A radiomics based method for prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using enlarged region of interest

被引:2
作者
Zhuang, Haoming [1 ]
Chatterjee, Aritrick [2 ]
Fan, Xiaobing [2 ]
Qi, Shouliang [1 ]
Qian, Wei [1 ]
He, Dianning [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Med & Biol Informat Engn, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiparametric MRI; Gleason score; Texture feature; Machine learning; Prostate cancer; BIOPSY; MRI; ACCURACY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01167-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men worldwide, and its timely diagnosis and treatment are becoming increasingly important. MRI is in increasing use to diagnose cancer and to distinguish between non-clinically significant and clinically significant PCa, leading to more precise diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this study is to present a radiomics-based method for determining the Gleason score (GS) for PCa using tumour heterogeneity on multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI).MethodsTwenty-six patients with biopsy-proven PCa were included in this study. The quantitative T2 values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal enhancement rates (alpha) were calculated using multi-echo T2 images, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), for the annotated region of interests (ROI). After texture feature analysis, ROI range expansion and feature filtering was performed. Then obtained data were put into support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and other classifiers for binary classification.ResultsThe highest classification accuracy was 73.96% for distinguishing between clinically significant (Gleason 3 + 4 and above) and non-significant cancers (Gleason 3 + 3) and 83.72% for distinguishing between Gleason 3 + 4 from Gleason 4 + 3 and above, which was achieved using initial ROIs drawn by the radiologists. The accuracy improved when using expanded ROIs to 80.67% using SVM and 88.42% using Bayesian classification for distinguishing between clinically significant and non-significant cancers and Gleason 3 + 4 from Gleason 4 + 3 and above, respectively.ConclusionsOur results indicate the research significance and value of this study for determining the GS for prostate cancer using the expansion of the ROI region.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] PROSTATEx Challenges for computerized classification of prostate lesions from multiparametric magnetic resonance images
    Armato, Samuel G., II
    Huisman, Henkjan
    Drukker, Karen
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Kirby, Justin S.
    Petrick, Nicholas
    Redmond, George
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Cha, Kenny
    Mamonov, Artem
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Farahani, Keyvan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 5 (04)
  • [3] Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Niazi, Tamim
    Probst, Stephan
    Bladou, Franck
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Bahoric, Boris
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [4] Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study
    Chatterjee, Aritrick
    He, Dianning
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Antic, Tatjana
    Jiang, Yulei
    Eggener, Scott
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Oto, Aytekin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (02) : W66 - W75
  • [5] Revisiting quantitative multi-parametric MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its differentiation from transition zone cancer
    Chatterjee, Aritrick
    Gallan, Alexander J.
    He, Dianning
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Mustafi, Devkumar
    Yousuf, Ambereen
    Antics, Tatjana
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Oto, Aytekin
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (06) : 2233 - 2243
  • [6] Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
    Dikaios, Nikolaos
    Giganti, Francesco
    Sidhu, Harbir S.
    Johnston, Edward W.
    Appayya, Mrishta B.
    Simmons, Lucy
    Freeman, Alex
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Atkinson, David
    Punwani, Shonit
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (08) : 4150 - 4159
  • [7] Biopsy standards for detection of prostate cancer
    Djavan, Bob
    Margreiter, Markus
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [8] Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) : 1019 - 1024
  • [9] Accuracy of MRI-Targeted in-Bore Prostate Biopsy According to the Gleason Score with Postprostatectomy Histopathologic Control-a Targeted Biopsy-Only Strategy with Limited Number of Cores
    Garmer, Marietta
    Busch, Martin
    Mateiescu, Serban
    Fahlbusch, David E.
    Wagener, Birgit
    Groenemeyer, Dietrich H. W.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (11) : 1409 - 1418
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Prediction of Final Prostate Pathology
    Le, Jesse D.
    Stephenson, Samuel
    Brugger, Michelle
    Lu, David Y.
    Lieu, Patricia
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05) : 1367 - 1373