Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes

被引:2
作者
Castricini, Roberto [1 ]
Mercurio, Michele [2 ]
Galasso, Olimpio [2 ]
Sanzo, Valentina [2 ]
De Gori, Marco [3 ]
De Benedetto, Massimo [1 ]
Orlando, Nicola [1 ]
Gasparini, Giorgio [2 ]
机构
[1] Villa Verde, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Fermo, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Mater Domini Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Catanzaro, Italy
[3] Basso Ionio Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Soverato, Italy
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; glenoid bone loss; femoral head allograft; 3-dimensional (3D) model; patient-specific instru- mentation; bone graft; baseplate failure; GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS; DEFECTS; MANAGEMENT; CUFF; B3; B2;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.027
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption. Results: After a median follow-up of 26.5 months ( 24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22 degrees (10 degrees-31 degrees) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8 degrees (16.5 degrees-33.5 degrees) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5 degrees (-23 degrees to -12 degrees) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7 degrees (2.2 degrees-1.5 degrees) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4 degrees retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery. Conclusion: The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sexand age -matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study (c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e58 / e67
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Lorenzetti Adam, 2017, JB JS Open Access, V2, pe0015, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00015
  • [32] Factors contributing to glenoid baseplate micromotion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study
    Lung, Tiffany S.
    Cruickshank, David
    Grant, Heather J.
    Rainbow, Michael J.
    Bryant, Timothy J.
    Bicknell, Ryan T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) : 648 - 653
  • [33] An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years
    Melis, B.
    DeFranco, M.
    Laedermann, A.
    Mole, D.
    Favard, L.
    Nerot, C.
    Maynou, C.
    Walch, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (09): : 1240 - 1246
  • [34] Better functional outcomes and a lower infection rate can be expected after superior capsular reconstruction in comparison with latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a systematic review
    Mercurio, Michele
    Castricini, Roberto
    Castioni, Davide
    Cofano, Erminia
    Familiari, Filippo
    Gasparini, Giorgio
    Galasso, Olimpio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (04) : 892 - 906
  • [35] The 50 Highest Cited Papers on Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Mercurio, Michele
    Cofano, Erminia
    Familiari, Filippo
    Corona, Katia
    Cerciello, Simone
    Gasparini, Giorgio
    Galasso, Olimpio
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [36] Outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic shoulder infection: a systematic review
    Mercurio, Michele
    Castioni, Davide
    Ianno, Bruno
    Gasparini, Giorgio
    Galasso, Olimpio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (06) : 1193 - 1203
  • [37] Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
    Nabergoj, Marko
    Neyton, Lionel
    Bothorel, Hugo
    Ho, Sean W. L.
    Wang, Sidi
    Chong, Xue Ling
    Ladermann, Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [38] Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis
    Nyffeler, RW
    Werner, CML
    Gerber, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2005, 14 (05) : 524 - 528
  • [39] Custom-made reverse shoulder arthroplasty for severe glenoid bone loss: review of the literature and our preliminary results
    Porcellini, G.
    Micheloni, G. M.
    Tarallo, L.
    Paladini, P.
    Merolla, G.
    Catani, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [40] Complication rates comparing primary with revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Gupta, Anil K.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (11) : 1647 - 1654