Bioglass-polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: a review of current trends

被引:10
作者
Motameni, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Cardakli, Ismail Seckin [3 ]
Gurbuz, Riza [1 ]
Alshemary, Ammar Z. Z. [4 ,5 ]
Razavi, Mehdi [6 ,7 ]
Farukoglu, Omer Can [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Cankaya Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Ataturk Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Erzurum, Turkiye
[4] Wenzhou Kean Univ, Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Chem, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Al Mustaqbal Univ Coll, Biomed Engn Dept, Hillah, Iraq
[6] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Biionix Bion Mat Implants & Interfaces Cluster, Orlando, FL USA
[7] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Orlando, FL USA
[8] Gazi Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Bone tissue; scaffolds; bioglass; synthetic polymers; natural polymers; BIOACTIVE GLASS SCAFFOLDS; IN-VITRO; SILK FIBROIN; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; POLYURETHANE-UREA; FILLER CONTENT; DRUG-DELIVERY; POLY(EPSILON-CAPROLACTONE) SCAFFOLDS; BIODEGRADABLE POLYURETHANES; ENGINEERING SCAFFOLDS;
D O I
10.1080/00914037.2023.2186864
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Biocompatible and bioactive composite scaffolds are essential in bone tissue regeneration because of their bioactivity and multilevel porous assemblies. There is a high demand for three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to treat bone regeneration defects, trauma, and congenital skeletal abnormalities in the current scenario. The main objective of this review is to collect all the possible information concerning synthetic and natural polymer-Bioglass (BG)-based scaffold materials and systematically present them to summarize the importance and need for these materials. The importance of the bone tissue engineering field has been highlighted. Given the current challenges, a comprehensive description of materials fabrication and patterns in scaffold structures is required. This review also includes the most crucial aspect of this study: why are polymeric materials mixed with BG materials? Individually, both BG and polymeric materials lack specific essential characteristics to enhance the scope of these materials. However, preparing the composites of both ensures the researchers that composites of polymers and BG have improved properties that make them versatile materials for bone tissue engineering applications. This study deals with the individual drawbacks of the inorganic BGs, synthetic polymers, and the deficiencies of natural polymers. This study has also included a brief description of various scaffold fabricating techniques. Finally, this study revealed that by manufacturing and developing novel composite materials-scaffolds bearing the capability to repair, heal, and regenerate accidentally damaged or badly injured bones, many occasional problems can be solved in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, this review demonstrated that natural polymeric materials present many advantages over synthetic bone grafts. Yet, synthetic biomaterials have one additional attractive feature, as they have the flexibility to be designed according to the desired demands. These features make them the best choice for a wide range of bone tissue engineering projects for orthopedic surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 619
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Novel 3D Bioglass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration
    Daskalakis, Evangelos
    Huang, Boyang
    Vyas, Cian
    Acar, Anil Ahmet
    Fallah, Ali
    Cooper, Glen
    Weightman, Andrew
    Koc, Bahattin
    Blunn, Gordon
    Bartolo, Paulo
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [2] Current advances in bone tissue engineering concerning ceramic and bioglass scaffolds: A review
    Ribas, Renata Guimardes
    Schatkoski, Vanessa Modelski
    do Amaral Montanheiro, Thais Larissa
    Canuto de Menezes, Beatriz Rossi
    Stegemann, Cristiane
    Gonsalves Leite, Douglas Marcel
    Thim, Gilmar Patrocinio
    CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 45 (17) : 21051 - 21061
  • [3] Nano-hydroxyapatite/natural polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a brief review of recent trend
    Radha, G.
    Manjubaashini, N.
    Balakumar, S.
    IN VITRO MODELS, 2023, 2 (05): : 125 - 151
  • [4] Functional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Materials, Methods, and Future Directions
    Todd, Emily Ann
    Mirsky, Nicholas A.
    Silva, Bruno Luis Graciliano
    Shinde, Ankita Raja
    Arakelians, Aris R. L.
    Nayak, Vasudev Vivekanand
    Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chierici
    Gupta, Nikhil
    Witek, Lukasz
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2024, 15 (10)
  • [5] COMMON SCAFFOLDS IN TISSUE ENGINEERING FOR BONE TISSUE REGENERATION: A REVIEW ARTICLE
    Hozan, Calin Tudor
    Cote, Adrian
    Bulzan, Madalin
    Szilagyi, Gheorghe
    PHARMACOPHORE, 2023, 14 (06): : 46 - 51
  • [6] Biodegradable and bioactive polymer/Bioglass® composite foams for tissue engineering scaffolds
    Boccaccini, AR
    Blaker, JJ
    Maquet, V
    Jerome, R
    Blacher, S
    Roether, JA
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN ADVANCED MATERIALS AND PROCESSES, 2005, 494 : 499 - 506
  • [7] Biodegradable polyurethane composite scaffolds containing Bioglass® for bone tissue engineering
    Ryszkowska, Joanna L.
    Auguscik, Monika
    Sheikh, Ann
    Boccaccini, Aldo R.
    COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 70 (13) : 1894 - 1908
  • [8] Physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of PZL/PLGA/bioglass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Cui, Ning
    Qian, Junmin
    Wang, Jinlei
    Wang, Yaping
    Xu, Weijun
    Wang, Hongjie
    RSC ADVANCES, 2016, 6 (99): : 97096 - 97106
  • [9] Composite silk fibroin hydrogel scaffolds for cartilage tissue regeneration
    Montaseri, Zohre
    Abolmaali, Samira Sadat
    Tamaddon, Ali Mohammad
    Farvadi, Fakhrossadat
    JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 79
  • [10] Application of scaffolds for bone regeneration strategies: Current trends and future directions
    Billstrom, Gry Hulsart
    Blom, Ashley W.
    Larsson, Sune
    Beswick, Andrew D.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2013, 44 : S28 - S33