Oncological and reproductive outcomes of conization combined with pelvic node evaluation in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Yisi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yali [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Mengyao [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Zhaojuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lingli [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Ai [1 ,2 ]
Han, Ling [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Second Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
conization; pelvic node evaluation; oncological outcome; reproductive outcome; cervical cancer; FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY; RADICAL-TRACHELECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; RISK; PRESERVATION; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1251453
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to preliminarily assess the oncological and reproductive outcomes of fertility preservation treatment using conization combined with pelvic node evaluation in young patients with early-stage cervical cancer (ECC) through meta-analysis. Methods: In this meta-analysis, we analyzed studies published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Clinical Trials. gov that appeared in our search from inception to 0 7/02/2023. Results: There were 17 relevant studies with a total of 620 patients included, of which 444 patients received conization combined with pelvic node evaluation. The combined pregnancy rate was 45.4% (95% CI: 0.34-0.57), the combined live birth rate was 33.9% (95% CI: 0.26-0.42), the combined miscarriage rate was 4.8% (95% CI: 0.02-0.092), the combined preterm delivery rate was 5.1% (95% CI: 0.02-0.092), and the combined recurrence rate was 1.9% (95% CI: 0.006-0.035), which did not significantly differ from that of patients who received radical surgery (OR: 0.689, 95% CI: 0.506-0.938). Conclusion: Cervical conization combined with pelvic lymph node evaluation for fertility preservation in young ECC patients can achieve oncological outcomes similar to radical surgery while improving pregnancy success rates and preserving postoperative fertility. In summary, fertility preservation treatment using cervical conization combined with pelvic lymph node evaluation may be considered as a viable option for young ECC patients with strong fertility preservation desire, resulting in better pregnancy and live birth outcomes. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023423432).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Twenty years of experience with less radical fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: Oncological outcomes
    Hruda, Martin
    Robova, Helena
    Rob, Lukas
    Halaska, Michael J.
    Drozenova, Jana
    Pichlik, Tomas
    Malikova, Hana
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 163 (01) : 100 - 104
  • [42] The oncological and obstetric results of radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing therapy in early-stage cervical cancer patients
    Chen, Tao
    Li, Jia
    Zhu, Yan
    Lu, An-Wei
    Zhou, Li
    Wang, Jian-San
    Zhang, Ying
    Wang, Jun-Tao
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [43] Fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: A case series study on the efficacy and feasibility of cervical conization followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy
    Yamamoto, Mayuko
    Motohara, Takeshi
    Iwagoi, Yutaka
    Tayama, Shingo
    Tashiro, Hironori
    Kondoh, Eiji
    Katabuchi, Hidetaka
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (06) : 1444 - 1450
  • [44] Conization and lymph node evaluation as a fertility-sparing treatment for early stage cervical cancer
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Ditto, Antonino
    Filippi, Francesca
    Vinti, Daniele
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Leone Roberti Maggiore, Umberto
    Evangelista, Mariateresa
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Lopez, Salvatore
    Somigliana, Edgardo
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (03) : 457 - 461
  • [45] Functional outcomes after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cribb, Benjamin, I
    Kong, Joseph
    McCormick, Jacob
    Warrier, Satish K.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (03) : 583 - 595
  • [46] Clinical impact of low-volume lymph node metastases in early-stage cervical cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis
    Guani, Benedetta
    Mahiou, Katia
    Crestani, Adrien
    Cibula, David
    Buda, Alessandro
    Gaillard, Thomas
    Mathevet, Patrice
    Kocian, Roman
    Sniadecki, Marcin
    Wydra, Dariusz G.
    Feki, Anis
    Paoletti, Xavier
    Lecuru, Fabrice
    Balaya, Vincent
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 164 (02) : 446 - 454
  • [47] The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review
    Lai, Jerry Cheng-Yen
    Yang, Ming-Shiang
    Lu, Kuo-Wei
    Yu, Lan
    Liou, Wan-Zu
    Wang, Kung-Liahng
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (05): : 627 - 635
  • [48] Axillary lymph node dissection vs. sentinel node biopsy for early-stage clinically node-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Petousis, Stamatios
    Christidis, Panagiotis
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Liberis, Anastasios
    Vavoulidis, Eleftherios
    Margioula-Siarkou, Georgia
    Vatopoulou, Anastasia
    Papanikolaou, Alexios
    Mavromatidis, George
    Dinas, Konstantinos
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (04) : 1221 - 1234
  • [49] Beta-blockers in early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Caparica, R.
    Bruzzone, M.
    Agostinetto, E.
    De Angelis, C.
    Fede, A.
    Ceppi, M.
    de Azambuja, E.
    ESMO OPEN, 2021, 6 (02)
  • [50] Impact of Obesity on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer after Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic Node Dissection
    Leetanaporn, Kittinun
    Hanprasertpong, Jitti
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 42 (11) : 553 - 562