The accuracy of the trifocal IOL calculation using equivalent K-readings and total corneal power in different zones

被引:1
|
作者
Shukhaev, Sergey Viktorovich [1 ]
Pustozerov, Evgenii [2 ]
Boiko, Ernest Vitalievich [1 ]
Kirillova, Olga Valerievna [1 ]
机构
[1] S Fyodorov Eye Microsurg Fed State Inst, Y Gasheka St 21, St Petersburg 192283, Russia
[2] Exposit Consulting Sp Zoo, Jana Heweliusza 11-819, PL-80890 Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Equivalent K-readings; Total keratometry; Keratometry zone; IOL calculation; PREDICTION ACCURACY; KERATOMETRY; OUTCOMES; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-023-06198-8
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PurposeTo identify the equivalent K-readings and total keratometry zones that is optimally suitable for calculating the IOL spheroequivalent according to 7 formulas.MethodsThe study included 40 patients (40 eyes) who underwent uneventful femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange (RLE) with implantation of a trifocal diffractive IOL (PanOptix, Alcon inc.). Targeted emmetropia was achieved in all patients, no distance and near correction was needed. Retrospective IOL calculations were performed utilizing 7 formulas (SRK/T, Holladay 1 and 2, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal 2, Olsen) and Pentacam keratometry data: Holladay equivalent K-readings, total optical power by ray tracing (TCRP) centered on the apex and pupil in 10 zones (from 0.5 to 5 mm in 0.5 mm increments). For each formula/zone/map combination: postoperative predicted refraction (PPRs), mean absolute errors (MAEs), and median absolute errors (MedAEs) were analyzed.ResultsAccording to EKR, the Haigis formula showed the lowest error in the central zones up to 3.5 mm, the TCRP zone for Holladay I and II formulas 4.0-4.5 mm, for HofferQ and SRK/T formulas 4.5-5.0 mm, and for Olsen and Barrett II Universal-5 mm.ConclusionThe use of keratometry data (EKR, TCRP) in the formulas adapted to SimK, with the correct choice of the evaluation zone of keratometric data, will increase the chance of hitting the refractive target.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 504
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] IOL power calculations after LASIK or PRK: Barrett True-K biometer-only calculation strategy yields equivalent outcomes as a multiple formula approach
    Ferguson, Tanner J.
    Downes, Rachel A.
    Randleman, J. Bradley
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (07): : 784 - 789
  • [32] Prediction Accuracy of Total Keratometry Compared to Standard Keratometry Using Different Intraocular Lens Power Formulas
    Fabian, Ekkehard
    Wehner, Wolfram
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 35 (06) : 362 - 369
  • [33] Accuracy of Total Corneal Power Calculation for Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation: Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometer vs Scheimpflug Tomographer
    Choi, Ayoung
    Kwon, Hyunggoo
    Jeon, Sohee
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 37 (10) : 686 - +
  • [34] A Comparative Study of Total Corneal Power Using a Ray Tracing Method Obtained from 3 Different Scheimpflug Camera Devices
    Pan, Chao
    Tan, Weina
    Savini, Giacomo
    Hua, Yanjun
    Ye, Xiuhong
    Xu, Wenjin
    Yu, Jinjin
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Jinhai
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 216 : 90 - 98
  • [35] Accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation depending on different keratometry values using a novel network based software platform
    Ramsauer, Michaela
    Luft, Nikolaus
    Vounotrypidis, Efstathios
    Priglinger, Siegfried G.
    Mayer, Wolfgang J.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [36] To compare the refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using conventional keratometry (K) with Barrett Universal II formula and total keratometry (TK) with Barrett TK Universal II formula for intraocular lens power calculation
    Saini, Pragya
    Choudhry, Saurabh
    Rajput, Meetu
    Sen, Sagnik
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)