Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology

被引:1
|
作者
Hugon-Rodin, Justine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Casini, Alessandro [4 ]
Benard, Julie [5 ]
Poncet, Antoine [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Raverot, Veronique [9 ,10 ]
Fontana, Pierre [4 ]
Vulliemoz, Nicolas [11 ]
Streuli, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Dept Femme Enfantet Adolescent DFEA Ob Gyn Reprod, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Hosp St Joseph, INSERM, U1153, Gynaecol Endocrinol Unit,EPOPE Grp,Gynecol Dept, Paris, France
[4] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Angiol & Haemostasis, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Child & Adolescent Med, Div Gynecol, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Geneva, Dept Hlth & Community Med, CRC & Div Clin Epidemiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[7] Univ Geneva, Div Clin Epidemiol, Dept Hlth & Community Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[8] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[9] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biochim & Biol Mol, Hormonol, Bron, France
[10] Univ Lyon, INSERM, UMRS 102, Neurosci Res Ctr,Waking Team, Bron, France
[11] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Mother Child, Fertil Med & Gynaecol Endocrinol, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
thrombin generation; hypercoagulability biomarkers; agonist trigger; controlled ovarian stimulation; and in vitro fertilization; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; THROMBIN GENERATION; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; THROMBOEMBOLISM; ESTRADIOL; ESTROGEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of 3 different ovarian stimulation protocols on surrogate biomarkers of coagulation. Design: Observational multicenter cohort study. Setting: The study was conducted in assisted reproductive technology (ART) units. Patients: Infertile women undergoing ART in 2017-2019 were included. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Our primary outcome was the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram. The ETP was measured at baseline (T1), on the day of ovulation triggering (T2), and 7 days after triggering (T3). Three protocols were prescribed according to the standards used and without hormonal before treatment: agonist protocol with human cho-rionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger (ag-hCG), antagonist protocol with hCG trigger (atg-hCG), or GnRH agonist trigger. The evolution of ETP was compared among groups using a mixed-effects linear regression model. Result(s): Sixty-four women with a mean age of 37.8 years participated in the study: of which 24, 16, 24 received ag-hCG, atg-hCG, and GnRH agonist triggers, respectively. As expected, the mean serum estradiol levels in GnRH agonist trigger were statistically higher at T2 and lower at T3 than that for both ag-hCG and atg-hCG. Overall, the ETP evolution over time was statistically different between the groups. Values were similar between groups at T1 and increased at T2 in each group. The greatest difference occurred between T2 and T3 in each group. The ETP continued to increase at T3 in ag-hCG (+110 nM/L x min) and atg-hCG (+171 nM/L x min), but it remained stable in GnRH agonist trigger (-2 nM/L x min). Sex hormone-binding globulin showed persistent increase at T3 despite the fall in estradiol levels, particularly in the GnRH agonist trigger group. Conclusion(s): The ag-hCG and atg-hCG groups were associated with a higher hypercoagulable state at T3 than the GnRH agonist trigger group. However, our results show the persistence of a hypercoagulable state after the GnRH agonist triggering despite a sharp drop in estradiol levels. These findings may support the use of GnRH agonist trigger protocol in patients with high thrombotic risk and gives new insight into the fact that coagulation parameters could be disturbed for long time periods. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04188444 (Fertil Steril (R) 2023;119:976-84. (c) 2023 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 984
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current Therapeutic Options for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Racca, Annalisa
    Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
    Raquel Neves, Ana
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    DRUGS, 2020, 80 (10) : 973 - 994
  • [2] Ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technology: an update
    Howles, Colin M.
    Ezcurra, Diego
    Homburg, Roy
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 7 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [3] Does a hyperechogenic endometrial mass in the uterus during controlled ovarian stimulation affect assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes?
    Deng, Ke
    Zhang, Mei
    Kong, Wei-Ya
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Ya-nan
    Yu, Qian
    Wu, Gui-hua
    Yan, Lei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 250 : 17 - 23
  • [4] A quality management approach to controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: the "Fischer protocol"
    Fischer, Robert
    Nakano, Fabiana Y.
    Roque, Matheus
    Bento, Fabiola C.
    Baukloh, Vera
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2019, 61 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [5] The use of anti-Mullerian hormone for controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology, fertility assessment and -counseling
    Pilsgaard, Fie
    Grynnerup, Anna G. -A.
    Lossl, Kristine
    Bungum, Leif
    Pinborg, Anja
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (09) : 1105 - 1113
  • [6] Individualised controlled ovarian stimulation (iCOS): maximising success rates for assisted reproductive technology patients
    Bosch, Ernesto
    Ezcurra, Diego
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2011, 9
  • [7] A reappraisal of ovarian stimulation strategies used in assisted reproductive technology
    Ip, Patricia N. P.
    Mak, Jennifer S. M.
    Law, Tracy S. M.
    Ng, Karen
    Chung, Jacqueline P. W.
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2023, 26 (04) : 824 - 844
  • [8] Assisted reproductive technology and ovarian cancer
    Devesa, M.
    Barri, P. N.
    Coroleu, B.
    MINERVA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 2010, 35 (04) : 247 - 257
  • [9] Impact of relative estradiol changes during ovarian stimulation on blastocyst formation and live birth in assisted reproductive technology
    Wenjie Huang
    Liuyan Wei
    Juan Tang
    Liuying Nong
    Ni Tang
    Qiuyue Wen
    Zuxing Qin
    Lixiang Xu
    Jingjing Li
    Li Fan
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [10] Past, Present, and Future of Gonadotropin Use in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation During Assisted Reproductive Techniques
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Anagnostou, Elli
    Mavrogianni, Depy
    Liokari, Emmanouela
    Dimitroulia, Evangelia
    Drakakis, Petros
    Loutradis, Dimitrios
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)