Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology

被引:1
|
作者
Hugon-Rodin, Justine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Casini, Alessandro [4 ]
Benard, Julie [5 ]
Poncet, Antoine [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Raverot, Veronique [9 ,10 ]
Fontana, Pierre [4 ]
Vulliemoz, Nicolas [11 ]
Streuli, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Dept Femme Enfantet Adolescent DFEA Ob Gyn Reprod, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Hosp St Joseph, INSERM, U1153, Gynaecol Endocrinol Unit,EPOPE Grp,Gynecol Dept, Paris, France
[4] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Angiol & Haemostasis, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Child & Adolescent Med, Div Gynecol, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Geneva, Dept Hlth & Community Med, CRC & Div Clin Epidemiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[7] Univ Geneva, Div Clin Epidemiol, Dept Hlth & Community Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[8] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[9] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biochim & Biol Mol, Hormonol, Bron, France
[10] Univ Lyon, INSERM, UMRS 102, Neurosci Res Ctr,Waking Team, Bron, France
[11] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Mother Child, Fertil Med & Gynaecol Endocrinol, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
thrombin generation; hypercoagulability biomarkers; agonist trigger; controlled ovarian stimulation; and in vitro fertilization; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; THROMBIN GENERATION; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; THROMBOEMBOLISM; ESTRADIOL; ESTROGEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of 3 different ovarian stimulation protocols on surrogate biomarkers of coagulation. Design: Observational multicenter cohort study. Setting: The study was conducted in assisted reproductive technology (ART) units. Patients: Infertile women undergoing ART in 2017-2019 were included. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Our primary outcome was the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram. The ETP was measured at baseline (T1), on the day of ovulation triggering (T2), and 7 days after triggering (T3). Three protocols were prescribed according to the standards used and without hormonal before treatment: agonist protocol with human cho-rionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger (ag-hCG), antagonist protocol with hCG trigger (atg-hCG), or GnRH agonist trigger. The evolution of ETP was compared among groups using a mixed-effects linear regression model. Result(s): Sixty-four women with a mean age of 37.8 years participated in the study: of which 24, 16, 24 received ag-hCG, atg-hCG, and GnRH agonist triggers, respectively. As expected, the mean serum estradiol levels in GnRH agonist trigger were statistically higher at T2 and lower at T3 than that for both ag-hCG and atg-hCG. Overall, the ETP evolution over time was statistically different between the groups. Values were similar between groups at T1 and increased at T2 in each group. The greatest difference occurred between T2 and T3 in each group. The ETP continued to increase at T3 in ag-hCG (+110 nM/L x min) and atg-hCG (+171 nM/L x min), but it remained stable in GnRH agonist trigger (-2 nM/L x min). Sex hormone-binding globulin showed persistent increase at T3 despite the fall in estradiol levels, particularly in the GnRH agonist trigger group. Conclusion(s): The ag-hCG and atg-hCG groups were associated with a higher hypercoagulable state at T3 than the GnRH agonist trigger group. However, our results show the persistence of a hypercoagulable state after the GnRH agonist triggering despite a sharp drop in estradiol levels. These findings may support the use of GnRH agonist trigger protocol in patients with high thrombotic risk and gives new insight into the fact that coagulation parameters could be disturbed for long time periods. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04188444 (Fertil Steril (R) 2023;119:976-84. (c) 2023 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 984
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized comparison of different ovarian stimulation regimens for assisted reproductive technology in baboons (Papio anubis)
    Nyachieo, Atunga
    Spiessens, Carl
    Chai, Daniel C.
    Debrock, Sophie
    Mwenda, Jason M.
    d'Hooghe, Thomas M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (04) : 1354 - 1359
  • [22] The effect of metabolic syndrome on controlled ovarian stimulation outcome in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Moini, Ashraf
    Rezaee, Tawoos
    Aleyasin, Ashraf
    Arabipoor, Arezoo
    Moayed, Marzieh Eslami
    ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2023, 67 (01): : 111 - 118
  • [23] Role and effectiveness of progestins in pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
    Yildiz, Sule
    Turkgeldi, Engin
    Ata, Baris
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 75 (06) : 573 - 582
  • [24] GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF
    Pirog, Magdalena
    Kacalska-Janssen, Olga
    Jach, Robert
    Wyroba, Jakub
    Chrostowski, Bartosz
    Zabczyk, Michal
    Natorska, Joanna
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (12) : 3521 - 3531
  • [25] Effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology on ovarian response
    Kelly, SM
    Buckett, WM
    Tan, SL
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (03) : 219 - 224
  • [26] Progestins versus GnRH analogues for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alexandru, Polexa
    Cekic, Sebile Guler
    Yildiz, Sule
    Turkgeldi, Engin
    Ata, Baris
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 40 (06) : 894 - 903
  • [27] Intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation is a successful step prior to assisted reproductive technology for couples with unexplained infertility
    Osmanlioglu, Seyma
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Tokgoz, Vehbi Yavuz
    Ozmen, Batuhan
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Berker, Bulent
    Aytac, Rusen
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03) : 472 - 477
  • [28] Reference values in ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation throughout the reproductive period
    La Marca, Antonio
    Grisendi, Valentina
    Spada, Elena
    Argento, Cindy
    Milani, Silvano
    Plebani, Maddalena
    Seracchioli, Renato
    Volpe, Annibale
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (01) : 66 - 69
  • [29] Biomarkers in the prediction of complications in pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology
    Nguyen-Hoang, Long
    Chaemsaithong, Piya
    Ip, Patricia N.
    Guo, Jun
    Wang, Xueqin
    Chong, Marc K. C.
    Sahota, Daljit S.
    Chung, Jacqueline P.
    Poon, Liona C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (03) : 1178 - 1190
  • [30] Effects of controlled ovarian stimulation on thyroid function during pregnancy†
    Li, Lingfei
    Li, Ling
    Li, Ping
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2022, 107 (06) : 1376 - 1385