A review of machine learning applications in life cycle assessment studies

被引:16
作者
Romeiko, Xiaobo Xue [1 ]
Zhang, Xuesong [2 ]
Pang, Yulei [3 ]
Gao, Feng [2 ]
Xu, Ming [4 ]
Lin, Shao [1 ]
Babbitt, Callie [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Albany, State Univ New York, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] United States Dept Agr, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[3] Southern Connecticut State Univ, Dept Math, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Dvis Environm Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Rochester Inst Technol, Golisano Inst Sustainabil, Dept Sustainabil, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Machine learning; Sustainability; Prediction; Model selection; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; BIG DATA; CROSS-VALIDATION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; EMISSIONS; MODEL; INVENTORY; IMPACTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168969
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a foundational method for quantitative assessment of sustainability. Increasing data availability and rapid development of machine learning (ML) approaches offer new opportunities to advance LCA. Here, we review current progress and knowledge gaps in applying ML techniques to support LCA, and identify future research directions for LCAs to better harness the power of ML. This review analyzes forty studies reporting quantitative assessment with a combination of LCA and ML methods. We found that ML approaches have been used for generating life cycle inventories, computing characterization factors, estimating life cycle impacts, and supporting life cycle interpretation. Most of the reviewed studies employed a single ML method, with artificial neural networks (ANNs) as the most frequently applied approach. Both supervised and unsupervised ML techniques were used in LCA studies. For studies using supervised ML, training datasets were derived from diverse sources, such as literature, lab experiments, existing databases, and model simulations. Over 70 % of these reviewed studies trained ML models with less than 1500 sample datasets. Although these reviewed studies showed that ML approaches help improve prediction accuracy, pattern discovery and computational efficiency, multiple areas deserve further research. First, continuous data collection and compilation is needed to support more reliable ML and LCA modeling. Second, future studies should report sufficient details regarding the selection criteria for ML models and present model uncertainty analysis. Third, incorporating deep learning models into LCA holds promise to further improve life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Finally, the complexity of current environmental challenges calls for interdisciplinary collaborative research to achieve deep integration of ML into LCA to support sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Biomedical Applications
    Binson, V. A.
    Thomas, Sania
    Subramoniam, M.
    Arun, J.
    Naveen, S.
    Madhu, S.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 52 (04) : 1051 - 1066
  • [32] Life cycle assessment in the building design process - A systematic literature review
    Roberts, Matthew
    Allen, Stephen
    Coley, David
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 185
  • [33] Temporal discounting in life cycle assessment: A critical review and theoretical framework
    Yuan, Chris
    Wang, Endong
    Zhai, Qiang
    Yang, Fan
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 51 : 23 - 31
  • [34] Life Cycle Assessment of Geotechnical Works in Building Construction: A Review and Recommendations
    Song, Xingqiang
    Carlsson, Christel
    Kiilsgaard, Ramona
    Bendz, David
    Kennedy, Helene
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 17
  • [35] Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review
    Mesa, Jaime A.
    Fuquene-Retamoso, Carlos
    Maury-Ramirez, Anibal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [36] An integration of machine learning models and life cycle assessment for lignocellulosic bioethanol platforms
    Long, Fei
    Liu, Hong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 292
  • [37] Toward the application of a machine learning framework for building life cycle energy assessment
    Venkatraj, V.
    Dixit, M. K.
    Yan, W.
    Caffey, S.
    Sideris, P.
    Aryal, A.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 297
  • [38] A framework of integrating machine learning model and pavement life cycle assessment to optimize asphalt mixture design
    Xu, Chang
    Chen, Xiao
    Zeng, Qingwei
    Cai, Mingmao
    Zhang, Wenxuan
    Yu, Bin
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2025, 469
  • [39] Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review of Research for Temporal Variations in Life Cycle Assessment Studies
    Su, Shu
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Chen
    Lu, Yujie
    Lee, Hyun Woo
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 38 (11) : 1013 - 1026
  • [40] Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review
    Bektas, Mustafa
    Burchell, George L.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (01): : 75 - 89