Clinical use conditions of lead deployment and simulated lead fracture rate in left bundle branch area pacing

被引:11
作者
Zou, Jiangang [1 ]
Chen, Keping [2 ]
Liu, Xingbin [3 ]
Xu, Yuanning [3 ]
Jiang, Lingyun [3 ]
Dai, Yan [2 ]
Lin, Jinxuan [2 ]
Hou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Qiu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Himes, Adam [4 ]
Lucas, Ryan [4 ]
Demmer, Wade [4 ]
Mara, Nicki [4 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Lu, Hongyang [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Arrhythmia Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Medtronic Plc, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Medtron Shanghai Ltd, Medtron Technol Ctr, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
3830 SelectSecure pacing lead; cardiac pacing; left bundle branch area pacing; mechanical use condition; LUMENLESS; EXPERIENCE; BIPOLAR;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionLeft bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is achieved by advancing the lead tip deep in the septum. Most LBBAP implants are performed using the Medtronic SelectSecure (TM) MRI SecureScan (TM) Model 3830 featuring a unique 4 Fr fixed helix lumenless design. Details of lead use conditions and long-term reliability have not been reported. This study was designed to quantify the mechanical use conditions for the 3830 lead during and after LBBAP implant, and to evaluate reliability using bench testing and simulation. MethodsFifty bradycardia patients with implantation of the 3830 lead for LBBAP were enrolled. Use conditions of lead deployment at implantation were collected and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at 3-month follow-up. Curvature amplitude along the pacing lead was determined with CT images. Fatigue bending was performed using accelerated testing in a more severe environment than routine clinical use conditions. Conductor fracture rate in a simulated patient population was estimated based on clinical use conditions and fatigue test results. ResultsThe number of attempts to place the 3830 lead for LBBAP was 2.1 +/- 1.3 (range: 1-7) with 13 +/- 6 lead rotations at the final attempt. Extreme implant conditions were simulated in bench testing with 5 applications of 20 turns followed by up to 400 million bending cycles. Reliability modeling predicted a 10-year fracture rate of 0.02%. ConclusionsLBBAP implants require more lead rotations than standard pacing implants and result in unique lead bending. Application of simulated LBBAP use conditions to the 3830 lead in an accelerated in-vitro model does not produce excess conductor fractures.IMAGE-LBBP Study ID of ClinicalTrial.GOV: NCT04119323.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 725
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lowering the threshold for left bundle branch area pacing
    Cerbin, Lukasz P.
    Garg, Lohit
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1537 - 1539
  • [22] Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing: Prognosis and specific applications
    Yang, Zhen
    Liang, Jiadong
    Chen, Ruizhe
    Pang, Naidong
    Zhang, Nan
    Guo, Min
    Gao, Jia
    Wang, Rui
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (01): : 80 - 87
  • [23] Medium- and Long-Term Lead Stability and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing
    Zhu, Haojie
    Wang, Zhao
    Li, Xiaofei
    Yao, Yan
    Liu, Zhimin
    Fan, Xiaohan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2021, 8 (12)
  • [24] Case Report: Interventricular Septal Hematoma Complicating Left Bundle Branch Pacing Lead Implantation
    Zheng, Rujie
    Wu, Shengjie
    Wang, Songjie
    Su, Lan
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Huang, Weijian
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [25] A Case of Intraoperative Changes in the Nonselective Left Bundle Branch Pacing Morphology: Is Lead Dislodgment the Cause?
    Matsumoto, Naoki
    Shimeno, Kenji
    Matsuo, Masanori
    Abe, Yukio
    Fukuda, Daiju
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, : 905 - 908
  • [26] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for LBBB Will Left Ventricular Septal Pacing Do?
    Friedman, Daniel J.
    Chelu, Mihail G.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (10) : 2247 - 2249
  • [27] Case Report: Extraction of a stylet-driven lead for left bundle branch area pacing >2 years after implantation
    Romic, Ivana Grgic
    Bastiancic, Ana Lanca
    Zidan, David
    Mavric, Mate
    Brusich, Sandro
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [28] Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing
    Zhang, JunMeng
    Wang, Zefeng
    Cheng, Liting
    Zu, Linna
    Liang, Zhuo
    Hang, Fei
    Wang, Xinlu
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Su, Ruijuan
    Du, Jie
    Wu, Yongquan
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (08) : 768 - 773
  • [29] Septal scar as a barrier to left bundle branch area pacing
    Ali, Nadine
    Arnold, Ahran D.
    Miyazawa, Alejandra A.
    Keene, Daniel
    Peters, Nicholas S.
    Kanagaratnam, Prapa
    Qureshi, Norman
    Ng, Fu Siong
    Linton, Nick W. F.
    Lefroy, David C.
    Francis, Darrel P.
    Lim, Phang Boon
    Kellman, Peter
    Tanner, Mark A.
    Muthumala, Amal
    Shun-Shin, Matthew
    Whinnett, Zachary I.
    Cole, Graham D.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (09): : 1077 - 1084
  • [30] Closed loop stimulation in left bundle branch area pacing
    Dell'Era, Gabriele
    Ghiglieno, Chiara
    De Vecchi, Federica
    Santagostino, Matteo
    Annunziata, Lucia
    Baldassarre, Irene
    Giacopelli, Daniele
    Patti, Giuseppe
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (09): : 1276 - 1279