Effectiveness of dementia education for professional care staff and factors influencing staff-related outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews

被引:17
作者
Rasmussen, Birthe Marie [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Andersen, Pernille Tanggaard [1 ]
Waldorff, Frans Boch [2 ,3 ]
Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Unit Hlth Promot Res, Esbjerg, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Esbjerg, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Unit Hlth Promot Res, Degnevej 14, DK-6705 Esbjerg O, Denmark
关键词
Dementia; Education; Nursing staff; Care staff; Staff development; Program evaluation; Risk factor; Systematic review; NURSING-HOME STAFF; TRAINING-PROGRAMS; KIRKPATRICK MODEL; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH-CARE; INTERVENTIONS; WORKING; COMMUNICATION; QUALITY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104469
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Care staff often lack knowledge, confidence, skills, and competency to provide optimal care for peo-ple with dementia. Dementia education can increase staff competency and wellbeing along with the actual care of people with dementia. Several factors can affect the effectiveness of dementia education; however, it is not yet established which factors are most important.Objective: The aim of the overview of systematic reviews is to investigate the effectiveness of dementia education for care staff on staff-related outcomes and influencing factors, identify needs for future research, and provide practical recommendations for effective dementia education.Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Cinahl, and PsycInfo accompanied by manual citation and reference searches. For inclusion, reviews must report on either effectiveness of one staff-related outcome or on factors influencing the effectiveness of dementia education for care staff. Quality assessments were conducted using AMSTAR2. After data extraction, results on effectiveness were structured according to satisfaction, learning, behavior, and results. Results on contributing factors to effectiveness were categorized into program, personal and organizational factors. All results were qualitatively summarized and reported according to the PRISMA statement.Results: Seventeen systematic reviews of low to medium quality were included. Dementia education positively affects knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes towards dementia and people with dementia. Care staff experi-enced improvements in communication and behavior management and reduction in behavioral symptoms of de-mentia of people with dementia was seen as well. Most reviews found no changes within restraints, medication, staff well-being and job satisfaction. Factors contributing to effectiveness are relevant and directly applicable con-tent, active learning methods, classroom teaching combined with practical experience, theory-driven approaches and feedback sessions. Finally, the instructor needs to be experienced within dementia and sensitive to the needs of participants.Conclusion: There is no one-size -fits-all in dementia education: however, perceived relevance and applicability are key elements for effective dementia education. Due to low quality of primary studies, further research of high methodological quality is needed on effectiveness of dementia education on staff behavior, wellbeing, and job satisfaction as well as on influencing factors and their impact on mechanisms of change.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Training interventions to improve general hospital care for older people with cognitive impairment: systematic review [J].
Abley, Clare ;
Dickinson, Claire ;
Andrews, Zoe ;
Prato, Laura ;
Lindley, Lyndsay ;
Robinson, Louise .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 214 (04) :201-212
[2]  
Alzheimer's Disease International, 2016, World Alzheimer Report 2016
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, World Alzheimer Report 2010: The Global Economic Impact of Dementia
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, World Alzheimer Report
[5]   Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach [J].
Aromataris, Edoardo ;
Fernandez, Ritin ;
Godfrey, Christina M. ;
Holly, Cheryl ;
Khalil, Hanan ;
Tungpunkom, Patraporn .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) :132-140
[6]   A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence [J].
Bates, R .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2004, 27 (03) :341-347
[7]   FROM NOVICE TO EXPERT [J].
BENNER, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1982, 82 (03) :402-407
[8]  
Benner P., 2004, Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc., V24, P188, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0270467604265061, 10.1177/0270467604265061]
[9]   'Thinking outside the box': advanced geriatric nursing in primary health care in Scandinavia [J].
Boman, Erika ;
Glasberg, Ann-Louise ;
Levy-Malmberg, Rika ;
Fagerstrom, Lisbeth .
BMC NURSING, 2019, 18 (1)
[10]   Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia [J].
Brodaty, H ;
Green, A ;
Koschera, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (05) :657-664