Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of four common fusion subtypes in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

被引:5
|
作者
Guo, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yiqi [3 ]
Pu, Xiaohong [4 ]
Guo, Hongqian [3 ]
Gan, Weidong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Urol, Drum Tower Clin Med Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Urol, Taizhou Peoples Hosp, Taizhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp,Med Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Pathol, Affiliated Hosp,Med Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
Xp11; 2 translocation renal cell carcinoma; TFE3; FISH; DBHS family; prognosis; GENE FUSION; TFE3; GENE; FEATURES; MORPHOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; IMPACT; NONO; PART;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1116648
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundXp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) is a group of rare and highly heterogeneous renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The translocation involving TFE3 and different fusion partners lead to overexpression of the chimeric protein. The purpose of this study is to explore the clinicopathological features of Xp11.2 tRCC with four common fusion subtypes. MethodsWe screened out 40 Xp11.2 tRCC patients from January 2007 to August 2021 in our institution. The diagnosis was initially confirmed by TFE3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay and their fusion partners were verified by RNA sequencing. Then the 40 cases were divided into two groups (DBHS family and non-DBHS family group) and a clinical comparison among the four common fusion subtypes was performed. ResultsAmong the 40 cases, 11 cases with SFPQ-TFE3 gene fusion and 7 cases with NONO-TFE3 gene fusion were classified in DBHS group, the remaining cases with ASPL-TFE3 (11 cases) or PRCC-TFE3 (11 cases) gene fusion were classified in non-DBHS group. Lymph node (LN) metastasis (P=0.027) and distant metastasis (P=0.009) were more common seen in non-DBHS family group than DBHS family group and cases in DBHS family group have better progressive-free survival (PFS) (P=0.02). In addition, ASPL-TFE3 fusion was associated with worse outcome (P=0.03) while NONO-TFE3 fusion (P=0.04) predicted a better prognosis. ConclusionsDifferent fusion partner genes may play a functional role in various morphology, molecular and biological features of Xp11.2 tRCCs. The impact of fusion partners on clinical characteristics of Xp11.2 tRCCs deserves further exploration.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estrogen associates with female predominance in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma
    Lu, Yanwen
    Zhu, Yiqi
    Ma, Wenliang
    Liu, Ning
    Dong, Xiang
    Shi, Qiancheng
    Yu, Fei
    Guo, Hongqian
    Li, Dongmei
    Gan, Weidong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [22] Adult Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma managed effectively with pazopanib
    Solano, Cristian
    Thapa, Shrinjaya
    Chisti, Mohammad Muhsin
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2021, 14 (06)
  • [23] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features of Adult Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma Differential Diagnosis With Three Main Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes
    Ma, Wenliang
    Zhang, Fan
    Huang, Haifeng
    Wang, Wei
    Zhu, Yiqi
    Lu, Yanwen
    Guo, Hongqian
    Gan, Weidong
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (11) : 2673 - 2685
  • [24] ALK rearrangement in TFE3-positive renal cell carcinoma: Alternative diagnostic option to exclude Xp11.2 translocation carcinoma
    Zhu, Yiqi
    Liu, Ning
    Guo, Wei
    Pu, Xiaohong
    Guo, Hongqian
    Gan, Weidong
    Li, Dongmei
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 216 (12)
  • [25] Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma With TFE3 Rearrangement: Distinct Morphological Features and Prognosis With Different Fusion Partners
    Ge, Yan
    Lin, Xingtao
    Zhang, Qingling
    Lin, Danyi
    Luo, Luqiao
    Wang, Huiling
    Li, Zhi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [26] Clinicopathological Findings on 28 Cases with XP11.2 Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Kuthi, Levente
    Somoracz, Aron
    Micsik, Tamas
    Jenei, Alex
    Hajdu, Adrienn
    Sejben, Istvan
    Imre, Daniel
    Posfai, Boglarka
    Koczian, Katalin
    Semjen, David
    Bajory, Zoltan
    Kulka, Janina
    Ivanyi, Bela
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (04) : 2123 - 2133
  • [27] Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma with a micropapillary pattern: cases report and literature review
    Xu, Zhou-Yi
    Wang, Jing-Ping
    Zhang, Yu
    Wu, Shi-Wu
    Ma, Li
    Qin, Yan-Zi
    Wang, Z. Peter
    Chai, Da-Min
    Tao, Yi-Sheng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (01): : 327 - 339
  • [28] Therapeutic strategies and predictive models for Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma in adults based on data of two Chinese medical centers
    Yang, Yunkai
    Zhao, Changfeng
    Wang, Zhida
    Liu, Feng
    Zhao, Ming
    Yang, Huiwen
    Chen, Jun
    Chen, Xuejing
    Shi, Min
    Jiang, Dixing
    Luo, Xiaoting
    Duan, Yue
    Bai, Yuchen
    AGING-US, 2024, 16 (02): : 1696 - 1711
  • [29] Computational analysis of pathological images enables a better diagnosis of TFE3 Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma
    Cheng, Jun
    Han, Zhi
    Mehra, Rohit
    Shao, Wei
    Cheng, Michael
    Feng, Qianjin
    Ni, Dong
    Huang, Kun
    Cheng, Liang
    Zhang, Jie
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [30] Unravelling the mysteries of Xp11.2 translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma: A case report with a review of the literature
    Suneel, Rachagiri
    Gupta, Parikshaa
    Sekar, Aravind
    Gupta, Nalini
    Saxena, Akshay
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2023, 34 (04) : 367 - 376