A Review of Uncertainty-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Methods Based on Intelligent Strategies

被引:4
作者
Wang, Chong [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Haoran [1 ,2 ]
Qiang, Xin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianmushan Lab, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Inst Solid Mech, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2023年 / 15卷 / 10期
关键词
uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization; aerospace system; uncertainty analysis; artificial intelligence; UMDO technology; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; SEQUENTIAL OPTIMIZATION; FIELD PREDICTION; MODEL VALIDATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; LIE SYMMETRY; SYSTEM; VEHICLE; ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.3390/sym15101875
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The design of aerospace systems is recognized as a complex interdisciplinary process. Many studies have shown that the exchange of information among multiple disciplines often results in strong coupling and nonlinearity characteristics in system optimization. Meanwhile, inevitable multi-source uncertainty factors continuously accumulate during the optimization process, greatly compromising the system's robustness and reliability. In this context, uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization (UMDO) has emerged and has been preliminarily applied in aerospace practices. However, it still encounters major challenges, including the complexity of multidisciplinary analysis modeling, and organizational and computational complexities of uncertainty analysis and optimization. Extensive research has been conducted recently to address these issues, particularly uncertainty analysis and artificial intelligence strategies. The former further enriches the UMDO technique, while the latter makes outstanding contributions to addressing the computational complexity of UMDO. With the aim of providing an overview of currently available methods, this paper summarizes existing state-of-the art UMDO technologies, with a special focus on relevant intelligent optimization strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 194 条
[1]   A comparative reliability study of corroded pipelines based on Monte Carlo Simulation and Latin Hypercube Sampling methods [J].
Abyani, Mohsen ;
Bahaari, Mohammad Reza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 2020, 181
[2]   Modeling, analysis, and optimization under uncertainties: a review [J].
Acar, Erdem ;
Bayrak, Gamze ;
Jung, Yongsu ;
Lee, Ikjin ;
Ramu, Palaniappan ;
Ravichandran, Suja Shree .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 64 (05) :2909-2945
[3]   Effect of error metrics on optimum weight factor selection for ensemble of metamodels [J].
Acar, Erdem .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (05) :2703-2709
[4]  
Adami A., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), P598, DOI 10.1109/RAST.2011.5966908
[5]   Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review [J].
Afshari, Sajad Saraygord ;
Enayatollahi, Fatemeh ;
Xu, Xiangyang ;
Liang, Xihui .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 219
[6]  
Agarwal H., 2013, P AIAA ASME ASCE AHS
[7]   MDO: assessment and direction for advancement-an opinion of one international group [J].
Agte, Jeremy ;
de Weck, Olivier ;
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, Jaroslaw ;
Arendsen, Paul ;
Morris, Alan ;
Spieck, Martin .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 40 (1-6) :17-33
[8]   On selecting single-level formulations for complex system design optimization [J].
Allison, James T. ;
Kokkolaras, Michael ;
Papalambros, Panos Y. .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2007, 129 (09) :898-906
[9]  
Alturki A, 2021, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V12, P863
[10]   Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions [J].
Alzubaidi, Laith ;
Zhang, Jinglan ;
Humaidi, Amjad J. ;
Al-Dujaili, Ayad ;
Duan, Ye ;
Al-Shamma, Omran ;
Santamaria, J. ;
Fadhel, Mohammed A. ;
Al-Amidie, Muthana ;
Farhan, Laith .
JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2021, 8 (01)