Left bundle branch area pacing prevents pacing induced cardiomyopathy in long-term observation

被引:11
作者
Bednarek, Agnieszka [1 ,2 ]
Kielbasa, Grzegorz [1 ]
Moskal, Pawel [1 ]
Ostrowska, Aleksandra [1 ]
Bednarski, Adam [1 ]
Sondej, Tomasz [1 ]
Kusiak, Aleksander [1 ]
Rajzer, Marek [1 ]
Jastrzebski, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Dept Cardiol Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[2] Szpital Uniwersytecki, Kardiol & Elektrokardiol Interwencyjnej & Nadcisni, Ul Jakubowskiego 2, PL-30688 Krakow, Poland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2023年 / 46卷 / 07期
关键词
echocardiography; left bundle branch area pacing; left ventricular systolic function; pacing induced cardiomyopathy; 2D speckle tracing; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; PREDICTORS; ASSOCIATION; SOCIETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is one of the methods to deliver conduction system pacing which potentially avoids the negative impact of conventional right ventricular pacing. Objective: To assess echocardiographic outcomes in a long-term observation in patients with LBBAP implemented for bradyarrhythmia indications. Methods and Results: A total of 151 patients with symptomatic bradycardia and LBBAP pacemaker implanted, were prospectively included in the study. Subjects with left bundle branch block and CRT indications (n = 29), ventricular pacing burden <40% (n = 11), and loss of LBBAP (n = 10) were excluded from further analysis. At baseline and the last follow-up visit, echocardiography with global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessment, 12-lead ECG, pacemaker interrogation, and blood level of NT-proBNP were performed. The median follow-up period was 23 months (15.5-28). None of the analyzed patients fulfilled the criteria for pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and GLS was observed in patients with LVEF <50% at baseline (n = 39): 41.4 +/- 9.2% versus 45.6 +/- 9.9%, and 12.9 +/- 3.6% versus 15.5 +/- 3.7%, respectively. In the subgroup with preserved EF (n = 62), LVEF and GLS remained stable at follow-up: 59.3 +/- 5.5% versus 60 +/- 5.5%, and 19 +/- 3.9% versus 19.4 +/- 3.8%, respectively. Conclusion: LBBAP prevents PICM in patients with preserved LVEF and improves left ventricle function in subjects with depressed LVEF. LBBAP might be the preferred pacing modality for bradyarrhythmia indications.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 638
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing in older patients
    Wang, Qian
    He, Chen
    Fan, Xiaohan
    Zhu, Haojie
    Li, Xiaofei
    Liu, Zhimin
    Yao, Yan
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, : 1346 - 1357
  • [42] Paced QRS morphology mimicking complete left bundle branch block induced by right ventricular pacing is associated with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
    Ikeda, Shota
    Sakamoto, Kazuo
    Sugawara, Masafumi
    Yakabe, Daisuke
    Nagaoka, Kazuhiro
    Kowase, Shinya
    Inoue, Shujiro
    Morishige, Kunio
    Mukai, Yasushi
    Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
    Kinugawa, Shintaro
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (05) : 906 - 915
  • [43] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Morbidity and Mortality
    Liang, Yixiu
    Xiao, Zilong
    Liu, Xi
    Wang, Jingfeng
    Yu, Ziqing
    Gong, Xue
    Lu, Hongyang
    Yang, Shengwen
    Gu, Min
    Zhang, Lei
    Li, Minghui
    Pan, Lei
    Li, Xiao
    Chen, Xueying
    Su, Yangang
    Hua, Wei
    Ge, Junbo
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2024, 38 (03) : 471 - 481
  • [44] Sex Differences in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Miranda-Arboleda, Andres F.
    Sauer, William H.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Marin, Jorge E.
    Aristizabal, Julian M.
    Nino, Cesar D.
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Martinez, Juan M.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Lopez-Cabanillas, Nestor
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (07) : 1736 - 1749
  • [45] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Morbidity and Mortality
    Yixiu Liang
    Zilong Xiao
    Xi Liu
    Jingfeng Wang
    Ziqing Yu
    Xue Gong
    Hongyang Lu
    Shengwen Yang
    Min Gu
    Lei Zhang
    Minghui Li
    Lei Pan
    Xiao Li
    Xueying Chen
    Yangang Su
    Wei Hua
    Junbo Ge
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2024, 38 : 471 - 481
  • [46] The Implantation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with and without Bundle Branch Block
    Chen, Tian-Ping
    Shi, Xiao-Jun
    Lu, Dong-Yu
    Zhang, Heng
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2021, 31 (11): : 1268 - 1272
  • [47] Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Perfect Compromise?
    Raymond-Paquin, Alexandre
    Padala, Santosh K.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 10 (04) : 241 - 243
  • [48] Left bundle branch area pacing in congenital heart disease
    O'Connor, Matthew
    Riad, Omar
    Shi, Rui
    Hunnybun, Dan
    Li, Wei
    Jarman, Julian W. E.
    Foran, John
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Markides, Vias
    Gatzoulis, Michael A.
    Wong, Tom
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (02): : 561 - 570
  • [49] Left bundle branch area pacing versus right ventricular pacing in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation requiring ventricular pacing
    Wang, Zhao
    Zhu, Haojie
    Li, Xiaofei
    Yao, Yan
    Liu, Zhimin
    Fan, Xiaohan
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (12): : 2024 - 2030
  • [50] Closed loop stimulation in left bundle branch area pacing
    Dell'Era, Gabriele
    Ghiglieno, Chiara
    De Vecchi, Federica
    Santagostino, Matteo
    Annunziata, Lucia
    Baldassarre, Irene
    Giacopelli, Daniele
    Patti, Giuseppe
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (09): : 1276 - 1279