Cone beam computed tomography image guidance within a magnetic resonance imaging-only planning workflow

被引:1
|
作者
O'Connor, Laura M. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Quinn, Alesha [1 ]
Denley, Samuel [1 ]
Leigh, Lucy [3 ]
Martin, Jarad [1 ]
Dowling, Jason A. [4 ]
Skehan, Kate [1 ]
Warren-Forward, Helen [2 ]
Greer, Peter B. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Edith St, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Univ Dr, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[3] Hunter Med Res Inst, Lot 1 Kookaburra Ct, New Lambton Hts, NSW 2305, Australia
[4] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Australian Ehlth Res Ctr, Bowen Bridge Rd, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, Sch Informat & Phys Sci, Univ Dr, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[6] Calvary Mater Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 20 Edith St, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 27卷
关键词
Radiotherapy; Image-guided radiation therapy; MRI-only radiotherapy planning; Cone Beam Computed Tomography; MRI guided radiation therapy; Magnetic resonance imaging; RADIOTHERAPY; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2023.100472
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-only planning workflows offer many advantages but raises challenges regarding image guidance. The study aimed to assess the viability of MRI to Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) based image guidance for MRI-only planning treatment workflows.Materials and methods: An MRI matching training package was developed. Ten radiation therapists, with a range of clinical image guidance experience and experience with MRI, completed the training package prior to matching assessment. The matching assessment was performed on four match regions: prostate gold seed, prostate soft tissue, rectum/anal canal and gynaecological. Each match region consisted of five patients, with three CBCTs per patient, resulting in fifteen CBCTs for each match region. The ten radiation therapists performed the CBCT image matching to CT and to MRI for all regions and recorded the match values.Results: The median inter-observer variation for MRI-CBCT matching and CT-CBCT matching for all regions were within 2 mm and 1 degree. There was no statistically significant association in the inter-observer variation in mean match values and radiation therapist image guidance experience levels. There was no statistically signif-icant association in inter-observer variation in mean match values for MRI experience levels for prostate soft tissue and gynaecological match regions, while there was a statistically significant difference for prostate gold seed and rectum match regions.Conclusion: The results of this study support the concept that with focussed training, an MRI to CBCT image guidance approach can be successfully implemented in a clinical planning workflow.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography
    Alkhader, M.
    Ohbayashi, N.
    Tetsumura, A.
    Nakamura, S.
    Okochi, K.
    Momin, M. A.
    Kurabayashi, T.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (05) : 270 - 276
  • [42] Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
    Svestad, Jorund Graadal
    Ramberg, Christina
    Skar, Birgitte
    Hellebust, Taran Paulsen
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 12 : 1 - 6
  • [43] LIPIODOL: A POTENTIAL DIRECT SURROGATE FOR CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE GUIDANCE IN RADIOTHERAPY OF LIVER TUMOR
    Yue, Jinbo
    Sun, Xindong
    Cai, Jing
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Yin, Yong
    Zhu, Jian
    Lu, Jie
    Liu, Tonghai
    Yu, Jinming
    Shi, Xuetao
    Song, Jinlong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 834 - 841
  • [44] Nano X Image Guidance in radiation therapy: feasibility study protocol for cone beam computed tomography imaging with gravity-induced motion
    Debrot, Emily
    Liu, Paul
    Gardner, Mark
    Heng, Soo Min
    Chan, Chin Hwa
    Corde, Stephanie
    Downes, Simon
    Jackson, Michael
    Keall, Paul
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [45] Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dose optimization technique and image quality assessment scoring
    Trivedi, Gaurav
    Singh, Pushpendra P.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Singh, Ranjit
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [46] The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants
    Worthington, Philip
    Rubenstein, Jeffrey
    Hatcher, David C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 141 (10) : 19S - 24S
  • [47] Image Guidance During Head-and-Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy: Analysis of Alignment Trends With In-Room Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans
    Zumsteg, Zachary
    DeMarco, John
    Lee, Steve P.
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Lin, Chun Shu
    McBride, William
    Lin, Kevin
    Wang, Pin-Chieh
    Kupelian, Patrick
    Lee, Percy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (02): : 712 - 719
  • [48] An Inter-observer Study to Determine Radiotherapy Planning Target Volumes for Recurrent Gynaecological Cancer Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Only With Computed Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bernstein, D.
    Taylor, A.
    Nill, S.
    Imseeh, G.
    Kothari, G.
    Llewelyn, M.
    De Paepe, K. N.
    Rockall, A.
    Shiarli, A-M
    Oelfke, U.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (05) : 307 - 313
  • [49] Single Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Planning in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy
    Beriwal, S.
    Kim, H.
    Coon, D.
    Mogus, R.
    Heron, D. E.
    Li, X.
    Huq, M. S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 21 (06) : 483 - 487
  • [50] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning
    Aguiar, Marcelo F.
    Marques, Alexandre P.
    Carvalho, Antonio Carlos P.
    Cavalcanti, Marcelo G. P.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (04) : 362 - 365