Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Jeon, Hyun Jeong [1 ]
Lim, Soo Yeun [2 ]
Jeong, Hyejeong [2 ]
Yoon, So Jeong [2 ]
Kim, Hongbeom [2 ]
Shin, Sang Hyun [2 ]
Heo, Jin Seok [2 ]
Han, In Woong [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Chilgok Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Surg,Div Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Daegu 41404, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Div Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Dept Surg, Samsung Med Ctr,Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
borderline resectable pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment; upfront surgery; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; THERAPY; GEMCITABINE; DEFINITION; FOLFIRINOX; INVASION; CHEMOTHERAPY; CONSENSUS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines11082302
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
According to the 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) should receive chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. This study examined the real-world survival benefits of modifying BRPC treatment guidelines. Patients treated for BRPC at a single institution from 2013 to 2015 (pre-guideline group) and 2017 to 2019 (post-guideline group) were retrospectively reviewed. According to the treatment method used, patients were classified into upfront surgery (US), surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), and chemotherapy only (CO) groups. Overall survival (OS) was compared according to period and treatment type. Factors associated with OS were analyzed using a Cox regression model. Among the 165 patients, 63 were in the pre-guideline group and 102 patients were in the post-guideline group. The median OS was significantly improved in the post-guideline group compared to the pre-guideline group (29 vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). According to the treatment method, the median OS of the NAT group was significantly longer than that of the US and CO groups (40 vs. 16 vs. 15 months, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, differentiation, NAT, and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors. NAT is an important treatment option for BRPC and increased patient survival in the real world.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Pancreatic Head Cancer with Portal Venous Involvement Really Borderline Resectable? Appraisal of an Upfront Surgery Series
    Ohgi, Katsuhisa
    Yamamoto, Yusuke
    Sugiura, Teiichi
    Okamura, Yukiyasu
    Ito, Takaaki
    Ashida, Ryo
    Aramaki, Takeshi
    Uesaka, Katsuhiko
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (09) : 2752 - 2761
  • [32] Long-term survival benefit of upfront chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Shrestha, Bikram
    Sun, Yifei
    Faisal, Farzana
    Kim, Victoria
    Soares, Kevin
    Blair, Alex
    Herman, Joseph M.
    Narang, Amol
    Dholakia, Avani S.
    Rosati, Lauren
    Hacker-Prietz, Amy
    Chen, Linda
    Laheru, Daniel A.
    De Jesus-Acosta, Ana
    Le, Dung T.
    Donehower, Ross
    Azad, Nilofar
    Diaz, Luis A.
    Murphy, Adrian
    Lee, Valerie
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    Hruban, Ralph H.
    Liang, Tingbo
    Cameron, John L.
    Makary, Martin
    Weiss, Matthew J.
    Ahuja, Nita
    He, Jin
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Huang, Chiung-Yu
    Zheng, Lei
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (07): : 1552 - 1562
  • [33] Neoadjuvant Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival in Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Chawla, Akhil
    Molina, George
    Pak, Linda M.
    Rosenthal, Michael
    Mancias, Joseph D.
    Clancy, Thomas E.
    Wolpin, Brian M.
    Wang, Jiping
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (04) : 1191 - 1200
  • [34] Radiographic patterns of first disease recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Barnes, Chad A.
    Aldakkak, Mohammed
    Christians, Kathleen K.
    Clarke, Callisia N.
    Dua, Kulwinder
    George, Ben
    Ritch, Paul S.
    Kamgar, Mandana
    Hall, William A.
    Kulkarni, Naveen
    Erickson, Beth A.
    Evans, Douglas B.
    Tsai, Susan
    SURGERY, 2020, 168 (03) : 440 - 447
  • [35] Resectable pancreatic adenocarcinomas: will neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX replace upfront surgery in the standard of care?
    Antonios, Amine
    Gharios, Joseph
    Tohme, Cyril
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (11) : 951 - 953
  • [36] Neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Outcomes in the era of changing practices and evolving evidence
    Chaudhari, Vikram A.
    Mitra, Abhishek
    Gupta, Vikas
    Ostwal, Vikas
    Ramaswamy, Anant
    Engineer, Reena
    Sirohi, Bhawna
    Shetty, Nitin
    Bal, Munita
    DeSouza, Ashwin
    Bhandare, Manish S.
    Shrikhande, Shailesh, V
    SURGERY, 2022, 171 (06) : 1388 - 1395
  • [37] Outcome of Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer in the Contemporary Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Javed, Ammar A.
    Wright, Michael J.
    Siddique, Ayat
    Blair, Alex B.
    Ding, Ding
    Burkhart, Richard A.
    Makary, Martin
    Cameron, John L.
    Narang, Amol
    Herman, Joseph
    Zheng, Lei
    Laheru, Daniel
    Weiss, Matthew J.
    Wolfgang, Christopher
    He, Jin
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (01) : 112 - 121
  • [38] Comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatments in patients with resectable, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    He, Jiaxin
    Lv, Na
    Yang, Zhenyi
    Luo, Yixuan
    Zhong, Wen
    Wu, Chunli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (06) : 3900 - 3909
  • [39] Neoadjuvant treatment for borderline and resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Alvarez, R.
    Ales, I.
    Diaz, R.
    de Paredes, B. G.
    Hidalgo, M.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (10): : 1193 - 1198
  • [40] Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    di Sebastiano, Pierluigi
    Grottola, Tommaso
    di Mola, F. Francesco
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2016, 68 (03) : 235 - 239