The Application of Open Science Potentials in Research Processes: A Comprehensive Literature Review

被引:2
作者
Zarghani, Maryam [3 ]
Nemati-Anaraki, Leila [1 ,2 ]
Sedghi, Shahram [1 ,2 ]
Chakoli, Abdolreza Noroozi [4 ]
Rowhani-Farid, Anisa [5 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth Management & Med Informat Sci, Dept Med Lib & Informat Sci, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Hlth Management Res Inst, Hlth Management & Econ Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth Management & Med Informat Sci, Med Lib & Informat Sci, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahed Univ, Dept Informat Sci & Knowledge Studies, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Maryland, Dept Pharmaceut Hlth Serv Res, Sch Pharm, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
LIBRI-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION STUDIES | 2023年 / 73卷 / 02期
关键词
open research; open science; open science practices; research processes; DATA ISSUES; HEALTH; TRANSPARENCY; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1515/libri-2022-0007
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive literature review of the dimensions of open science in research processes. A total of four databases and snowball searching were used for the comprehensive literature review during 2011-2020; then, we were able to find 98 studies based on the inclusion criteria. Also, we used thematic method to review the relevant studies and identified three categories of dimensions in the research process, namely (1) the publication and sharing category including open access, open data, transparency and reproducibility, citizen science, and crowd sourcing; (2) the infrastructure and cultural category including open infrastructure, open education, open tools, budget mechanism, open culture, and communication; and (3) governance and evaluation including policies, governance, and the ethical principles associated with open science. Open science emphasizes the efforts to open and make the scientific research process more inclusive so as to engage the inside and outside actors in the research process.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 186
页数:20
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] Akterian S. G., 2017, BIOMEDICAL REV, V28, P125, DOI [10.14748/bmr.v28.4459, DOI 10.14748/BMR.V28.4459]
  • [2] Albornoz D., 2018, FRAMING POWER TRACIN
  • [3] When Data Sharing Gets Close to 100%: What Human Paleogenetics Can Teach the Open Science Movement
    Anagnostou, Paolo
    Capocasa, Marco
    Milia, Nicola
    Sanna, Emanuele
    Battaggia, Cinzia
    Luzi, Daniela
    Bisol, Giovanni Destro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [4] Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research
    Anderson, Melissa S.
    Ronning, Emily A.
    De Vries, Raymond
    Martinson, Brian C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 81 (03) : 366 - +
  • [5] San Francisco Statement of DORA Research Assessment. Putting science in research evaluation
    不详
    [J]. CIC-CUADERNOS DE INFORMACION Y COMUNICACION, 2020, 25 : 279 - 283
  • [6] Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing
    Austin C.C.
    Bloom T.
    Dallmeier-Tiessen S.
    Khodiyar V.K.
    Murphy F.
    Nurnberger A.
    Raymond L.
    Stockhause M.
    Tedds J.
    Vardigan M.
    Whyte A.
    [J]. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2017, 18 (2) : 77 - 92
  • [7] Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices
    Banks, George C.
    Field, James G.
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    O'Boyle, Ernest H.
    Landis, Ronald S.
    Rupp, Deborah E.
    Rogelberg, Steven G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [8] Bezuidenhout L., 2020, F1000RESEARCH, V9, P1292, DOI [10.12688/f1000research.26615.2, DOI 10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.26615.2]
  • [9] "Ethics When You Least Expect It": A Modular Approach to Short Course Data Ethics Instruction
    Bezuidenhout, Louise
    Quick, Robert
    Shanahan, Hugh
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2020, 26 (04) : 2189 - 2213
  • [10] Borgerud C, 2020, ARCH SCI-NETHERLANDS, V20, P279, DOI 10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3