The effect of pay for performance on work attitudes in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors: A panel study from South Korea

被引:8
作者
Bae, Kwang Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ Seoul, Dept Publ Adm, 30 Pildong Ro 1 Gil, Seoul 04620, South Korea
关键词
Job satisfaction; organizational commitment; panel study; pay for performance; sectoral comparison; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; SELF-EFFICACY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; SERVICE MOTIVATION; JOB-SATISFACTION; CONTROL-SYSTEMS; ORGANIZATION; COMMITMENT; MANAGEMENT; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1177/00208523211027329
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to examine the differing effects of pay for performance on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the public, private, and nonprofit sectors. Using data from the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study, this research found that pay for performance has a positive relationship with job satisfaction and organizational commitment in the private sector, a negative relationship with job satisfaction in the public sector, and a negative relationship with organizational commitment in the nonprofit sector. Points for practitioners When organizations in the public and nonprofit sectors begin adopting policies to increase extrinsic motivation, managers and scholars should carefully consider the negative effects of monetary incentives on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The public sector emphasizes public values and public interests, which explains the significant effect of pay for performance on job satisfaction; meanwhile, the fact that the nonprofit sector focuses on organizational missions and goals, stakeholders, and employee motivation explains the positive effect of pay for performance on organizational commitment.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 201
页数:16
相关论文
共 85 条
[11]   Comparing Workplace Organization Design Based on Form of Ownership: Nonprofit, For-Profit, and Local Government [J].
Ben-Ner, Avner ;
Ren, Ting .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2015, 44 (02) :340-359
[12]   The Success of Failure: The Paradox of Performance Pay [J].
Bowman, James S. .
REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 30 (01) :70-88
[13]   The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment questionnaire-turnover cognitions relationships [J].
Bozeman, DP ;
Perrewé, PL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (01) :161-173
[14]   Performance-based public management reforms: experience and emerging lessons from service delivery improvement in Indonesia [J].
Brinkerhoff, Derick W. ;
Wetterberg, Anna .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 79 (03) :433-457
[15]   Earnings, education, and fixed-term contracts [J].
Brown, S ;
Sessions, JG .
SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 50 (04) :492-506
[16]   How much performance pay is there in the public sector and what are its effects? [J].
Bryson, Alex ;
Forth, John ;
Stokes, Lucy .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 27 (04) :581-597
[17]   INCENTIVES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: EVIDENCE FROM A GOVERNMENT AGENCY [J].
Burgess, Simon ;
Propper, Carol ;
Ratto, Marisa ;
Tominey, Emma .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2017, 127 (605) :F117-F141
[18]   A Meta-Analysis of Job Satisfaction Correlates in the Public Administration Literature [J].
Cantarelli, Paola ;
Belardinelli, Paolo ;
Belle, Nicola .
REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 36 (02) :115-144
[19]   Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, image, and incentives [J].
Carpenter, Jeffrey ;
Myers, Caitlin Knowles .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2010, 94 (11-12) :911-920
[20]   Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives Jointly Predict Performance: A 40-Year Meta-Analysis [J].
Cerasoli, Christopher P. ;
Nicklin, Jessica M. ;
Ford, Michael T. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (04) :980-1008