The association between trial of labor after cesarean in obese patients and adverse maternal outcomes

被引:2
作者
Jude, Gabrielle [1 ]
Fain, Audra [1 ]
Raker, Christina [1 ]
Rubenstein, Shayna [1 ]
Bicocca, Matthew [2 ]
Wagner, Stephen [3 ,4 ]
Gupta, Megha [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Houston, TX USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
TOLAC; Obesity; Maternal morbidity; VAGINAL BIRTH; DELIVERY; RISK; SECTION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-023-07113-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
PurposeWe hypothesized that among obese patients with a history of cesarean birth, a TOLAC is associated with decreased composite maternal adverse outcomes (CMAO) compared to planned repeat low transverse cesarean section (RLTCS).MethodsIn this population-based cross-sectional study using the National Birth Certificate database from 2016 to 2020, we compared obese patients who attempted TOLAC at term (& GE; 37 weeks estimated gestational age) to planned RLTCS. The primary outcome was a CMAO, defined as delivery complications, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, or maternal blood transfusion.ResultsOverall, 794,278 patients met inclusion criteria for the study; 126,809 underwent a TOLAC, and 667,469 had a planned RLTCS. The overall CMAO was significantly higher for patients undergoing TOLAC (9.0 per 1000 live births) compared to RLTCS (5.3 per 1000 live births; aRR 1.64, 95% CI 1.53-1.75).ConclusionThis data demonstrate that in obese patients with prior cesarean birth, a trial of labor is associated with increased maternal morbidity when compared to a planned repeat cesarean birth.
引用
收藏
页码:2421 / 2426
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abdelazim IA, 2025, J TURK-GER GYNECOL A, V26, DOI 10.5152/jtgga.2014.14104
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe110, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078
[3]   Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes [J].
Carroll, CS ;
Magann, EF ;
Chauhan, SP ;
Klauser, CK ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) :1516-1520
[4]   Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: Vaginal versus repeat cesarean section [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Magann, EF ;
Carroll, CS ;
Barrilleaux, PS ;
Scardo, JA ;
Martin, JN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (02) :349-353
[5]   Delivery After Prior Cesarean: Maternal Morbidity and Mortality [J].
Cheng, Yvonne W. ;
Eden, Karen B. ;
Marshall, Nicole ;
Pereira, Leonardo ;
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Guise, Jeanne-Marie .
CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2011, 38 (02) :297-+
[6]   Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis [J].
Chu, S. Y. ;
Kim, S. Y. ;
Schmid, C. H. ;
Dietz, P. M. ;
Callaghan, W. M. ;
Lau, J. ;
Curtis, K. M. .
OBESITY REVIEWS, 2007, 8 (05) :385-394
[7]   The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success [J].
Durnwald, CP ;
Ehrenberg, HM ;
Mercer, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) :954-957
[8]   Deciding on route of delivery for obese women with a prior cesarean delivery [J].
Edwards, RK ;
Harnsberger, DS ;
Johnson, IM ;
Treloar, RW ;
Cruz, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (02) :385-389
[9]  
Gillespie Brigid M, 2022, AJOG Glob Rep, V2, P100069, DOI 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100069
[10]   False Alarms and Pseudo-Epidemics The Limitations of Observational Epidemiology [J].
Grimes, David A. ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (04) :920-927