Bioglass-polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: a review of current trends

被引:10
作者
Motameni, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Cardakli, Ismail Seckin [3 ]
Gurbuz, Riza [1 ]
Alshemary, Ammar Z. Z. [4 ,5 ]
Razavi, Mehdi [6 ,7 ]
Farukoglu, Omer Can [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Cankaya Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Ataturk Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Erzurum, Turkiye
[4] Wenzhou Kean Univ, Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Chem, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Al Mustaqbal Univ Coll, Biomed Engn Dept, Hillah, Iraq
[6] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Biionix Bion Mat Implants & Interfaces Cluster, Orlando, FL USA
[7] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Orlando, FL USA
[8] Gazi Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Bone tissue; scaffolds; bioglass; synthetic polymers; natural polymers; BIOACTIVE GLASS SCAFFOLDS; IN-VITRO; SILK FIBROIN; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; POLYURETHANE-UREA; FILLER CONTENT; DRUG-DELIVERY; POLY(EPSILON-CAPROLACTONE) SCAFFOLDS; BIODEGRADABLE POLYURETHANES; ENGINEERING SCAFFOLDS;
D O I
10.1080/00914037.2023.2186864
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Biocompatible and bioactive composite scaffolds are essential in bone tissue regeneration because of their bioactivity and multilevel porous assemblies. There is a high demand for three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to treat bone regeneration defects, trauma, and congenital skeletal abnormalities in the current scenario. The main objective of this review is to collect all the possible information concerning synthetic and natural polymer-Bioglass (BG)-based scaffold materials and systematically present them to summarize the importance and need for these materials. The importance of the bone tissue engineering field has been highlighted. Given the current challenges, a comprehensive description of materials fabrication and patterns in scaffold structures is required. This review also includes the most crucial aspect of this study: why are polymeric materials mixed with BG materials? Individually, both BG and polymeric materials lack specific essential characteristics to enhance the scope of these materials. However, preparing the composites of both ensures the researchers that composites of polymers and BG have improved properties that make them versatile materials for bone tissue engineering applications. This study deals with the individual drawbacks of the inorganic BGs, synthetic polymers, and the deficiencies of natural polymers. This study has also included a brief description of various scaffold fabricating techniques. Finally, this study revealed that by manufacturing and developing novel composite materials-scaffolds bearing the capability to repair, heal, and regenerate accidentally damaged or badly injured bones, many occasional problems can be solved in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, this review demonstrated that natural polymeric materials present many advantages over synthetic bone grafts. Yet, synthetic biomaterials have one additional attractive feature, as they have the flexibility to be designed according to the desired demands. These features make them the best choice for a wide range of bone tissue engineering projects for orthopedic surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 619
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ursolic acid loaded-mesoporous bioglass/chitosan porous scaffolds as drug delivery system for bone regeneration
    Ge, Yu-Wei
    Lu, Jia-Wei
    Sun, Zhen-Yu
    Liu, Zhi-Qing
    Zhou, Jun
    Ke, Qin-Fei
    Mao, Yuan-Qing
    Guo, Ya-Ping
    Zhu, Zhen-An
    [J]. NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 18 : 336 - 346
  • [32] Fabrication of Bioactive Composite Scaffolds by Electrospinning for Bone Regeneration
    Nandakumar, Anandkumar
    Fernandes, Hugo
    de Boer, Jan
    Moroni, Lorenzo
    Habibovic, Pamela
    van Blitterswijk, Clemens A.
    [J]. MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE, 2010, 10 (11) : 1365 - 1373
  • [33] Comparative study of PCL-HAp and PCL-bioglass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Rodenas-Rochina, Joaquin
    Gomez Ribelles, Jose Luis
    Lebourg, Myriam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 24 (05) : 1293 - 1308
  • [34] 3D-printed PCL/bioglass (BGS-7) composite scaffolds with high toughness and cell-responses for bone tissue regeneration
    Kim, YongBok
    Lim, Jun Young
    Yang, Gi Hoon
    Seo, Jun-Hyuk
    Ryu, Hyun-Seung
    Kim, GeunHyung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2019, 79 : 163 - 171
  • [35] Biomineralized polymer matrix composites for bone tissue repair: a review
    Zhong, Lin
    Qu, Ying
    Shi, Kun
    Chu, Bingyang
    Lei, Minyi
    Huang, Kangkang
    Gu, Yingchun
    Qian, Zhiyong
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY, 2018, 61 (12) : 1553 - 1567
  • [36] Scaffolds Fabricated from Natural Polymers/Composites by Electrospinning for Bone Tissue Regeneration
    Sofi, Hasham S.
    Ashraf, Roqia
    Beigh, Mushtaq A.
    Sheikh, Faheem A.
    [J]. CUTTING-EDGE ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 1078 : 49 - 78
  • [37] Recent advances in graphene-based polymer composite scaffolds for bone/ cartilage tissue engineering
    Amiryaghoubi, Nazanin
    Fathi, Marziyeh
    Barar, Jaleh
    Omidian, Hossein
    Omidi, Yadollah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 72
  • [38] Composite cement embedded in a biopolymer matrix for bone tissue regeneration
    Monia, Trimeche
    Ridha, Ben Cheikh
    Hassib, Keskes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2023, 36 (12) : 4858 - 4873
  • [39] Nanodiamond reinforced polyvinylidene fluoride/bioglass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Shuai, Cijun
    Huang, Wei
    Feng, Pei
    Gao, Chengde
    Gao, Dan
    Deng, Youwen
    Wang, Qiyuan
    Wu, Ping
    Guo, Xiaoning
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS, 2017, 24 (01) : 249 - 255
  • [40] Osteoblast mineralization with composite nanofibrous substrate for bone tissue regeneration
    Venugopal, Jayarama Reddy
    Dev, Venkateshwarapuram Rengaswami Giri
    Senthilram, Thinakaran
    Sathiskumar, Dhayalan
    Gupta, Deepika
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    [J]. CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 35 (01) : 73 - 80