Pooled analysis of three pharmacokinetic studies comparing biosimilar MB02 and reference bevacizumab

被引:0
|
作者
Miguel-Lillo, B. [1 ]
Sanchez-Vidaurre, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Diaz, L. Perez [1 ]
Paravisini, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] mAbxience Res SL, Med Dept, Madrid, Spain
[2] mAbxience Res SL, Med Dept, Manuel Pombo Angulo 28 St, Madrid 28050, Spain
来源
PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES | 2023年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
bevacizumab; bioequivalence; biosimilar; MB02; pooled analysis; TUMOR-GROWTH; VEGF;
D O I
10.1002/prp2.1139
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AimThe aim of this study was to add robustness and provide further evidence on the bioequivalence, safety and immunogenicity between MB02 and reference bevacizumab. No similar study has been performed before with a biosimilar monoclonal antibody.MethodsPopulation analysis by pooling data from three independent pharmacokinetic (PK) studies was performed. The studies had a single-dose, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group design and two studies, MB02-A-02-17 and MB02-A-05-18, compared MB02 to EU- and US-bevacizumab in Caucasian subjects, while study MB02-A-04-18 compared MB02 and EU-bevacizumab in Japanese participants. Primary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-infinity) and AUC from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). Secondary endpoints included other PK parameters, safety and immunogenicity. A sensitivity analysis using actual protein concentration as a correction factor was applied to primary PK parameters.ResultsPoint estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of primary PK parameters for MB02, EU- and US-bevacizumab were all contained within the predefined bioequivalence margins (80%-125%) for all pairwise comparisons. The same results for all pairwise comparisons were observed when protein-corrected primary PK parameters were analyzed. Safety and immunogenicity were similar between MB02 and the EU- and US-reference bevacizumab in healthy subjects.ConclusionsThis pooled analysis of three comparable PK studies further supports the bioequivalence of biosimilar MB02 to EU- and US-reference bevacizumab. No clinically meaningful differences in safety or immunogenicity were observed. Mean serum concentration-time plots by treatment arms. Arithmetic mean serum concentration-time profiles of MB02 and reference bevacizumab in the pooled studies. Mean serum concentrations versus nominal times on linear (A) and semilogarithmic scale (B) of MB02, EU-bevacizumab, and US-bevacizumab.image
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A three-arm clinical study to compare pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of the denosumab biosimilar LY06006 with reference denosumab in healthy male subjects
    Fuhr, Rainard
    Sun, Xuejiao
    Wang, Xi
    Dong, Ying
    Tai, Joe
    Zhou, Ming
    Dou, Changlin
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2025, 21 (03) : 305 - 313
  • [22] Meta-analysis of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Results of 3 Phase 1 Studies with Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim
    Gattu, Sreekanth
    Wang, Jessie
    Bellon, Anne
    Schelcher, Celine
    Nakov, Roumen
    Arani, Ramin
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 10 (10): : 1130 - 1141
  • [23] A randomized Phase I pharmacokinetic trial comparing the potential biosimilar trastuzumab (SIBP-01) with the reference product (Herceptin®) in healthy Chinese male volunteers
    Zhou, Huan
    Cao, Shugang
    Zhu, Xingyu
    Xie, Jing
    Fan, Ling
    Ge, Qin
    Wang, Ying
    Zhu, Juan
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Shao, ZhongHuan
    Shan, Rongfang
    Liu, Bingyan
    Wang, Hongju
    Ding, Li
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 16 (10) : 997 - 1003
  • [24] Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
    Socinski, Mark A.
    Waller, Cornelius F.
    Idris, Tazeen
    Bondarenko, Igor
    Luft, Alexander
    Beckmann, Katrin
    Vishweswaramurthy, Ashwini
    Loganathan, Subramanian
    Donnelly, Charles
    Hummel, Matthew A.
    Shapiro, Roxann
    Woods, Melody
    Rao, Anita
    Nayak, Vivek G.
    Ranganna, Gopinath
    Barve, Abhijit
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13
  • [25] A case study comparing a meta-analysis and a pooled analysis of studies of sinonasal cancer among wood workers
    Gordon, I
    Boffetta, P
    Demers, PA
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (05) : 518 - 524
  • [26] A multicenter real-world study comparing the clinical equivalence of trastuzumab biosimilar HLX02 and reference trastuzumab in the treatment of HER-2-positive breast cancer
    Deng, Weishang
    Hu, Jia
    Yang, Sensen
    Xie, Zeyu
    Li, Mengting
    Li, Jinjian
    Zhuang, Wenbin
    Chen, Jisheng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (07): : 3113 - 3122
  • [27] A randomized phase-I pharmacokinetic trial comparing the potential biosimilar tocilizumab (QX003S) with the reference product (Actemra(R)) in Chinese healthy subjects
    Zhang, Hong
    Li, Xiaojiao
    Liu, Jingrui
    Li, Cuiyun
    Wu, Min
    Zhu, Xiaoxue
    Sun, Jixuan
    Fang, Min
    Ding, Yanhua
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (01) : 375 - 383
  • [28] Dietary niacin intake and risk of dyslipidemia: A pooled analysis of three prospective cohort studies
    Kim, Chaehyun
    Park, Kyong
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2022, 41 (12) : 2749 - 2758
  • [29] Bioequivalence Studies of Omnitrope, the First Biosimilar/rhGH Follow-on Protein: Two Comparative Phase 1 Randomized Studies and Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis
    Stanhope, Richard
    Soergel, Fritz
    Gravel, Patricia
    Schuetz, Yannic B. Pannatier
    Zabransky, Markus
    Muenzberg, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 50 (11): : 1339 - 1348
  • [30] A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of LY01008, a candidate bevacizumab biosimilar, with its reference product Avastin® in healthy Chinese male subjects
    Zhou, Renpeng
    Yang, Jingjing
    Liu, Yueyue
    Zhang, Qian
    Lu, Chao
    Tang, Ke
    Li, Xiao
    Tang, Wei
    Gao, Emei
    Wu, Can
    Dou, Changlin
    Hu, Wei
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2022, 22 (02) : 263 - 269