CO2 high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage (CO2 HT-ATES) feasible study: Combing the heating storage and CCUS

被引:4
|
作者
Zhou, Dejian [1 ]
Li, Ke [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gao, Huhao [1 ]
Ganzer, Leonhard [2 ]
Sauter, Martin [1 ,5 ]
Jaeger, Philip [2 ]
Tatomir, Alexandru [1 ]
机构
[1] Gottingen Univ, Dept Appl Geol, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Clausthal, Inst Subsurface Energy Syst, Aachen, Germany
[3] Drilling Simulator Celle, D-29221 Celle, Germany
[4] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Geosci & Technol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Leibniz Inst Appl Geophys LIAG, Hannover, Germany
来源
GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 122卷
关键词
Carbon dioxide; High -temperature aquifer thermal energy; storage; Geothermal energy; Reservoir simulation; Deep aquifer; GEOTHERMAL CPG; PERFORMANCE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205224
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, utilization, storage (CCUS), and High-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage (HT-ATES) have been considered as effective advanced techniques that could remarkably contribute to renewable energy and mitigating global warming. Thus, this study tries to combine these two concepts. We investigate the potential for storing & extracting the heating from deep aquifers by utilizing CO2 as a working fluid. To compare the performance of CO2 and traditional HT -ATES working fluid water (H2O), two parallel HT-ATES cycling simulations are employed in DuMux based on a real geology model, identical well doublet design, and pump performance to test the behavior of H2O HT-ATES and CO2 HT-ATES. The 30 years cycling simulation shows CO2 HT-ATES have similar reliable performance to H2O HT-ATES, but there is some difference worth noting: The traditional H2O HT-ATES (76-90 C) have a higher and more stable extract temperature than CO2 HT-ATES (73-90 C-degrees) because of water heat capacity is larger. The CO2 HT-ATES (27.3-28.3 kg/s) have higher flow rates than H2O HT-ATES (20.8-24.3 kg/s) since the viscosity difference. The CO2 HT-ATES could form the CO2 gas cap, thermal conduction and convection to the caprock less than H2O HT-ATES, which leads to less heating loss during the heating store stage. H2O HT-ATES (4000 TJ) have more total energy input/output volume than CO2 HT-ATES (3000 TJ), but the energy efficiency of CO2 HT-ATES (92 %) is superior to H2O HT-ATES (85 %). Besides, CO2 HT-ATES can sequester a certain amount of CO2 yearly, over 1.6 Mt CO2 will be sequestered in the aquifer after 30 years of operation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Numerical studies on the aquifer storage of CO2 containing N2
    Wei, N.
    Li, X. C.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 4314 - 4322
  • [22] Thermal parameter optimization design of an energy storage system with CO2 as working fluid
    Hao, Yinping
    He, Qing
    Fu, Hailun
    Du, Dongmei
    Liu, Wenyi
    ENERGY, 2021, 230
  • [23] Integrated assessment of variable density-viscosity groundwater flow for a high temperature mono-well aquifer thermal energy storage (HT-ATES) system in a geothermal reservoir
    Zeghici, Razvan Mihai
    Essink, Gualbert H. P. Oude
    Hartog, Niels
    Sommer, Wijbrand
    GEOTHERMICS, 2015, 55 : 58 - 68
  • [24] Geochemical reactions and their effect on CO2 storage efficiency during the whole process of CO2 EOR and subsequent storage
    Cui, Guodong
    Zhu, Lihong
    Zhou, Qiucheng
    Ren, Shaoran
    Wang, Jingyin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2021, 108
  • [25] Criteria for selecting sites for integrated CO2 storage and geothermal energy recovery
    Uliasz-Misiak, Barbara
    Lewandowska-Smierzchalska, Joanna
    Matula, Rafal
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 285
  • [26] Development and comprehensive thermo-economic analysis of a novel compressed CO2 energy storage system integrated with high-temperature thermal
    Tang, Junrong
    Li, Qibin
    Werle, Sebastian
    Wang, Shukun
    Yu, Haoshui
    ENERGY, 2024, 303
  • [27] Suitability of basins in Russia for aquifer CO2 storage: evaluation strategy
    Novikov, Dmitry A.
    Fomina, Yana V.
    Yurchik, Irina I.
    Derkachev, Anton S.
    Chernykh, Anatoliy V.
    Dultsev, Fedor F.
    Maximova, Anastasia A.
    Nikitenkov, Alexsey N.
    Golovin, Sergey V.
    JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 9 (02) : 375 - 395
  • [28] Mass, energy and economic analysis of supersonic CO2 separation for carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS)
    Ding, Hongbing
    Dong, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Yu
    Wen, Chuang
    Yang, Yan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 373
  • [29] Controls on CO2 storage security in natural reservoirs and implications for CO2 storage site selection
    Miocic, Johannes M.
    Gilfillan, Stuart M. V.
    Roberts, Jennifer J.
    Edlmann, Katriona
    McDermott, Christopher I.
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 51 : 118 - 125
  • [30] Applicability of thermal response tests for assessing in-situ CO2 storage in a saline aquifer
    Park, Chan-Hee
    Lee, Seong Kon
    Lee, Cholwoo
    Kim, Seong-Kyun
    ENERGY, 2018, 154 : 210 - 220