Clinical use conditions of lead deployment and simulated lead fracture rate in left bundle branch area pacing

被引:11
作者
Zou, Jiangang [1 ]
Chen, Keping [2 ]
Liu, Xingbin [3 ]
Xu, Yuanning [3 ]
Jiang, Lingyun [3 ]
Dai, Yan [2 ]
Lin, Jinxuan [2 ]
Hou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Qiu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Himes, Adam [4 ]
Lucas, Ryan [4 ]
Demmer, Wade [4 ]
Mara, Nicki [4 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Lu, Hongyang [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Arrhythmia Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Medtronic Plc, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Medtron Shanghai Ltd, Medtron Technol Ctr, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
3830 SelectSecure pacing lead; cardiac pacing; left bundle branch area pacing; mechanical use condition; LUMENLESS; EXPERIENCE; BIPOLAR;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionLeft bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is achieved by advancing the lead tip deep in the septum. Most LBBAP implants are performed using the Medtronic SelectSecure (TM) MRI SecureScan (TM) Model 3830 featuring a unique 4 Fr fixed helix lumenless design. Details of lead use conditions and long-term reliability have not been reported. This study was designed to quantify the mechanical use conditions for the 3830 lead during and after LBBAP implant, and to evaluate reliability using bench testing and simulation. MethodsFifty bradycardia patients with implantation of the 3830 lead for LBBAP were enrolled. Use conditions of lead deployment at implantation were collected and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at 3-month follow-up. Curvature amplitude along the pacing lead was determined with CT images. Fatigue bending was performed using accelerated testing in a more severe environment than routine clinical use conditions. Conductor fracture rate in a simulated patient population was estimated based on clinical use conditions and fatigue test results. ResultsThe number of attempts to place the 3830 lead for LBBAP was 2.1 +/- 1.3 (range: 1-7) with 13 +/- 6 lead rotations at the final attempt. Extreme implant conditions were simulated in bench testing with 5 applications of 20 turns followed by up to 400 million bending cycles. Reliability modeling predicted a 10-year fracture rate of 0.02%. ConclusionsLBBAP implants require more lead rotations than standard pacing implants and result in unique lead bending. Application of simulated LBBAP use conditions to the 3830 lead in an accelerated in-vitro model does not produce excess conductor fractures.IMAGE-LBBP Study ID of ClinicalTrial.GOV: NCT04119323.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 725
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Late distal conductor fracture of the lumenless pacing lead after left bundle branch area pacing
    Rangaswamy, Vickram Vignesh
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (04) : 490 - 491
  • [2] Lead deformation of the stylet-driven lead in left bundle branch area pacing
    Okubo, Yousaku
    Miyamoto, Shogo
    Oguri, Naoto
    Sakai, Takumi
    Uotani, Yukimi
    Miyauchi, Shunsuke
    Okamura, Sho
    Tokuyama, Takehito
    Nakano, Yukiko
    HEART RHYTHM, 2023, 20 (05) : 781 - 782
  • [3] Extraction of stylet-driven pacing lead for left bundle branch area pacing
    Bonfanti, Paolo
    Mantovani, Antonio
    Refugjati, Taulant
    Sormani, Luca
    Corrado, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2024, 40 (01) : 174 - 176
  • [4] 3830 lead extraction from two patients with left bundle branch area pacing
    Hayashi, Yusuke
    Shimeno, Kenji
    Tamura, Shota
    Naruko, Takahiko
    Fukuda, Daiju
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2023, 39 (04) : 623 - 626
  • [5] Diverse QRS morphology reflecting variations in lead placement for left bundle branch area pacing
    Sato, Toshiaki
    Togashi, Ikuko
    Ikewaki, Hirotsugu
    Mohri, Takato
    Katsume, Yumi
    Tashiro, Mika
    Nonoguchi, Noriko
    Hoshida, Kyoko
    Ueda, Akiko
    Matsuo, Seiichiro
    Soejima, Kyoko
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (09):
  • [6] Tricuspid regurgitation and infective endocarditis as a cause of lead dislodgement in left bundle branch area pacing
    Ekinci, Selim
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (05): : 683 - 687
  • [7] Left bundle branch area pacing lead implantation using an uninterrupted monitoring of endocardial signals
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05) : 1055 - 1057
  • [8] Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to His bundle pacing
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Rajakumar, Clement
    Naperkowski, Angela M.
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (06) : 1234 - 1243
  • [9] Left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead for LBBAP: Safety and efficacy in a new use-case
    Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (09) : 1736 - 1737
  • [10] „Left bundle branch (area) pacing“: Sondenpositionierung und Erfolgskriterien – Schritt für SchrittLeft bundle branch (area) pacing: lead positioning and implant criteria—step for step
    Joern Schmitt
    Till Althoff
    Sonia Busch
    KR Julian Chun
    Tillman Dahme
    Micaela Ebert
    Heidi Estner
    Melanie Gunawardene
    Christian Heeger
    Leon Iden
    Henning Jansen
    Victoria Johnson
    Tilman Maurer
    Andreas Rillig
    Sascha Rolf
    Philipp Sommer
    Daniel Steven
    Richard Roland Tilz
    David Duncker
    Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, 2025, 36 (1) : 82 - 90