Cryptocurrency return predictability: What is the role of the environment?

被引:24
作者
Clark, Ephraim [1 ]
Lahiani, Amine [2 ,3 ]
Mefteh-Wali, Salma [4 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Business Sch, London, England
[2] LEO Lab Econ Orleans, Orleans, France
[3] South Ural State Univ, Chelyabinsk, Russia
[4] ESSCA Sch Management, Finance, Angers, France
关键词
Cryptocurrency; Environmental issues; Sustainability; Public attention; Predictability; STOCK RETURNS; BITCOIN; PERFORMANCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122350
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the lead-lag relationship across the returns of four cryptocurrencies - Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether and TrueUSD. It identifies the important role of the environment in forecasting the cryptocurrency returns. The study compares the predictive ability of environmental variables such as temperature anomalies and CO2 emissions with that of commodities i.e. Gold and WTI returns. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first attempt to investigate the leading role of the environment in predicting cryptocurrency returns. Most studies in the literature examine the environmental cost of Bitcoin, but none has considered the possible causal effect of the environment on Bitcoin returns. Our results show evidence of limited predictive power of lagged commodity returns, while lagged CO2 emissions significantly predict the returns of volatile cryptocurrencies, i.e. Bitcoin and Ethereum. On the other hand, environmental variables do not show any predictive power in the returns of stable coins (Tether and TrueUSD). Our findings highlight the increased awareness regarding the degradation of the environment and rapid climate change. Our results have important policy implications.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Twitter-Based uncertainty and cryptocurrency returns [J].
Aharon, David Y. ;
Demir, Ender ;
Lau, Chi Keung Marco ;
Zaremba, Adam .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 59
[2]   Stock return predictability: Is it there? [J].
Ang, Andrew ;
Bekaert, Geert .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2007, 20 (03) :651-707
[3]   Effects of the geopolitical risks on Bitcoin returns and volatility [J].
Aysan, Ahmet Faruk ;
Demir, Ender ;
Gozgor, Giray ;
Lau, Chi Keung Marco .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2019, 47 :511-518
[4]   Nonlinear nexus between cryptocurrency returns and COVID-19 news sentiment [J].
Banerjee, Ameet Kumar ;
Akhtaruzzaman, Md ;
Dionisio, Andreia ;
Almeida, Dora ;
Sensoy, Ahmet .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2022, 36
[5]   The Bitcoin gold correlation puzzle [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
Hoang, Lai .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2021, 32
[6]   Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
Hong, KiHoon ;
Lee, Adrian D. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2018, 54 :177-189
[7]  
Bolton P., 2021, Global pricing of carbon-transition risk, DOI [10.3386/w28510, DOI 10.3386/W28510]
[8]   Do investors care about carbon risk? [J].
Bolton, Patrick ;
Kacperczyk, Marcin .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 142 (02) :517-549
[9]   Cryptocurrencies as hedges and safe-havens for US equity sectors [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain ;
Roubaud, David .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 75 :294-307
[10]   Herding behaviour in cryptocurrencies [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Roubaud, David .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 :216-221