Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement

被引:0
|
作者
Phillips, William R. [1 ,8 ]
Sturgiss, Elizabeth [2 ]
Glasziou, Paul [3 ]
Hartman, Tim C. olde [4 ]
Orkin, Aaron M. [5 ]
Prathivadi, Pallavi [6 ]
Reeve, Joanne [7 ]
Russell, Grant M. [6 ]
van Weel, Chris [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Robina, Qld, Australia
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Box 356390, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
GUIDELINES; WASTE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Primary care (PC) is a unique clinical specialty and research discipline with its own perspec-tives and methods. Research in this field uses varied research methods and study designs to investigate myriad topics. The diversity of PC presents challenges for reporting, and despite the proliferation of reporting guidelines, none focuses specifically on the needs of PC. The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Checklist guides reporting of PC research to include the information needed by the diverse PC community, including practitioners, patients, and communities. CRISP complements current guidelines to enhance the reporting, dissemination, and application of PC research findings and results. Prior CRISP studies documented opportunities to improve research reporting in this field. Our surveys of the international, interdisciplinary, and interprofessional PC community identi-fied essential items to include in PC research reports. A 2-round Delphi study identified a consensus list of items considered necessary. The CRISP Checklist contains 24 items that describe the research team, patients, study participants, health conditions, clinical encoun-ters, care teams, interventions, study measures, settings of care, and implementation of findings/results in PC. Not every item applies to every study design or topic. The CRISP guidelines inform the design and reporting of (1) studies done by PC researchers, (2) studies done by other investigators in PC populations and settings, and (3) studies intended for appli-cation in PC practice. Improved reporting of the context of the clinical services and the pro-cess of research is critical to interpreting study findings/results and applying them to diverse populations and varied settings in PC.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pilot test of Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary care (CRISP)
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth
    Phillips, William R.
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 25
  • [2] Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: An International Survey of Researchers
    Phillips, William R.
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth
    Hunik, Liesbeth
    Glasziou, Paul
    Hartman, Tim Olde
    Orkin, Aaron
    Reeve, Joanne
    Russell, Grant M.
    van Weel, Chris
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (01) : 12 - +
  • [3] Mapping the literature on primary care research reporting: a scoping review
    Phillips, William R.
    Louden, Diana Nelson
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 38 (04) : 495 - 508
  • [4] Improving the reporting and usability of research studies
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Galipeau, James
    Turner, Lucy
    Moher, David
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2013, 60 (04): : 337 - 344
  • [5] Developing a checklist for reporting research using simulated patient methodology(CRISP): a consensus study
    Amaratunge, Suvini
    Harrison, Morgan
    Clifford, Rhonda
    Seubert, Liza
    Page, Amy
    Bond, Christine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 29 (03) : 218 - 227
  • [6] Key items for reports of primary care research: an international Delphi study
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth Ann
    Prathivadi, Pallavi
    Phillips, William R.
    Moriarty, Frank
    Lucassen, Peter L. B. J.
    van der Wouden, Johannes C.
    Glasziou, Paul
    Olde Hartman, Tim C.
    Orkin, Aaron
    Reeve, Joanne
    Russell, Grant
    van Weel, Chris
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [7] State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol
    Li, Guowei
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Samaan, Zainab
    Jin, Yanling
    Nwosu, Ikunna
    Levine, Mitchell A. H.
    Adachi, Jonathan D.
    Thabane, Lehana
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [8] Measuring and Reporting on Quality in Health Care: A Framework and Road Map for Improving Care
    Brien, Susan E.
    Dixon, Elijah
    Ghali, William A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 99 (08) : 462 - 466
  • [9] Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID): an expert consensus-based statement
    Jayaraman, Jayakumar
    Dhar, Vineet
    Donly, Kevin J.
    Priya, Ekta
    Raggio, Daniela P.
    Childers, Noel K.
    Wright, Timothy J.
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Clarke, Mike
    King, Nigel
    Clarkson, Jan
    Innes, Nicola P. T.
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [10] Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID): an expert consensus-based statement
    Jayakumar Jayaraman
    Vineet Dhar
    Kevin J. Donly
    Ekta Priya
    Daniela P. Raggio
    Noel K. Childers
    Timothy J. Wright
    Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu
    Mike Clarke
    Nigel King
    Jan Clarkson
    Nicola P. T. Innes
    BMC Oral Health, 21