Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology

被引:1
|
作者
Hugon-Rodin, Justine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Casini, Alessandro [4 ]
Benard, Julie [5 ]
Poncet, Antoine [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Raverot, Veronique [9 ,10 ]
Fontana, Pierre [4 ]
Vulliemoz, Nicolas [11 ]
Streuli, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Dept Femme Enfantet Adolescent DFEA Ob Gyn Reprod, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Hosp St Joseph, INSERM, U1153, Gynaecol Endocrinol Unit,EPOPE Grp,Gynecol Dept, Paris, France
[4] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Angiol & Haemostasis, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Child & Adolescent Med, Div Gynecol, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Geneva, Dept Hlth & Community Med, CRC & Div Clin Epidemiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[7] Univ Geneva, Div Clin Epidemiol, Dept Hlth & Community Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[8] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[9] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biochim & Biol Mol, Hormonol, Bron, France
[10] Univ Lyon, INSERM, UMRS 102, Neurosci Res Ctr,Waking Team, Bron, France
[11] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Mother Child, Fertil Med & Gynaecol Endocrinol, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
thrombin generation; hypercoagulability biomarkers; agonist trigger; controlled ovarian stimulation; and in vitro fertilization; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; THROMBIN GENERATION; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; THROMBOEMBOLISM; ESTRADIOL; ESTROGEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of 3 different ovarian stimulation protocols on surrogate biomarkers of coagulation. Design: Observational multicenter cohort study. Setting: The study was conducted in assisted reproductive technology (ART) units. Patients: Infertile women undergoing ART in 2017-2019 were included. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Our primary outcome was the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram. The ETP was measured at baseline (T1), on the day of ovulation triggering (T2), and 7 days after triggering (T3). Three protocols were prescribed according to the standards used and without hormonal before treatment: agonist protocol with human cho-rionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger (ag-hCG), antagonist protocol with hCG trigger (atg-hCG), or GnRH agonist trigger. The evolution of ETP was compared among groups using a mixed-effects linear regression model. Result(s): Sixty-four women with a mean age of 37.8 years participated in the study: of which 24, 16, 24 received ag-hCG, atg-hCG, and GnRH agonist triggers, respectively. As expected, the mean serum estradiol levels in GnRH agonist trigger were statistically higher at T2 and lower at T3 than that for both ag-hCG and atg-hCG. Overall, the ETP evolution over time was statistically different between the groups. Values were similar between groups at T1 and increased at T2 in each group. The greatest difference occurred between T2 and T3 in each group. The ETP continued to increase at T3 in ag-hCG (+110 nM/L x min) and atg-hCG (+171 nM/L x min), but it remained stable in GnRH agonist trigger (-2 nM/L x min). Sex hormone-binding globulin showed persistent increase at T3 despite the fall in estradiol levels, particularly in the GnRH agonist trigger group. Conclusion(s): The ag-hCG and atg-hCG groups were associated with a higher hypercoagulable state at T3 than the GnRH agonist trigger group. However, our results show the persistence of a hypercoagulable state after the GnRH agonist triggering despite a sharp drop in estradiol levels. These findings may support the use of GnRH agonist trigger protocol in patients with high thrombotic risk and gives new insight into the fact that coagulation parameters could be disturbed for long time periods. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04188444 (Fertil Steril (R) 2023;119:976-84. (c) 2023 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 984
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomarkers at 6 weeks' gestation in the prediction of early miscarriage in pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology
    Guo, Jun
    Feng, Qiaoli
    Chaemsaithong, Piya
    Appiah, Kubi
    Sahota, Daljit S.
    Leung, Bo Wah
    Chung, Jacqueline P.
    Li, Tin Chiu
    Poon, Liona C.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (08) : 1073 - 1083
  • [42] Cabergoline for Reducing Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment Cycles A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Amir, Hadar
    Yaniv, Dan
    Hasson, Joseph
    Amit, Ami
    Gordon, David
    Azem, Foad
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 60 (1-2) : 48 - 54
  • [43] Severity of Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Chance of Success with Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Kawwass, Jennifer Fay
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Hipp, Heather S.
    Session, Donna R.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 62 (3-4) : 153 - 160
  • [44] Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology
    Alviggi, Carlo
    Humaidan, Peter
    Howles, Colin M.
    Tredway, Donald
    Hillier, Stephen G.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2009, 7 : 101
  • [45] Hypoparathyroidism and assisted reproductive technology: considerations while undergoing ovarian hyperstimulation
    Arkfeld, Christopher K.
    Mannstadt, Michael
    Mahalingaiah, Shruthi
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2024, 31 (06) : 197 - 202
  • [46] Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Alessandro Conforti
    Sandro C. Esteves
    Peter Humaidan
    Salvatore Longobardi
    Thomas D’Hooghe
    Raoul Orvieto
    Alberto Vaiarelli
    Danilo Cimadomo
    Laura Rienzi
    Filippo Maria Ubaldi
    Fulvio Zullo
    Carlo Alviggi
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 19
  • [47] Optimization of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: updates and unanswered questions
    Fitz, Victoria W.
    Mahalingaiah, Shruthi
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2022, 29 (06) : 547 - 553
  • [48] Impact of Progesterone on Inhibins during Controlled Ovarian Stimulation
    Ye Jing
    Chen Qiu-Ju
    He Wen
    Zhang Jie
    Ye Hong-Juan
    Fu Yong-Lun
    Lyu Qi-Feng
    Kuang Yan-Ping
    生殖与发育医学(英文), 2017, 1 (02) : 69 - 70-71-72-73-74-75-76
  • [49] Association of Assisted Reproductive Technology and Stroke During Hospitalization for Delivery in the United States
    Dicpinigaitis, Alis J.
    Seitz, Alison
    Berkin, Jill
    Al-Mufti, Fawaz
    Kamel, Hooman
    Navi, Babak B.
    Pawar, Anokhi
    White, Halina
    Liberman, Ava L.
    STROKE, 2024, 55 (04) : 999 - 1005
  • [50] GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF
    Magdalena Piróg
    Olga Kacalska-Janssen
    Robert Jach
    Jakub Wyroba
    Bartosz Chrostowski
    Michał Ząbczyk
    Joanna Natorska
    Reproductive Sciences, 2022, 29 : 3521 - 3531