Left bundle branch area pacing prevents pacing induced cardiomyopathy in long-term observation

被引:11
作者
Bednarek, Agnieszka [1 ,2 ]
Kielbasa, Grzegorz [1 ]
Moskal, Pawel [1 ]
Ostrowska, Aleksandra [1 ]
Bednarski, Adam [1 ]
Sondej, Tomasz [1 ]
Kusiak, Aleksander [1 ]
Rajzer, Marek [1 ]
Jastrzebski, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Dept Cardiol Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[2] Szpital Uniwersytecki, Kardiol & Elektrokardiol Interwencyjnej & Nadcisni, Ul Jakubowskiego 2, PL-30688 Krakow, Poland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2023年 / 46卷 / 07期
关键词
echocardiography; left bundle branch area pacing; left ventricular systolic function; pacing induced cardiomyopathy; 2D speckle tracing; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; PREDICTORS; ASSOCIATION; SOCIETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is one of the methods to deliver conduction system pacing which potentially avoids the negative impact of conventional right ventricular pacing. Objective: To assess echocardiographic outcomes in a long-term observation in patients with LBBAP implemented for bradyarrhythmia indications. Methods and Results: A total of 151 patients with symptomatic bradycardia and LBBAP pacemaker implanted, were prospectively included in the study. Subjects with left bundle branch block and CRT indications (n = 29), ventricular pacing burden <40% (n = 11), and loss of LBBAP (n = 10) were excluded from further analysis. At baseline and the last follow-up visit, echocardiography with global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessment, 12-lead ECG, pacemaker interrogation, and blood level of NT-proBNP were performed. The median follow-up period was 23 months (15.5-28). None of the analyzed patients fulfilled the criteria for pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and GLS was observed in patients with LVEF <50% at baseline (n = 39): 41.4 +/- 9.2% versus 45.6 +/- 9.9%, and 12.9 +/- 3.6% versus 15.5 +/- 3.7%, respectively. In the subgroup with preserved EF (n = 62), LVEF and GLS remained stable at follow-up: 59.3 +/- 5.5% versus 60 +/- 5.5%, and 19 +/- 3.9% versus 19.4 +/- 3.8%, respectively. Conclusion: LBBAP prevents PICM in patients with preserved LVEF and improves left ventricle function in subjects with depressed LVEF. LBBAP might be the preferred pacing modality for bradyarrhythmia indications.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 638
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparisons of electrophysiological characteristics, pacing parameters and mid- to long-term effects in right ventricular septal pacing, right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch area pacing
    Wenhua Li
    Yu Ding
    Chao Gong
    Genqing Zhou
    Xiaofeng Lu
    Yong Wei
    Shi Peng
    Lidong Cai
    Tianyou Yuan
    Fangfang Li
    Shaowen Liu
    Songwen Chen
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 22
  • [32] His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure
    Paluszkiewicz, Patrycja
    Martuszewski, Adrian
    Radziejewska, Jadwiga
    Zawadzki, Jacek
    Smereka, Jacek
    Gajek, Jacek
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [33] Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block
    Huang, Weijian
    Su, Lan
    Wu, Shengjie
    Xu, Lei
    Xiao, Fangyi
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Mao, Guangyun
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    HEART, 2019, 105 (02) : 137 - 143
  • [34] An Electrocardiographic Characterization of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Induced Right Ventricular Activation Delay: A Comparison With Native Right Bundle Branch Block
    Ozpak, Emine
    Demolder, Anthony
    Kizilkilic, Sevda
    Calle, Simon
    Timmermans, Frank
    De Pooter, Jan
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [35] Right ventriculography to guide left bundle branch pacing in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: a novel case report
    Dulay, Mansimran Singh
    Ahmed, Raheel
    Child, Nick
    Arnold, Ahran
    Tanner, Mark
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2024, 8 (10)
  • [36] Predictors of functional mitral regurgitation improvement in patients with left bundle branch block treated with left bundle branch area pacing
    Miao, Huazhong
    Chen, Zenghong
    Luo, Yushi
    Cheng, Yandi
    Cooray, P. L. R. Krisunika
    Wu, Tian
    Yang, Wen
    Zhou, Xiujuan
    Shan, Qijun
    Jiang, Zhixin
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, : 1412 - 1417
  • [37] Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Cabanillas, Nestor Lopez
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [38] Worldwide survey on implantation of and outcomes for conduction system pacing with His bundle and left bundle branch area pacing leads
    Perino, Alexander C.
    Wang, Paul J.
    Lloyd, Michael
    Zanon, Francesco
    Fujiu, Katsuhito
    Osman, Faizel
    Briongos-Figuero, Sem
    Sato, Toshiaki
    Aksu, Tolga
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Sideris, Skevos
    Rao, Praveen
    Boczar, Krzysztof
    Xu Yuan-ning
    Wu, Michael
    Namboodiri, Narayanan
    Garcia, Rodrigue
    Kataria, Vikas
    De Pooter, Jan
    Przibille, Oliver
    Gehi, Anil K.
    Cano, Oscar
    Katsouras, Grigorios
    Cai, Binni
    Astheimer, Klaus
    Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan
    Datino, Tomas
    Rizkallah, Jacques
    Alasti, Mohammad
    Feld, Gregory
    Barrio-Lopez, Maria Teresa
    Gilmore, Mark
    Conti, Sergio
    Yanagisawa, Satoshi
    Indik, Julia H.
    Zou, Jiangang
    Saha, Sandeep A.
    Rodriguez-Munoz, Daniel
    Chang, Kuan-Cheng
    Lebedev, Dmitry S.
    Leal, Miguel A.
    Haeberlin, Andreas
    Dal Forno, Alexander R. J.
    Orlov, Michael
    Frutos, Manuel
    Cabanas-Grandio, Pilar
    Lyne, Jonathan
    Leyva, Francisco
    Maria Tolosana, Jose
    Ollitrault, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (07) : 1589 - 1600
  • [39] Feasibility of His bundle pacing and atrioventricular junction ablation with left bundle branch area pacing as backup
    Mahajan, Ankit
    Trivedi, Rohan
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (07) : 1180 - 1181
  • [40] Extraction of stylet-driven pacing lead for left bundle branch area pacing
    Bonfanti, Paolo
    Mantovani, Antonio
    Refugjati, Taulant
    Sormani, Luca
    Corrado, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2024, 40 (01) : 174 - 176