Left bundle branch area pacing prevents pacing induced cardiomyopathy in long-term observation

被引:17
作者
Bednarek, Agnieszka [1 ,2 ]
Kielbasa, Grzegorz [1 ]
Moskal, Pawel [1 ]
Ostrowska, Aleksandra [1 ]
Bednarski, Adam [1 ]
Sondej, Tomasz [1 ]
Kusiak, Aleksander [1 ]
Rajzer, Marek [1 ]
Jastrzebski, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Dept Cardiol Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[2] Szpital Uniwersytecki, Kardiol & Elektrokardiol Interwencyjnej & Nadcisni, Ul Jakubowskiego 2, PL-30688 Krakow, Poland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2023年 / 46卷 / 07期
关键词
echocardiography; left bundle branch area pacing; left ventricular systolic function; pacing induced cardiomyopathy; 2D speckle tracing; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; PREDICTORS; ASSOCIATION; SOCIETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is one of the methods to deliver conduction system pacing which potentially avoids the negative impact of conventional right ventricular pacing. Objective: To assess echocardiographic outcomes in a long-term observation in patients with LBBAP implemented for bradyarrhythmia indications. Methods and Results: A total of 151 patients with symptomatic bradycardia and LBBAP pacemaker implanted, were prospectively included in the study. Subjects with left bundle branch block and CRT indications (n = 29), ventricular pacing burden <40% (n = 11), and loss of LBBAP (n = 10) were excluded from further analysis. At baseline and the last follow-up visit, echocardiography with global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessment, 12-lead ECG, pacemaker interrogation, and blood level of NT-proBNP were performed. The median follow-up period was 23 months (15.5-28). None of the analyzed patients fulfilled the criteria for pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and GLS was observed in patients with LVEF <50% at baseline (n = 39): 41.4 +/- 9.2% versus 45.6 +/- 9.9%, and 12.9 +/- 3.6% versus 15.5 +/- 3.7%, respectively. In the subgroup with preserved EF (n = 62), LVEF and GLS remained stable at follow-up: 59.3 +/- 5.5% versus 60 +/- 5.5%, and 19 +/- 3.9% versus 19.4 +/- 3.8%, respectively. Conclusion: LBBAP prevents PICM in patients with preserved LVEF and improves left ventricle function in subjects with depressed LVEF. LBBAP might be the preferred pacing modality for bradyarrhythmia indications.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 638
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Evaluation of cardiac synchrony in left bundle branch pacing: Insights from echocardiographic research [J].
Cai, Binni ;
Huang, Xinyi ;
Li, Linlin ;
Guo, Jincun ;
Chen, Simei ;
Meng, Fanqi ;
Wang, Huimin ;
Lin, Biqin ;
Su, Maolong .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) :560-569
[2]   Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology [J].
Chen, Xing ;
Qian, Zhiyong ;
Zou, Fengwei ;
Wang, Yao ;
Zhang, Xinwei ;
Qiu, Yuanhao ;
Hou, Xiaofeng ;
Zhou, Xiaohong ;
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi ;
Zou, Jiangang .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03) :448-457
[3]   Left bundle branch pacing compared to left ventricular septal myocardial pacing increases interventricular dyssynchrony but accelerates left ventricular lateral wall depolarization [J].
Curila, Karol ;
Jurak, Pavel ;
Jastrzebski, Marek ;
Prinzen, Frits ;
Waldauf, Petr ;
Halamek, Josef ;
Vernooy, Kevin ;
Smisek, Radovan ;
Karch, Jakub ;
Plesinger, Filip ;
Moskal, Pawel ;
Susankova, Marketa ;
Znojilova, Lucie ;
Heckman, Luuk ;
Viscor, Ivo ;
Vondra, Vlastimil ;
Leinveber, Pavel ;
Osmancik, Pavel .
HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (08) :1281-1289
[4]  
Glikson M, 2021, EUR HEART J, V42, P3427, DOI [10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364, 10.1093/europace/euab232]
[5]   Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients by using left bundle branch pacing [J].
Gu, Ying ;
Li, Yanming ;
Zhu, Ying ;
Lin, Xiuyu ;
Tian, Tian ;
Zhang, Qigao ;
Gong, Jianbin ;
Wang, Lei ;
Li, Jianhua .
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
[6]   Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients [J].
Heckman, Luuk I. B. ;
Luermans, Justin G. L. M. ;
Curila, Karol ;
Van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W. ;
Westra, Sjoerd ;
Smisek, Radovan ;
Prinzen, Frits W. ;
Vernooy, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (04) :1-13
[7]   Long-term follow-up results of patients with left bundle branch pacing and exploration for potential factors affecting cardiac function [J].
Hu, Qingyun ;
Lu, Wenzhao ;
Chen, Keping ;
Dai, Yan ;
Lin, Jinxuan ;
Xu, Nan ;
Lin, Jingru ;
Chen, Ruohan ;
Li, Yao ;
Cheng, Chendi ;
Zhou, Yu'an ;
Zhang, Shu .
FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
[8]   Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block [J].
Hua, Juan ;
Chen, Yang ;
Yu, Jianhua ;
Xiong, Qinmei ;
Xia, Zhen ;
Xia, Zirong ;
Huang, Qianghui ;
Kong, Qiling ;
Chen, Huolong ;
Zhang, Yichu ;
Hu, Jianxin ;
Li, Juxiang ;
Hu, Jinzhu ;
Chen, Qi ;
Hong, Kui .
HEART AND VESSELS, 2022, 37 (07) :1162-1174
[9]   Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing [J].
Huang, Weijian ;
Wu, Shengjie ;
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi ;
Su, Lan ;
Chen, Xueying ;
Cai, Bingni ;
Zou, Jiangang ;
Lan, Rongfang ;
Fu, Guosheng ;
Mao, Guangyun ;
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ;
Whinnett, Zachary, I ;
Tung, Roderick .
JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (07) :849-858
[10]   A Novel Pacing Strategy With Low and Stable Output: Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Immediately Beyond the Conduction Block [J].
Huang, Weijian ;
Su, Lan ;
Wu, Shengjie ;
Xu, Lei ;
Xiao, Fangyi ;
Zhou, Xiaohong ;
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 33 (12) :1736.e1-1736.e3