A review of machine learning applications in life cycle assessment studies

被引:16
|
作者
Romeiko, Xiaobo Xue [1 ]
Zhang, Xuesong [2 ]
Pang, Yulei [3 ]
Gao, Feng [2 ]
Xu, Ming [4 ]
Lin, Shao [1 ]
Babbitt, Callie [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Albany, State Univ New York, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] United States Dept Agr, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[3] Southern Connecticut State Univ, Dept Math, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Dvis Environm Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Rochester Inst Technol, Golisano Inst Sustainabil, Dept Sustainabil, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Machine learning; Sustainability; Prediction; Model selection; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; BIG DATA; CROSS-VALIDATION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; EMISSIONS; MODEL; INVENTORY; IMPACTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168969
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a foundational method for quantitative assessment of sustainability. Increasing data availability and rapid development of machine learning (ML) approaches offer new opportunities to advance LCA. Here, we review current progress and knowledge gaps in applying ML techniques to support LCA, and identify future research directions for LCAs to better harness the power of ML. This review analyzes forty studies reporting quantitative assessment with a combination of LCA and ML methods. We found that ML approaches have been used for generating life cycle inventories, computing characterization factors, estimating life cycle impacts, and supporting life cycle interpretation. Most of the reviewed studies employed a single ML method, with artificial neural networks (ANNs) as the most frequently applied approach. Both supervised and unsupervised ML techniques were used in LCA studies. For studies using supervised ML, training datasets were derived from diverse sources, such as literature, lab experiments, existing databases, and model simulations. Over 70 % of these reviewed studies trained ML models with less than 1500 sample datasets. Although these reviewed studies showed that ML approaches help improve prediction accuracy, pattern discovery and computational efficiency, multiple areas deserve further research. First, continuous data collection and compilation is needed to support more reliable ML and LCA modeling. Second, future studies should report sufficient details regarding the selection criteria for ML models and present model uncertainty analysis. Third, incorporating deep learning models into LCA holds promise to further improve life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Finally, the complexity of current environmental challenges calls for interdisciplinary collaborative research to achieve deep integration of ML into LCA to support sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applications of machine learning in thermochemical conversion of biomass-A review
    Khan, Muzammil
    Naqvi, Salman Raza
    Ullah, Zahid
    Taqvi, Syed Ali Ammar
    Khan, Muhammad Nouman Aslam
    Farooq, Wasif
    Mehran, Muhammad Taqi
    Juchelkov, Dagmar
    Stepanec, Libor
    FUEL, 2023, 332
  • [22] Estimate ecotoxicity characterization factors for chemicals in life cycle assessment using machine learning models
    Hou, Ping
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Zhu, Ji
    Xu, Ming
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 135
  • [23] Integrating life cycle assessment and life cycle cost: a review of environmental-economic studies
    Wagner Teixeira França
    Murillo Vetroni Barros
    Rodrigo Salvador
    Antonio Carlos de Francisco
    Maria Teresa Moreira
    Cassiano Moro Piekarski
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 244 - 274
  • [24] Current Trends and Applications of Machine Learning in Tribology-A Review
    Marian, Max
    Tremmel, Stephan
    LUBRICANTS, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [25] Machine-Learning Applications in Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Lopez-Cortes, Xaviera A.
    Matamala, Felipe
    Venegas, Bernardo
    Rivera, Cesar
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [26] Integrating life cycle assessment and life cycle cost: a review of environmental-economic studies
    Franca, Wagner Teixeira
    Barros, Murillo Vetroni
    Salvador, Rodrigo
    de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
    Moreira, Maria Teresa
    Piekarski, Cassiano Moro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (02) : 244 - 274
  • [27] Machine learning applications for biochar studies: A mini-review
    Wang, Wei
    Chang, Jo-Shu
    Lee, Duu-Jong
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 394
  • [28] Temporal discounting in life cycle assessment: A critical review and theoretical framework
    Yuan, Chris
    Wang, Endong
    Zhai, Qiang
    Yang, Fan
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 51 : 23 - 31
  • [29] Life Cycle Assessment of Geotechnical Works in Building Construction: A Review and Recommendations
    Song, Xingqiang
    Carlsson, Christel
    Kiilsgaard, Ramona
    Bendz, David
    Kennedy, Helene
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 17
  • [30] Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review
    Mesa, Jaime A.
    Fuquene-Retamoso, Carlos
    Maury-Ramirez, Anibal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)