Robustness of resistance surface optimisations: sampling schemes and genetic distance metrics affect inferences in landscape genetics

被引:4
作者
Schleimer, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Luttringer, Amanda [1 ,2 ]
Wittische, Julian [1 ,2 ]
Drygala, Frank [3 ]
Proess, Roland [4 ]
Cantu-Salazar, Lisette [5 ]
Frantz, Alain C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Musee Natl Hist Nat, 25 Rue Munster, L-2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[2] Fdn Faune Flore, 25 Rue Munster, L-2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[3] Assoc Nat & Biodivers ANB, D-60386 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Umweltplanungsburo Ecotop, 45 Schlassuecht, L-7435 Hollenfels, Luxembourg
[5] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol, 5 Ave Hauts Fourneaux, L-4362 Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
ResistanceGA; Landscape genetics; Genetic distances; Resistance surfaces; Connectivity; Triturus cristatus; NEWT TRITURUS-CRISTATUS; CRESTED NEWT; R PACKAGE; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; MICROSATELLITE LOCI; MOVEMENT ECOLOGY; F-STATISTICS; CONNECTIVITY; DIFFERENTIATION; SALAMANDER;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-023-01752-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Landscape genetics provides powerful tools to quantify the effects of landscape features on population connectivity, but robust results are imperative to inform conservation planning.Objectives The robustness of landscape genetic inferences was assessed using the case of the northern crested newt (Triturus cristatus) in Luxembourg. Specifically, the effect of different study designs and genetic distance metrics was tested in terms of model convergence and misspecification rates (Type I error).Methods The optimisation of resistance surfaces was performed in ResistanceGA, using individual- and population-based sampling designs and 16 genetic distance metrics inferred from 897 multilocus genotypes from 85 locations. Empirical results were complemented with simulations to assess Type I error rates and correlation between 'true' and optimised resistance surfaces.Results Individual-based optimisations seemed prone to overfitting, with little convergence among empirical resistance surfaces from different sets of individuals. Simulations showed significant differences in performance among population genetic distance metrics. Linear topographical features exhibited higher Type I error rates (83.3%) than continuous features (44.9%), suggesting potential underestimation of road-induced fragmentation effects. Jost's D, F-ST and PCA axes 1-45 were the top three genetic distance metrics for recovering true resistance features. Topographic roughness consistently drove spatial genetic clustering of T. cristatus, but variability existed among conductivity maps derived from optimised resistance surfaces.Conclusions These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting genetic distance metrics and addressing potential sources of uncertainty in resistance surface optimisation. By doing so, we can enhance the effectiveness of conservation planning efforts for T. cristatus and species with similar ecological considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:2861 / 2883
页数:23
相关论文
共 111 条
  • [91] Landscape genetic inferences vary with sampling scenario for a pond-breeding amphibian
    Seaborn, Travis
    Hauser, Samantha S.
    Konrade, Lauren
    Waits, Lisette P.
    Goldberg, Caren S.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (09): : 5063 - 5078
  • [92] Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges
    Segelbacher, Gernot
    Cushman, Samuel A.
    Epperson, Bryan K.
    Fortin, Marie-Josee
    Francois, Olivier
    Hardy, Olivier J.
    Holderegger, Rolf
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Waits, Lisette P.
    Manel, Stephanie
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2010, 11 (02) : 375 - 385
  • [93] A comparison of individual-based genetic distance metrics for landscape genetics
    Shirk, A. J.
    Landguth, E. L.
    Cushman, S. A.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2017, 17 (06) : 1308 - 1317
  • [94] The effect of gene flow from unsampled demes in landscape genetic analysis
    Shirk, Andrew J.
    Landguth, Erin L.
    Cushman, Samuel A.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2021, 21 (02) : 394 - 403
  • [95] A comparison of regression methods for model selection in individual-based landscape genetic analysis
    Shirk, Andrew J.
    Landguth, Erin L.
    Cushman, Samuel A.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2018, 18 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [96] Movement ecology of amphibians: from individual migratory behaviour to spatially structured populations in heterogeneous landscapes
    Sinsch, Ulrich
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2014, 92 (06) : 491 - 502
  • [97] New polymorphic microsatellite loci for the Macedonian crested newt, Triturus macedonicus, and cross-priming testing in four other crested newt species
    Sotiropoulos, K.
    Tsaparis, D.
    Eleftherakos, K.
    Kotoulas, G.
    Legakis, A.
    Kasapidis, P.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2008, 8 (06) : 1402 - 1404
  • [98] Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics
    Storfer, A.
    Murphy, M. A.
    Evans, J. S.
    Goldberg, C. S.
    Robinson, S.
    Spear, S. F.
    Dezzani, R.
    Delmelle, E.
    Vierling, L.
    Waits, L. P.
    [J]. HEREDITY, 2007, 98 (03) : 128 - 142
  • [99] Navigating the Interface Between Landscape Genetics and Landscape Genomics
    Storfer, Andrew
    Patton, Austin
    Fraik, Alexandra K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2018, 9
  • [100] Landscape genetics: where are we now?
    Storfer, Andrew
    Murphy, Melanie A.
    Spear, Stephen F.
    Holderegger, Rolf
    Waits, Lisette P.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2010, 19 (17) : 3496 - 3514