A knowledge framework for blockchain-enabled smart contract adoption in the construction industry

被引:10
作者
Weerapperuma, Umesha Sasanthi [1 ]
Rathnasinghe, Akila Pramodh [2 ]
Jayasena, Himal Suranga [1 ]
Wijewickrama, Chamitha Sanjani [3 ]
Thurairajah, Niraj [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Moratuwa, Dept Bldg Econ, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
[2] Northumbria Univ, Fac Engn & Environm, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, Australia
关键词
Blockchain; Construction industry (CI); Diffusion of innovation; Innovation adoption; Knowledge management; Smart contracts; INNOVATION; ENVIRONMENT; TECHNOLOGY; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-01-2023-0012
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
PurposeA novel facet of the construction industry's (CI) digital transformation relates to the rise of smart contracts, and the contribution of blockchain technology in this domain appears to be nascent but rapidly gaining traction. Although the benefits of digitalisation for technologically less enthusiastic CI are irrefutable, the adoption of smart contracts has been found to be low pertaining to industry professionals' behavioural factors stimulated by technological perception. The challenge undertook by this study, therefore, is to develop a knowledge framework for blockchain-enabled smart contract adoption in the CI.Design/methodology/approachFrom a methodological perspective, this study employed a qualitative approach that involved semi-structured interviews with ten (10) highly experienced CI practitioners involved in digital innovations for data collection. Directed content analysis was performed using NVivo 12 software, which enabled the creation of preliminary open codes. Subsequently, these open codes were grouped into similar categories to develop axial codes. Finally, the study presented final themes along with their corresponding descriptions.FindingsNotably, research findings expanded the current body of knowledge on perceived attributes and their measurement items to determine the perception of innovation adoption in CI, where a total of nine (9) perceived attributes were associated with thirty-two (32) measurement items.Originality/valueThe measurement items were seen as having an extensive impact on the CI professionals' decision to adopt blockchain-enabled smart contracts. With ensuing implications, this study represents one of the first to present a knowledge framework exclusively customised for blockchain-enabled smart contracts, laying the groundwork for effective technological adoption by CI professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 408
页数:35
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   The professionals' perspective on the causes of project delay in the construction industry [J].
Agyekum-Mensah, George ;
Knight, Andrew David .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (05) :828-841
[2]   Some aspects of an analytical framework for studying the diffusion of organizational innovations [J].
Alange, S ;
Jacobsson, S ;
Jarnehammar, A .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 1998, 10 (01) :3-21
[3]  
Altay H., 2020, Proceedings of the ARCOM Doctoral Workshop: Exploring the mutual role of BIM, Blockchain and IoT in changing the design, construction and operation of built assets, P12
[4]   Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis [J].
Azungah, Theophilus .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (04) :383-400
[5]   Technological, organisational and environmental determinants of smart contracts adoption: UK construction sector viewpoint [J].
Badi, Sulafa ;
Ochieng, Edward ;
Nasaj, Mohamed ;
Papadaki, Maria .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (01) :36-54
[6]  
Borhani A.S., 2016, Individual and Organizational Factors Influencing Technology Adoption for Construction Safety
[7]   Factors Affecting Organizations' Resistance to the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Networks [J].
Choi, Daeheon ;
Chung, Chune Young ;
Seyha, Thou ;
Young, Jason .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (21) :1-37
[8]  
Chui-Yu Chiu, 2017, International Journal of Management, Economics & Social Sciences, V6, P14
[9]  
Connelly Lynne M, 2016, Medsurg Nurs, V25, P435
[10]  
Creswell J.W., 2019, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches