Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional persistence of high growth firms: A ?broken clock? critique

被引:20
作者
Coad, Alex [1 ]
Srhoj, Stjepan [2 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Waseda Business Sch, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Split, Fac Econ Business & Tourism, Dept Econ, Split, Croatia
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
High-growth firms; Persistence; Regional persistence; Entrepreneurial ecosystems; Clusters; Sectoral Systems of Innovation; NATIONAL SYSTEMS; SILICON VALLEY; INNOVATION; POLICY; DYNAMICS; GAZELLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2023.104762
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (EE) approach makes specific predictions regarding how EE inputs are converted into high-growth firms (HGFs) as an output. A simulation model draws out our hypothesis of regional persistence in HGF shares. Based on intuitions that EEs are persistent, we investigate whether regional HGF shares are persistent, using census data for 2 European countries taken separately (Croatia for 2004-2019, and Slovenia for 2007-2019). Overall, there is no clear persistence in regional HGF shares - regions with large HGF shares in one period are not necessarily likely to have large HGF shares in the following period. This is a puzzle for EE theory. In fact, there seems to be more persistence in industry-level HGF shares than for regional HGF shares. We formulate a 'broken clock' critique - just as a broken clock is correct twice a day, EE recommendations may sometimes be correct, but are fundamentally flawed as long as time-changing outputs (HGF shares) are predicted using time-invariant variables (such as local universities, institutions, investments in R&D and infrastructure).
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   A holistic approach to the evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploratory study of academic spin-offs [J].
Abootorabi, Hooman ;
Wiklund, Johan ;
Johnson, Alan R. ;
Miller, Cameron D. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2021, 36 (05)
[2]   National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Autio, Erkko ;
Szerb, Laszlo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (03) :476-494
[3]   UNICORNS, GAZELLES, AND OTHER DISTRACTIONS ON THE WAY TO UNDERSTANDING REAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE UNITED STATES [J].
Aldrich, Howard E. ;
Ruef, Martin .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 32 (04) :458-472
[4]   A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda [J].
Alvedalen, Janna ;
Boschma, Ron .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2017, 25 (06) :887-903
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Eurostat-OECD Manual on Business Demography Statistics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1931, Sirey
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PAP REG SCI, DOI DOI 10.1111/pirs.12133
[8]   Knowledge Spillovers and Corporate Investment in Scientific Research [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Sheer, Lia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (03) :871-898
[9]   Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: the role of creative class and entrepreneurship [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Belitski, Maksim .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 55 (04) :735-756
[10]   Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context [J].
Autio, Erkko ;
Kenney, Martin ;
Mustar, Philippe ;
Siegel, Don ;
Wright, Mike .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (07) :1097-1108