Socio-economic segregation in European cities. A comparative study of Brussels, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Oslo and Stockholm

被引:54
作者
Haandrikman, Karen [1 ]
Costa, Rafael [2 ,4 ]
Malmberg, Bo [1 ]
Rogne, Adrian Farner [4 ]
Sleutjes, Bart [3 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Human Geog, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Interface Demog, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Groningen, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demog Inst NIDI KNA, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Sociol & Human Geog, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Socio-economic segregation; comparative studies; European capitals; nearest-neighbor approach; RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION; ETHNIC SEGREGATION; SPATIAL SEGREGATION; MULTISCALAR APPROACH; HOUSING ALLOCATION; PATTERNS; SWEDEN; GENTRIFICATION; NEIGHBORHOODS; NETHERLANDS;
D O I
10.1080/02723638.2021.1959778
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to compare socioeconomic segregation patterns and levels in Brussels, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Oslo, and Stockholm with uniform measurements. Previous research has been hampered by conceptual and methodological shortcomings. We use harmonized datasets containing geocoded indicators based on a nearest-neighbors approach. Our analyses offer an unprecedented comparison of patterns and levels of socio-spatial inequalities in European capitals at multiple scales. Using maps, segregation indices and percentile plots, we find that for all cities, the segregation of the rich is much stronger than the segregation of the poor. Macro-scale poverty segregation is most prominent in Stockholm and Brussels, and quite low in Amsterdam, while macro-scale affluence segregation is most pronounced in Oslo. At micro-scales, Brussels and Stockholm stand out with very high local poverty concentrations, indicating high levels of polarization. We interpret differences in the light of spatial inequalities, welfare regimes, housing systems, migration and area-based interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 36
页数:36
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Changing welfare states and social housing:: Consequences for spatial segregation -: reviewed
    Abramsson, M
    Borgegård, LE
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN HOUSING & PLANNING RESEARCH, 1998, 15 (03): : 149 - 173
  • [2] Andersen, 2002, THEOR SOC, V19, P153, DOI [10.1080/140360902321122860, DOI 10.1080/140360902321122860]
  • [3] The impact of housing policies and housing markets on ethnic spatial segregation: comparing the capital cities of four Nordic welfare states
    Andersen, Hans Skifter
    Andersson, Roger
    Wessel, Terje
    Vilkama, Katja
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOUSING POLICY, 2016, 16 (01): : 1 - 30
  • [4] Andersen HansSkifter., 2000, GEOGR TIDSSKR-DEN, V100, P71, DOI [10.1080/00167223.2000.10649440, DOI 10.1080/00167223.2000.10649440]
  • [5] From valley of sadness to hill of happiness: The significance of surroundings for socioeconomic career
    Andersson, E
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2004, 41 (03) : 641 - 659
  • [6] A Comparative Study of Segregation Patterns in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden: Neighbourhood Concentration and Representation of Non-European Migrants
    Andersson, Eva K.
    Malmberg, Bo
    Costa, Rafael
    Sleutjes, Bart
    Stonawski, Marcin Jan
    de Valk, Helga A. G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POPULATION, 2018, 34 (02) : 251 - 275
  • [7] Comparing Patterns of Segregation in North-Western Europe: A Multiscalar Approach
    Andersson, Eva K.
    Lyngstad, Torkild Hovde
    Sleutjes, Bart
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POPULATION-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE DEMOGRAPHIE, 2018, 34 (02): : 151 - 168
  • [8] Contextual effects on educational attainment in individualised, scalable neighbourhoods: Differences across gender and social class
    Andersson, Eva K.
    Malmberg, Bo
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2015, 52 (12) : 2117 - 2133
  • [9] Andersson R, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P361, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_16
  • [10] Segregation, gentrification, and residualisation: from public housing to market-driven housing allocation in inner city Stockholm
    Andersson, Roger
    Turner, Lena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOUSING POLICY, 2014, 14 (01): : 3 - 29