than 1500 sample datasets. Although these reviewed studies showed that ML approaches help improve prediction accuracy, pattern discovery and computational efficiency, multiple areas deserve further research. First, continuous data collection and compilation is needed to support more reliable ML and LCA modeling. Second, future studies should report sufficient details regarding the selection criteria for ML models and present model uncertainty analysis. Third, incorporating deep learning models into LCA holds promise to further improve life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Finally, the complexity of current environmental challenges calls for interdisciplinary collaborative research to achieve deep integration of ML into LCA to support sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine Learning Approaches to Natural Fiber Composites: A Review of Methodologies and Applications
    Palanisamy, Sivasubramanian
    Ayrilmis, Nadir
    Sureshkumar, Kumar
    Santulli, Carlo
    Khan, Tabrej
    Junaedi, Harri
    Sebaey, Tamer A.
    BIORESOURCES, 2025, 20 (01): : 2321 - 2345
  • [42] Multi-objective optimization of ultra-high performance concrete based on life-cycle assessment and machine learning methods
    Wang, Min
    Du, Mingfeng
    Zhuang, Xiaoying
    Lv, Hui
    Wang, Chong
    Zhou, Shuai
    FRONTIERS OF STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2025, 19 (01) : 143 - 161
  • [43] A Literature Review of Using Machine Learning in Software Development Life Cycle Stages
    Shafiq, Saad
    Mashkoor, Atif
    Mayr-Dorn, Christoph
    Egyed, Alexander
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 140896 - 140920
  • [44] Machine learning for embodied carbon life cycle assessment of buildings
    Hamza El Hafdaoui
    Ahmed Khallaayoun
    Ibtissam Bouarfa
    Kamar Ouazzani
    Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, 2023, 14 (3): : 188 - 200
  • [45] Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review
    Helin, Tuomas
    Sokka, Laura
    Soimakallio, Sampo
    Pingoud, Kim
    Pajula, Tiina
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2013, 5 (05): : 475 - 486
  • [46] How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies?
    Igos, Elorri
    Benetto, Enrico
    Meyer, Rodolphe
    Baustert, Paul
    Othoniel, Benoit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (04) : 794 - 807
  • [47] How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance
    Ingrao, Carlo
    Messineo, Antonio
    Beltramo, Riccardo
    Yigitcanlar, Tan
    Ioppolo, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 : 556 - 569
  • [48] State of art review on Life Cycle Assessment of polymers
    Ramesh, P.
    Vinodh, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2020, 13 (06) : 411 - 422
  • [49] A Review on Life Cycle Assessment of the Olive Oil Production
    Rapa, Mattia
    Ciano, Salvatore
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [50] Life Cycle Assessment in Road Pavement Infrastructures: A Review
    Gouveia, Bruno Guida
    Donato, Marina
    da Silva, Marcelino Aurelio Vieira
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2022, 8 (06): : 1304 - 1315