Factors Influencing Engagement in Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Yue [1 ]
Ch'ng, Eugene [2 ]
Cobb, Sue [3 ]
机构
[1] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Sch Adv Technol, Dept Comp, 111 Renai Rd, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Nottingham, NVIDIA Joint Lab Mixed Real, 199 Taikang East Rd, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Nottingham, Human Factors Res Grp, Fac Engn, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Virtual reality; augmented reality; mixed reality; engagement; presence; electroencephalogram; mEEG; USER ENGAGEMENT; TASK ENGAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTS; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; FRAMEWORK; INDEXES; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1145/3589952
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Hybridity in immersive technologies has not been studied for factors that are likely to influence engagement. A noticeable factor is the spatial enclosure that defines where users meet. This involves a mutual object of interest, contents that the users may generate around the object, and the proximity between users. This study examines these factors, namely how object interactivity, user-generated contents (UGC) and avatar proximity influence engagement. We designed a Hybrid Virtual andAugmentedReality (HVAR) environment that supports paired users to experience cultural heritage in both Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). A user study was conducted with 60 participants, providing assessments of engagement and presence via questionnaires, together with mobile electroencephalogram (mEEG) and user activity data that measures VR user engagement in real-time. Our findings provide insights into how engagement between users can occur in HVAR environments for the future hybrid reality with multi-device connectivity.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Augmented and Virtual Reality in Surgery
    Desselle, Mathilde R.
    Brown, Ross A.
    James, Allan R.
    Midwinter, Mark J.
    Powell, Sean
    Woodruff, Maria A.
    COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2020, 22 (03) : 18 - 26
  • [42] Acceptance and Influencing Factors of Social Virtual Reality in the Urban Elderly
    Shao, Dan
    Lee, I-Jui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 19
  • [43] Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Anesthesiology Education
    Guruswamy, Jayakar
    Chhina, Anoop
    Mitchell, John D.
    Shah, Sonalee
    Uribe-Marquez, Santiago
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2024, 62 (03) : 64 - 70
  • [44] Attributes of Virtual and Augmented Reality Tourism Mobile Applications Predicting Tourist Behavioral Engagement
    Omran, Wajdy
    Casais, Beatriz
    Ramos, Ricardo F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2025,
  • [45] Virtual reality and augmented reality in digestive surgery
    Soler, L
    Nicolau, S
    Schmid, J
    Koehl, C
    Marescaux, J
    Pennec, X
    Ayache, N
    ISMAR 2004: THIRD IEEE AND ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MIXED AND AUGMENTED REALITY, 2004, : 278 - 279
  • [46] Qualitative Communications for Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality
    Westphal, Cedric
    He, Dongbiao
    Makhijani, Kiran
    Li, Richard
    2021 IEEE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE SWITCHING AND ROUTING (IEEE HPSR), 2021,
  • [47] Speed reading on virtual reality and augmented reality
    Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
    Zheng, Jian
    Guo, Zhi
    Li, Jiaqi
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 125 : 240 - 245
  • [48] Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical simulation
    Aimin HAO
    虚拟现实与智能硬件(中英文), 2021, 3 (04) : 1 - 1
  • [49] Virtual worlds, augmented reality, blended reality
    Hughes, Ian
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2012, 56 (18) : 3879 - 3885
  • [50] Framework of Affordances for Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality
    Steffen, Jacob H.
    Gaskin, James E.
    Meservy, Thomas O.
    Jenkins, Jeffrey L.
    Wolman, Iopa
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (03) : 683 - 729