Predicting the Feasibility of Curative Resection in Low Rectal Cancer: Insights from a Prospective Observational Study on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accuracy

被引:1
|
作者
Volovat, Cristian-Constantin [1 ]
Scripcariu, Dragos-Viorel [2 ]
Boboc, Diana [3 ]
Volovat, Simona-Ruxandra [3 ]
Vasilache, Ingrid-Andrada [4 ]
Lupascu-Ursulescu, Corina [1 ]
Gheorghe, Liliana [1 ]
Baean, Luiza-Maria [1 ]
Volovat, Constantin [3 ]
Scripcariu, Viorel [2 ]
机构
[1] Grigore T Popa Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Radiol, Iasi 700115, Romania
[2] Grigore T Popa Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Surg, Iasi 700115, Romania
[3] Grigore T Popa Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Med Oncol Radiotherapy, Iasi 700115, Romania
[4] Grigore T Popa Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Mother & Child Care, Iasi 700115, Romania
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2024年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
rectal adenocarcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; predictive performance; combined models; EXTRAMURAL VASCULAR INVASION; MARGIN; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/medicina60020330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: A positive pathological circumferential resection margin is a key prognostic factor in rectal cancer surgery. The point of this prospective study was to see how well different MRI parameters could predict a positive pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM) in people who had been diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma, either on their own or when used together. Materials and Methods: Between November 2019 and February 2023, a total of 112 patients were enrolled in this prospective study and followed up for a 36-month period. MRI predictors such as circumferential resection margin (mCRM), presence of extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI), tumor location, and the distance between the tumor and anal verge, taken individually or combined, were evaluated with univariate and sensitivity analyses. Survival estimates in relation to a pCRM status were also determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: When individually evaluated, the best MRI predictor for the detection of a pCRM in the postsurgical histopathological examination is mrEMVI, which achieved a sensitivity (Se) of 77.78%, a specificity (Sp) of 87.38%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.83%, and an accuracy of 86.61%. Also, the best predictive performance was achieved by a model that comprised all MRI predictors (mCRM+ mrEMVI+ anterior location+ < 4 cm from the anal verge), with an Se of 66.67%, an Sp of 88.46%, an NPV of 96.84%, and an accuracy of 86.73%. The survival rates were significantly higher in the pCRM-negative group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of selective individual imaging predictors or combined models could be useful for the prediction of positive pCRM and risk stratification for local recurrence or distant metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A preliminary study of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: imaging quality and preoperative assessment
    Zhao, Li
    Liang, Meng
    Wu, Pu-yeh
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Hongmei
    Zhao, Xinming
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [12] Factors affecting the restaging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer
    Kim, I. Y.
    Cha, S. W.
    Ahn, J. H.
    Kim, Y. W.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (04): : 493 - 498
  • [13] Preoperative CT versus diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver in patients with rectal cancer; a prospective randomized trial
    Achiam, Michael P.
    Logager, Vibeke B.
    Skjoldbye, Bjorn
    Moller, Jakob M.
    Lorenzen, Torben
    Rasmussen, Vera L.
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    Mollerup, Talie H.
    Okholm, Cecilie
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [14] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    G Brown
    S Davies
    G T Williams
    M W Bourne
    R G Newcombe
    A G Radcliffe
    J Blethyn
    N S Dallimore
    B I Rees
    C J Phillips
    T S Maughan
    British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 23 - 29
  • [15] Preoperative evaluation of the depth of anal canal invasion in very low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and surgical indications for intersphincteric resection
    Yoshiko Bamba
    Michio Itabashi
    Shingo Kameoka
    Surgery Today, 2012, 42 : 328 - 333
  • [16] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    Brown, G
    Davies, S
    Williams, GT
    Bourne, MW
    Newcombe, RG
    Radcliffe, AG
    Blethyn, J
    Dallimore, NS
    Rees, BI
    Phillips, CJ
    Maughan, TS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [17] Rectal cancer at the peritoneal reflection. Preoperative MRI accuracy and histophatologic correlation. Prospective study
    Sarrado, Eduardo Alvarez
    Segura, Francisco Giner
    Domenech, Adela Batista
    Garcia-Fuster, lvaro Garcia-Granero
    Frasson, Matteo
    Rudenko, Polina
    Lorente, Blas Flor
    Ximenez, Eduardo Garcia-Granero
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2022, 100 (08): : 488 - 495
  • [18] Feasibility of Selective Lateral Node Dissection Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Lee, Sang Jae
    Hur, Bo Yun
    Kim, Min Ju
    Park, Sung Chan
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 232 : 227 - 233
  • [19] Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic impact of restaging by magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Soon Jin
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 113 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [20] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor
    Peschaud, F
    Cuenod, CA
    Benoist, S
    Julié, C
    Beauchet, A
    Siauve, N
    Taieb-Kashi, F
    Penna, C
    Nordlinger, B
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (08) : 1603 - 1609