Rapid Assessment of Seismic Risk for Railway Bridges Based on Machine Learning

被引:16
作者
Huang, Yong [1 ,2 ]
He, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Zhihui [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Engn Mech, Key Lab Earthquake Engn & Engn Vibrat, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Emergency Management, Key Lab Earthquake Disaster Mitigat, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr High Speed Railway Construction, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Machine learning; railway bridges; seismic risk; empirical vulnerability;
D O I
10.1142/S0219455424500561
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
When an earthquake occurs, railway bridges will suffer from different degrees of seismic damage, and it is necessary to assess the seismic risk of bridges. Unfortunately, the majority of studies were done on highway bridges without taking into account railway bridge characteristics; hence they are not applicable to railway bridges. Furthermore, current research methods for risk assessment cannot be performed quickly, and suffer from the problems of subjective personal experience, complicated calculations, and time-consuming. This paper we use machine learning for earthquake damage prediction and empirical vulnerability curves to represent risk assessment results, creating a rapid risk assessment procedure. We gathered and tallied seismic damage data from 335 railway bridges that were damaged in the Tangshan and Menyuan earthquakes, found six variables that had a substantial impact on seismic risk outcomes, and categorized the damage levels into five categories. It is essentially a multi-classification and prediction problem. In order to solve this problem, four algorithms were tested: Random Forest (RF) Back Propagation Artiifcial Neural Network (BP-ANN), PSO-Support Vector Machine (PSO-SVM), and K Nearest Neighbor (KNN). It was found that RF is the most effective method, with an accuracy rate of up to 93.31% for the training set and 89.39% for the test set. Then this study describes the new procedure in detail for rapidly assessing seismic risk to 269 bridges chosen at random from the sample pool. Firstly, the seismic damage data of bridges are collated, then the seismic damage rating is predicted using RF, and finally the empirical vulnerability curve is drawn using a two-parameter normal distribution function for the purpose of seismic damage risk assessment. The study's findings can be used as a guide for choosing a machine learning approach and its inputs to build a rapid assessment model for railway bridges.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 177422008 GBT
[2]  
Ansari Abdullah, 2022, Recent Developments in Sustainable Infrastructure (ICRDSI-2020)-GEO-TRA-ENV-WRM: Conference Proceedings from ICRDSI-2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (207), P611, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-7509-6_47
[3]   Seismic response and fragility evaluation of circular tunnels in the Himalayan region: Implications for post-seismic performance of transportation infrastructure projects in Jammu and Kashmir [J].
Ansari, Abdullah ;
Rao, K. Seshagiri ;
Jain, Arvind K. .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 137
[4]   Reconnaissance surveys after June 2022 Khost earthquake in Afghanistan: implication towards seismic vulnerability assessment for future design [J].
Ansari, Abdullah ;
Zaray, Abdul Habib ;
Rao, K. S. ;
Jain, A. K. ;
Hashmat, Parvez Ahmad ;
Ikram, Mohammad Karam ;
Wahidi, Abdul Wahid .
INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2023, 8 (03)
[5]   Seismic Response and Vulnerability Evaluation of Jammu Region (Jammu and Kashmir) [J].
Ansari, Abdullah ;
Zahoor, Falak ;
Rao, K. S. ;
Jain, A. K. .
INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 53 (03) :509-522
[6]   Seismic Vulnerability of Tunnels in Jammu and Kashmir for Post Seismic Functionality [J].
Ansari, Abdullah ;
Rao, K. Seshagiri ;
Jain, Arvind K. .
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 41 (02) :1371-1396
[7]   Deep learning model for predicting tunnel damages and track serviceability under seismic environment [J].
Ansari, Abdullah ;
Rao, K. S. ;
Jain, A. K. ;
Ansari, Anas .
MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 9 (01) :1349-1368
[8]  
Cai L. W., 2022, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V42, P8
[9]  
[陈力波 Chen Libo], 2012, [西南交通大学学报, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University], V47, P558
[10]   SUPPORT-VECTOR NETWORKS [J].
CORTES, C ;
VAPNIK, V .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1995, 20 (03) :273-297