Gendered AI: German news media discourse on the future of work

被引:3
作者
Carstensen, Tanja [1 ]
Ganz, Kathrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Econ & Social Sci, Dept Socioecon, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Gender; Media discourse; Work; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; EMPLOYMENT; SCIENCE; JOBS;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-023-01747-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In recent years, there has been a growing public discourse regarding the influence AI will have on the future of work. Simultaneously, considerable critical attention has been given to the implications of AI on gender equality. Far from making precise predictions about the future, this discourse demonstrates that new technologies are instances for renegotiating the relation of gender and work. This paper examines how gender is addressed in news media discourse on AI and the future of work, focusing on Germany. We approach this question from a perspective of feminist technology studies and discourse analysis, exploring a corpus of 178 articles from 2015 to 2021 from German newspapers and newsmagazines. The findings indicate that critical AI and gender knowledge circulates in public discourse in the form of specific discursive frames, thematizing algorithmic bias, automatization and enhancement, and gender stereotypes. As a result, we show that, first, the discourse takes up feminist and scholarly discourse on gender and discusses AI in a way that is informed by social constructivism and standpoint theories. Second, gender appears as a-to some extent intersectional-diversity category which is critical to AI, while at the same time omitting important perspectives. Third, it can be shown that there is a renegotiating of the ideal worker norm taking place, and finally, we argue that the gendered frame of the powerful men developer responsible for AI's risk is a concept to be challenged.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 889
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
[61]   Gender Wage Inequalities Between Historical Heritage and Structural Adjustments: A German-German Comparison Over Time [J].
Minkus, Lara ;
Busch-Heizmann, Anne .
SOCIAL POLITICS, 2020, 27 (01) :156-186
[62]  
Mohamed Shakir, 2020, Philosophy & Technology, V33, P659, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13347-020-00405-8
[63]   The race for an artificial general intelligence: implications for public policy [J].
Naude, Wim ;
Dimitri, Nicola .
AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (02) :367-379
[64]  
Noble SU., 2018, ALGORITHMS OPPRESSIO, DOI [10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001, DOI 10.18574/NYU/9781479833641.001.0001]
[65]  
ONeil Cathy, 2016, Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy
[66]   Women's employment, segregation and skills in the future of work [J].
Peetz, David ;
Murray, Georgina .
LABOUR & INDUSTRY-A JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RELATIONS OF WORK, 2019, 29 (01) :132-148
[67]   Why Artificial Intelligence Will Not Outsmart Complex Knowledge Work [J].
Pettersen, Lene .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2019, 33 (06) :1058-1067
[68]  
Pfeiffer S., 2020, HMD PRAX WIRTSCH, V57, P465, DOI [10.1365/s40702-020-00609-8, DOI 10.1365/S40702-020-00609-8]
[69]   The Vision of "Industrie 4.0" in the Making-a Case of Future Told, Tamed, and Traded [J].
Pfeiffer, Sabine .
NANOETHICS, 2017, 11 (01) :107-121
[70]   Gender inequalities in the new world of work [J].
Piasna, Agnieszka ;
Drahokoupil, Jan .
TRANSFER-EUROPEAN REVIEW OF LABOUR AND RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (03) :313-332