Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes

被引:2
作者
Castricini, Roberto [1 ]
Mercurio, Michele [2 ]
Galasso, Olimpio [2 ]
Sanzo, Valentina [2 ]
De Gori, Marco [3 ]
De Benedetto, Massimo [1 ]
Orlando, Nicola [1 ]
Gasparini, Giorgio [2 ]
机构
[1] Villa Verde, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Fermo, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Mater Domini Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Catanzaro, Italy
[3] Basso Ionio Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Soverato, Italy
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; glenoid bone loss; femoral head allograft; 3-dimensional (3D) model; patient-specific instru- mentation; bone graft; baseplate failure; GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS; DEFECTS; MANAGEMENT; CUFF; B3; B2;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.027
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption. Results: After a median follow-up of 26.5 months ( 24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22 degrees (10 degrees-31 degrees) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8 degrees (16.5 degrees-33.5 degrees) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5 degrees (-23 degrees to -12 degrees) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7 degrees (2.2 degrees-1.5 degrees) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4 degrees retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery. Conclusion: The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sexand age -matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study (c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e58 / e67
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Use of Allografts in Orthopaedic Surgery: Safety, Procurement, Storage, and Outcomes
    Beer, Adam J.
    Tauro, Tracy M.
    Redondo, Michael L.
    Christian, David R.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (12)
  • [2] Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion
    Boileau, Pascal
    Morin-Salvo, Nicolas
    Gauci, Marc-Olivier
    Seeto, Brian L.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Holzer, Nicolas
    Walch, Gilles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (12) : 2133 - 2142
  • [3] Burns David M, 2019, Shoulder Elbow, V11, P16, DOI 10.1177/1758573218806252
  • [4] Health-related quality of life and functionality after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Castricini, Roberto
    Gasparini, Giorgio
    Di Luggo, Francesco
    De Benedetto, Massimo
    De Gori, Marco
    Galasso, Olimpio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (12) : 1639 - 1649
  • [5] Bone-Graft Resorption Reduced by the Induced Membrane Technique and Factors Affecting Volumetric Changes: An Analysis of 120 Serial Computed Tomographic Scans in 40 Patients
    Cho, Jae-Woo
    Kent, William T.
    Oh, Chang-Wug
    Kim, Beom-Soo
    Cho, Won-Tae
    Oh, Jong-Keon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (14) : 1269 - 1278
  • [6] Choi Chang-Hyuk, 2020, Clin Shoulder Elb, V23, P119, DOI 10.5397/cise.2020.00220
  • [7] CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
  • [8] Treatment of severe glenoid deficiencies in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: the Glenius Glenoid Reconstruction System experience
    Debeer, Philippe
    Berghs, Bart
    Pouliart, Nicole
    Van den Bogaert, Gert
    Verhaegen, Filip
    Nijs, Stefaan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (08) : 1601 - 1608
  • [9] Finite element analysis of glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Lederman, Evan
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (07) : 1548 - 1555
  • [10] Comparisons of Efficacy between Autograft and Allograft on Defect Repair In Vivo in Normal and Osteoporotic Rats
    Dreyer, Chris H.
    Rasmussen, Marina
    Pedersen, Rasmus Hestehave
    Overgaard, Soren
    Ding, Ming
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020